• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Learning curve analysis of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion].[单侧双门内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的学习曲线分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 15;36(10):1229-1233. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202205139.
2
[Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive tubular transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease].单侧双孔通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与微创管状经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 May 15;36(5):592-599. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201005.
3
[Prospective comparative study of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis].[单侧双孔通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症伴腰椎滑脱的前瞻性对比研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):521-528. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402058.
4
[Research of learning curves for unilateral biportal endoscopy technique and associated postoperative adverse events].[单侧双孔道内镜技术学习曲线及相关术后不良事件的研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 15;36(10):1221-1228. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202205133.
5
[Comparative study of decompression of unilateral biportal endoscopic compared to laminectomy with fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双门内镜减压术与椎板切除融合内固定术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Nov 8;102(41):3281-3287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220720-01583.
6
[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].[单侧双通道内镜减压与单侧双通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的疗效比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 15;38(2):169-175. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202311025.
7
[Short-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for Meyerding degree Ⅰ or Ⅱ single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis].[单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗迈耶丁Ⅰ度或Ⅱ度单节段腰椎滑脱症的短期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 15;36(10):1207-1212. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202205126.
8
[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].单侧双通道内镜与单通道椎间孔内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 15;38(3):324-330. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202312029.
9
Unilateral biportal endoscopic extreme transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with large cage combined with endoscopic unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a technical note and preliminary effects.单侧双通道内镜下使用大型椎间融合器行极外侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术联合内镜下单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病:技术要点及初步疗效
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Jan;165(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05422-4. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
10
Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion verse 3D microscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 24-month follow-up.单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与 3D 显微镜辅助下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄的临床对比:一项 24 个月随访的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04401-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning curve insights in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) spinal procedures: proficiency cutoffs and the impact on efficiency and complications.单侧双通道内镜(UBE)脊柱手术中的学习曲线见解:熟练程度阈值及其对效率和并发症的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):954-973. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08632-9. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
2
Unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a meta-analysis unveiling the learning curve and clinical benefits.单侧双孔道内镜脊柱手术:一项揭示学习曲线和临床益处的荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 7;11:1405519. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1405519. eCollection 2024.
3
The Method of Portal Making in Lumbar Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Surgery with Different Operative Approaches According to the Constant Anatomical Landmarks of the Lumbar Spine: A Review of the Literature.基于腰椎恒定解剖标志采用不同手术入路的腰椎单侧双孔通道内镜手术中通道建立方法:文献综述
Global Spine J. 2024 Jul;14(6):1838-1861. doi: 10.1177/21925682241230465. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion verse 3D microscope-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study with 24-month follow-up.单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与 3D 显微镜辅助下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄的临床对比:一项 24 个月随访的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 8;18(1):943. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04401-4.
5
Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与传统椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 24;24(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06949-y.
6
Comparison of efficacy between unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎融合术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 25;102(34):e34705. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034705.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease.微创与双通道内窥镜经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗单节段腰椎疾病的比较。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Mar 1;34(2):E64-E71. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001024.
2
[Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between two approaches in treatment of single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis].两种入路微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段腰椎管狭窄症的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):807-813. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201903096.
3
Is the Use of a Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approach Associated with Rapid Recovery After Lumbar Decompressive Laminectomy? A Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎减压术后快速康复?一项前瞻性随机对照试验的初步分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e709-e718. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.240. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Resident Involvement in Microsurgery: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.住院医师参与显微手术:美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划分析。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):1124-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-indications and clinical experience.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术——适应证与临床经验
Neurol India. 2016 May-Jun;64(3):444-54. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.181536.
6
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Hue Zhang concerning "A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle" by A. Colak et al. (2008) Eur Spine J; 17:1745-1751.对张辉致编辑信的回复,该信涉及A. 科拉克等人(2008年)发表于《欧洲脊柱杂志》(Eur Spine J)第17卷第1745 - 1751页的文章“腰椎外侧隐窝狭窄症的一种侵入性较小的手术方法:直接进入椎弓根内侧壁” 。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Jun;24(6):1324-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3909-y. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
7
Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis.临床实践。腰椎管狭窄症。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):818-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0708097.

[单侧双门内镜下腰椎椎间融合术的学习曲线分析]

[Learning curve analysis of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion].

作者信息

Wang Ning, Bei Chaoyong, Wan Jian, Wang Honggang

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College, Guilin Guangxi, 541000, P. R. China.

Department of Trauma Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College, Guilin Guangxi, 541000, P. R. China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 15;36(10):1229-1233. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202205139.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202205139
PMID:36310459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9626269/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the learning curve of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF).

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with UBE-LIF between December 2020 and February 2022 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were grouped according to the operation sequence, the first 27 cases were in the early group, and the last 28 cases were in the late group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, disease type, and surgical segment distribution ( >0.05). The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss (the difference between 1 day before operation and 3 days after operation), the hospital stay after operation, and the incidence of perioperative complications were recorded; the learning curve of UBE-LIF was analyzed by log-curve regression analysis.

RESULTS

All the operations were successfully completed without changing to other operations. The operation time, the amount of hemoglobin loss, and hospital stay in the early group were significantly more than those in the late group ( <0.05). Complications occurred in 2 cases (7.4%) in the early group, including 1 case of dural tear during operation and 1 case of epidural hematoma after operation, and 1 case (3.6%) with transient radiculitis in the late group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( =0.518) . The log-curve regression analysis showed that the operation time decreased significantly with the increase of the number of patients ( <0.05). The operation time tended to be stable after the surgeon completed 17 cases.

CONCLUSION

For single-level lumbar degenerative disease, the operation time of UBE-LIF can decrease gradually with the increase of the number of patients, and tend to be stable after 17 cases.

摘要

目的

分析单侧双通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合术(UBE-LIF)的学习曲线。

方法

选取2020年12月至2022年2月期间接受UBE-LIF治疗的55例单节段腰椎退行性疾病患者作为研究对象。根据手术顺序将患者分组,前27例为早期组,后28例为晚期组。两组在年龄、性别、疾病类型和手术节段分布方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。记录手术时间、血红蛋白丢失量(术前1天与术后3天的差值)、术后住院时间及围手术期并发症发生率;采用对数曲线回归分析UBE-LIF的学习曲线。

结果

所有手术均顺利完成,未转为其他术式。早期组的手术时间、血红蛋白丢失量和住院时间均显著多于晚期组(P<0.05)。早期组发生并发症2例(7.4%),包括术中硬膜撕裂1例和术后硬膜外血肿1例,晚期组发生1例(3.6%)短暂性神经根炎。两组并发症发生率无显著差异(P=0.518)。对数曲线回归分析显示,手术时间随患者例数增加而显著缩短(P<0.05)。术者完成17例手术后手术时间趋于稳定。

结论

对于单节段腰椎退行性疾病,UBE-LIF的手术时间可随患者例数增加而逐渐缩短,17例后趋于稳定。