University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Learn Disabil. 2023 Nov-Dec;56(6):467-482. doi: 10.1177/00222194221131569. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
The Triangle Model of Reading proposes that phonology, orthography, and semantics are crucial to understand word reading and reading disability (RD). Morphology has been added as a binding agent to this model. However, it is unclear how these variables relate to word reading in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or comorbid ADHD and RD (ADHD+RD). This study examined the performance of Chinese children with RD, ADHD, or ADHD+RD in phonology, orthography, semantics, and morphology, and investigated whether morphology made an additional contribution beyond the other skills in explaining word reading fluency. Participants were 151 Grade 1 to 3 Chinese students: RD ( = 31), ADHD ( = 43), ADHD+RD ( = 27), and typically developing controls (TD, = 50). Results indicated that children with ADHD+RD (a) showed similar performance to RD and ADHD in tone awareness, orthographic legality, and homophone morpheme awareness; (b) had similar performance to RD but worse than ADHD in phonology, semantics, and morpheme production; and (c) had more severe deficits than RD and ADHD in orthographic reversal, morpheme identification, and homograph awareness. Morphology significantly predicted word reading fluency beyond the other skills, and its predictive effect was more salient for ADHD+RD, ADHD, and TD. The findings provide evidence of both shared and additive effects of RD and ADHD. Morphology may be an important diagnostic factor in identifying Chinese reading and behavioral deficit groups and a worthwhile target for intervention.
阅读的三角模型提出,语音、正字法和语义对于理解单词阅读和阅读障碍(RD)至关重要。形态学已被添加为该模型的结合剂。然而,目前尚不清楚这些变量与注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)或合并 ADHD 和 RD(ADHD+RD)的儿童的单词阅读有何关系。本研究考察了中国 RD、ADHD 或 ADHD+RD 儿童在语音、正字法、语义和形态学方面的表现,并探讨了形态学在解释单词阅读流畅性方面是否比其他技能有额外的贡献。参与者是 151 名 1 至 3 年级的中国学生:RD(n=31)、ADHD(n=43)、ADHD+RD(n=27)和典型发展对照组(TD,n=50)。结果表明,ADHD+RD 组的儿童(a)在声调意识、正字法合法性和同音字形态意识方面与 RD 和 ADHD 表现相似;(b)在语音、语义和形态生成方面与 RD 表现相似,但比 ADHD 差;(c)在正字法反转、形态识别和同形词意识方面比 RD 和 ADHD 表现出更严重的缺陷。形态学在预测单词阅读流畅性方面明显优于其他技能,并且对 ADHD+RD、ADHD 和 TD 的预测效果更为显著。这些发现为 RD 和 ADHD 的共同和附加效应提供了证据。形态学可能是识别中文阅读和行为缺陷群体的重要诊断因素,也是干预的一个有价值的目标。