• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测急性缺血性卒中后检测到的心房颤动的列线图。

A nomogram for predicting atrial fibrillation detected after acute ischemic stroke.

作者信息

Pang Ming, Li Zhuanyun, Sun Lin, Zhao Na, Hao Lina

机构信息

Neuroelectrophysiology Room, Function Department, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Cangzhou, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 14;13:1005885. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1005885. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2022.1005885
PMID:36313507
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9614087/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation detected after stroke (AFDAS) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) recurrence and death. Early diagnosis can help identify strategies for secondary prevention and improve prognosis. However, there are no validated predictive tools to assess the population at risk for AFDAS. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for assessing the incidence of AFDAS after acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

METHODS

This study was a multicenter retrospective study. We collected clinical data from 5332 patients with AIS at two hospitals between 2014.01 and 2021.12 and divided the development and validation of clinical prediction models into a training cohort ( = 3173) and a validation cohort ( = 2159). Characteristic variables were selected from the training cohort using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A nomogram model was developed, and its performance was evaluated regarding calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility.

RESULTS

We found the best subset of risk factors based on clinical characteristics and laboratory variables, including age, congestive heart failure (CHF), previous AIS/transient ischemia attack (TIA), national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) score, C-reactive protein (CRP), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). A predictive model was developed. The model showed good calibration and discrimination, with calibration values of Hosmer-Lemeshow χ = 4.813, = 0.732 and Hosmer-Lemeshow χ = 4.248, = 0.834 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.815, 95% CI (0.777-0.853) and 0.808, 95% CI (0.770-0.847). The inclusion of neuroimaging variables significantly improved the performance of the integrated model in both the training cohort (AUC. 0.846 (0.811-0.882) vs. 0.815 (0.777-0.853), = 0.001) and the validation cohort (AUC: 0.841 (0.804-0.877) vs. 0.808 (0.770-0.847), = 0.001). The decision curves showed that the integrated model added more net benefit in predicting the incidence of AFDAS.

CONCLUSION

Predictive models based on clinical characteristics, laboratory variables, and neuroimaging variables showed good calibration and high net clinical benefit, informing clinical decision-making in diagnosing and treating patients with AFDAS.

摘要

背景

卒中后房颤(AFDAS)与缺血性卒中(IS)复发及死亡风险增加相关。早期诊断有助于确定二级预防策略并改善预后。然而,尚无经过验证的预测工具来评估AFDAS的高危人群。因此,本研究旨在开发并验证一种预测模型,以评估急性缺血性卒中(AIS)后AFDAS的发生率。

方法

本研究为多中心回顾性研究。我们收集了2014年1月至2021年12月期间两家医院5332例AIS患者的临床数据,并将临床预测模型的开发和验证分为训练队列(n = 3173)和验证队列(n = 2159)。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)算法及多变量逻辑回归分析从训练队列中选择特征变量。开发了列线图模型,并对其校准、区分度和临床实用性进行了评估。

结果

我们基于临床特征和实验室变量找到了最佳风险因素子集,包括年龄、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、既往AIS/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、C反应蛋白(CRP)和B型利钠肽(BNP)。开发了一种预测模型。该模型显示出良好的校准和区分度,训练队列和验证队列中的Hosmer-Lemeshow χ²值分别为4.813,P = 0.732和4.248,P = 0.834。ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.815,95%CI(0.777 - 0.853)和0.808,95%CI(0.770 - 0.847)。纳入神经影像学变量显著改善了综合模型在训练队列(AUC:0.846(0.811 - 0.882)对0.815(0.777 - 0.853),P = 0.001)和验证队列(AUC:0.841(0.804 - 0.877)对0.808(0.770 - 0.847),P = 0.001)中的性能。决策曲线表明,综合模型在预测AFDAS发生率方面增加了更多净效益。

