Suppr超能文献

截肢平面选择的非侵入性技术的前瞻性比较。

Prospective comparison of noninvasive techniques for amputation level selection.

作者信息

Malone J M, Anderson G G, Lalka S G, Hagaman R M, Henry R, McIntyre K E, Bernhard V M

出版信息

Am J Surg. 1987 Aug;154(2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(87)90174-7.

Abstract

This study prospectively compared the following tests for their accuracy in amputation level selection: transcutaneous oxygen, transcutaneous carbon dioxide, transcutaneous oxygen-to-transcutaneous carbon dioxide, foot-to-chest transcutaneous oxygen, intradermal xenon-133, ankle-brachial index, and absolute popliteal artery Doppler systolic pressure. All metabolic parameters had a high degree of statistical accuracy in predicting amputation healing whereas none of the other tests had statistical reliability. Amputation site healing was not affected by the presence of diabetes mellitus nor were the test results for any of the metabolic parameters.

摘要

本研究前瞻性地比较了以下测试在截肢水平选择方面的准确性

经皮氧分压、经皮二氧化碳分压、经皮氧分压与经皮二氧化碳分压之比、足部至胸部经皮氧分压、皮内氙-133、踝肱指数以及腘动脉绝对多普勒收缩压。所有代谢参数在预测截肢愈合方面具有高度的统计准确性,而其他测试均无统计可靠性。截肢部位的愈合不受糖尿病存在与否的影响,任何代谢参数的测试结果也不受其影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验