Moyer-Gusé Emily, Rader Kara, Lavis Simon
School of Communication, The Ohio State University, 43210-1339, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
NORC, The University of Chicago, 60637, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Health Commun. 2022 Aug 3;27(8):585-592. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2138641. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
The current study considers how an entertainment narrative about childhood vaccination influences related attitudes. We consider the role of counterarguing in narrative persuasion by integrating extant research and theory to test cognitive mechanisms of narrative persuasion, namely self-referencing and positive issue-related thoughts. Results of this experiment show that exposure to a television narrative depicting the importance of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine led to more favorable attitudes toward childhood vaccination as compared to a control group. As expected by narrative persuasion theorizing, transportation into the narrative predicted vaccine attitudes. In contrast to typical theorizing and some empirical results, counterarguing did not mediate that relationship, however, self-referencing and positive issue-related thinking did. Theoretical contributions and suggestions for future research expanding our understanding of issue-related thoughts are discussed.
当前的研究探讨了关于儿童疫苗接种的娱乐性叙事如何影响相关态度。我们通过整合现有研究和理论来检验叙事说服的认知机制,即自我参照和与积极问题相关的想法,以此来考量反驳在叙事说服中的作用。该实验结果表明,与对照组相比,观看描绘麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗重要性的电视叙事会使人们对儿童疫苗接种产生更积极的态度。正如叙事说服理论所预期的那样,沉浸于叙事之中能够预测对疫苗的态度。与典型理论及一些实证结果不同的是,反驳并未在这种关系中起到中介作用,然而,自我参照和与积极问题相关的思考却起到了中介作用。本文还讨论了理论贡献以及对未来研究的建议,这些研究将扩展我们对与问题相关想法的理解。