结论

基于临床特征、实验室变量和神经影像学变量的预测模型显示出良好的校准和较高的净临床效益,为AFDAS患者的诊断和治疗提供临床决策依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/2e346e94cfaf/fneur-13-1005885-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/31e69651e2a7/fneur-13-1005885-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/ebd62376e8de/fneur-13-1005885-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/e8367982b743/fneur-13-1005885-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/a8b9a7655db7/fneur-13-1005885-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/2bc64989fb5a/fneur-13-1005885-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/a53bb34b85ec/fneur-13-1005885-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/fc495c3abba7/fneur-13-1005885-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/af2705a3cf64/fneur-13-1005885-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/2e346e94cfaf/fneur-13-1005885-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/31e69651e2a7/fneur-13-1005885-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/ebd62376e8de/fneur-13-1005885-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/e8367982b743/fneur-13-1005885-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/a8b9a7655db7/fneur-13-1005885-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/2bc64989fb5a/fneur-13-1005885-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/a53bb34b85ec/fneur-13-1005885-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/fc495c3abba7/fneur-13-1005885-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/af2705a3cf64/fneur-13-1005885-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cc4/9614087/2e346e94cfaf/fneur-13-1005885-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
A nomogram for predicting atrial fibrillation detected after acute ischemic stroke.一种用于预测急性缺血性卒中后检测到的心房颤动的列线图。
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 14;13:1005885. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1005885. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for aspiration in patients with acute ischemic stroke.开发和验证急性缺血性脑卒中患者吸入风险预测模型。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jun;124:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.04.022. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Clinical scoring model based on age, NIHSS, and stroke-history predicts outcome 3 months after acute ischemic stroke.基于年龄、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)和卒中病史的临床评分模型可预测急性缺血性卒中3个月后的预后。
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 5;13:935150. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.935150. eCollection 2022.
4
A Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.列线图预测维持性血液透析患者发生急性缺血性脑卒中的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2024;14(1):46-57. doi: 10.1159/000539015. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
Development and Validation of a New Nomogram Model for Predicting Acute Ischemic Stroke in Elderly Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.开发和验证一种新的列线图模型预测非瓣膜性心房颤动老年患者急性缺血性脑卒中:一项单中心横断面研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Jan 10;19:67-79. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S437065. eCollection 2024.
6
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model Based on LASSO Regression: Predicting the Risk of Early Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.基于套索回归的预测模型的开发与验证:预测射频导管消融术后房颤早期复发风险
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 8;13(22):3403. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223403.
7
Risk prediction of preoperative acute ischemic stroke in acute type A aortic dissection.急性 A 型主动脉夹层术前急性缺血性脑卒中的风险预测。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Oct;33(10):7250-7259. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09691-0. Epub 2023 May 13.
8
Developing and Validating a Nomogram Model for Predicting Ischemic Stroke Risk.开发并验证用于预测缺血性中风风险的列线图模型。
J Pers Med. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):777. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070777.
9
Development and Validation of a Dynamic Nomogram for Predicting 3-Month Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.预测合并心房颤动的急性缺血性卒中患者3个月死亡率的动态列线图的开发与验证
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jan 16;17:145-158. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S442353. eCollection 2024.
10
[Preliminary exploration of clinical prediction model of severe swallowing disorder after acute ischemic stroke based on nomogram model].基于列线图模型的急性缺血性卒中后严重吞咽障碍临床预测模型的初步探索
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Apr;35(4):371-375. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220525-00512.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence for prediction of atrial fibrillation in the stroke unit: a retrospective derivation validation cohort study.卒中单元中用于预测心房颤动的人工智能:一项回顾性推导验证队列研究。
EBioMedicine. 2025 Aug;118:105869. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105869. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
2
Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurocardiology: a comprehensive review.人工智能与机器学习在神经心脏病学中的临床应用:综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 3;12:1525966. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1525966. eCollection 2025.
3
Stroke-heart syndrome: current progress and future outlook.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of Risk Scores for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Detected After Stroke Based on an Electronic Medical Record Algorithm: A Registry-Claims-Electronic Medical Record Linked Data Study.基于电子病历算法预测卒中后检测到的心房颤动的风险评分验证:一项登记-索赔-电子病历关联数据研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 29;9:888240. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.888240. eCollection 2022.
2
Risk Estimation of Infectious and Inflammatory Disorders in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Clinical-Lab Nomogram.使用临床实验室列线图对急性缺血性卒中住院患者感染和炎症性疾病的风险评估
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 10;12:710144. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.710144. eCollection 2021.
3
中风-心脏综合征:当前的进展与未来展望。
J Neurol. 2024 Aug;271(8):4813-4825. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12480-4. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
Predicting atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke via a clinical risk score-a prospective observational study.
通过临床风险评分预测隐源性卒中后的心房颤动:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Jan;29(1):149-157. doi: 10.1111/ene.15102. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
4
Management of Atrial Fibrillation in 2021: An Updated Comparison of the Current CCS/CHRS, ESC, and AHA/ACC/HRS Guidelines.2021年心房颤动的管理:当前加拿大心血管学会/加拿大心律学会(CCS/CHRS)、欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)以及美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心律学会(AHA/ACC/HRS)指南的更新比较
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Oct;37(10):1607-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
5
Blood biomarkers to detect new-onset atrial fibrillation and cardioembolism in ischemic stroke patients.用于检测缺血性脑卒中患者新发心房颤动和心源性栓塞的血液生物标志物。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jun;18(6):855-861. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
6
New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis: A Narrative Review.脓毒症相关性新发心房颤动:一篇叙述性综述。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021 Feb;47(1):18-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714400. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Discovery of Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke: A Subanalysis of the Find-AF Trial.脑利钠肽与脑卒中后心房颤动的发现:Find-AF 试验的亚组分析。
Stroke. 2020 Feb;51(2):395-401. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026496. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
8
The importance of selected markers of inflammation and blood-brain barrier damage for short-term ischemic stroke prognosis.炎症和血脑屏障损伤的选定标志物对短暂性脑缺血发作预后的重要性。
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;70(2). doi: 10.26402/jpp.2019.2.04. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
Atrial Fibrillation Known Before or Detected After Stroke Share Similar Risk of Ischemic Stroke Recurrence and Death.房颤在卒中前或卒中后确诊具有相似的缺血性卒中复发和死亡风险。
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1124-1129. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024176.
10
Timing of anticoagulation after recent ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.近期缺血性脑卒中合并心房颤动患者抗凝治疗的时机。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jan;18(1):117-126. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30356-9. Epub 2018 Nov 8.