Abdollahifard Saeed, Farrokhi Amirmohammad, Mosalamiaghili Seyedarad, Assadian Kasra, Yousefi Omid, Razmkon Ali
Research Center for Neuromodulation and Pain, Shiraz, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Feb;123(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s13760-022-02118-5. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
Recently, the feature of generating constant current output has been added to the implantable pulse generators (IPGs). The efficacy of the conventionally used constant voltage (CV) stimulation has been proved in different movement and psychiatric disorders. In this systematic review, we aimed to discuss the effect of constant current (CC) and constant voltage stimulation on patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who had subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation implantation; we also compared these methods of stimulation with each other.
Using the words "Deep brain stimulation", "constant current" and "constant voltage", we developed a broad search strategy and a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases. Studies on the Parkinson's disease patients with subthalamic deep brain stimulation, which mentioned constant current or/and constant voltage setting stimulation were included.
After screening of 284 articles, 10 reports were found eligible for this study. The score of unified Parkinson's disease rating scale part 3 was improved compared to the baseline, whether the stimulation was CV at baseline or CC. No significant change in non-motor outcomes was found.
Although CC stimulation has shown a significant improvement in both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD, switching from CV to CC did not result in a significant change in the score of these items based on UPDRS. To sum up, implantation of constant current devices is safe and significantly improves motor function; it also maintains an acceptable safety profile in patients with PD.
最近,植入式脉冲发生器(IPG)增加了产生恒流输出的功能。传统使用的恒压(CV)刺激的疗效已在不同的运动和精神疾病中得到证实。在本系统评价中,我们旨在探讨恒流(CC)和恒压刺激对接受丘脑底核深部脑刺激植入的帕金森病(PD)患者的影响;我们还对这些刺激方法进行了相互比较。
使用“深部脑刺激”、“恒流”和“恒压”等词,我们制定了广泛的检索策略,并在PubMed、Scopus、科学网和Cochrane电子文献数据库中进行了系统检索。纳入了对接受丘脑底核深部脑刺激的帕金森病患者进行的研究,这些研究提到了恒流或/和恒压设置刺激。
在筛选了284篇文章后,发现10篇报告符合本研究的条件。无论基线刺激是CV还是CC,统一帕金森病评定量表第3部分的评分均较基线有所改善。未发现非运动结局有显著变化。
虽然CC刺激在PD的运动和非运动症状方面均显示出显著改善,但从CV转换为CC并没有导致基于UPDRS的这些项目评分出现显著变化。总之,植入恒流装置是安全的,能显著改善运动功能;在PD患者中也保持了可接受的安全性。