Meng Xing-Chen, Guo Xin-Xin, Peng Zhen-Yan, Wang Chun, Liu Ran
Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, No. 87, Ding jia-qiao, Gu-lou District, Nanjing 210009, P.R. China.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Mar 27;30(5):425-435. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac248.
The effects of e-cigarettes on endothelial function remained controversial. The study aimed to investigate the effects of e-cigarettes on vascular endothelial function.
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to December 2021. We only included the studies in which the control group included vaping without nicotine and tobacco. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted for flow-mediated dilation (FMD), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and heart rate corrected augmentation index (AIx75). Eight studies involving 372 participants were eligible for this review. Compared with vaping without nicotine, e-cigarettes significantly increase in PWV (mean difference = 3.09; 95% confidential interval: 1.51-4.68, P < 0.001) and AIx75 (mean difference = 2.11; 95% confidential interval: 1.02-3.21, P < 0.001) indicators, but not affect FMD (mean difference = 0.78; 95% confidential interval: -0.08 to 1.64, P = 0.075). But compared with traditional tobacco, e-cigarettes did not affect FMD (mean difference = 0.28, 95% confidential interval: -0.45 to 0.59, P = 0.084). According to surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), the e-cigarette ranked first for FMD (SUCRA = 97%), tobacco ranked first for PWV (SUCRA = 75%), and AIx75 (SUCRA = 99%).
In summary, evidence from our pooled analyses indicated that acute inhalation of e-cigarettes leads to negative changes in vascular endothelial function. E-cigarettes cannot be used as an alternative to public health strategies for tobacco control and should not be considered cardiovascular safety products. More future research should be conducted to verify our findings.
电子烟对内皮功能的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在调查电子烟对血管内皮功能的影响。
检索截至2021年12月的PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。我们仅纳入了对照组包括无尼古丁电子烟和烟草的研究。对血流介导的血管舒张(FMD)、脉搏波速度(PWV)和心率校正增强指数(AIx75)进行成对和网络荟萃分析。八项涉及372名参与者的研究符合本综述的条件。与无尼古丁电子烟相比,电子烟显著增加PWV(平均差异 = 3.09;95%置信区间:1.51 - 4.68,P < 0.001)和AIx75(平均差异 = 2.11;95%置信区间:1.02 - 3.21,P < 0.001)指标,但不影响FMD(平均差异 = 0.78;95%置信区间:-0.08至1.64,P = 0.075)。但与传统烟草相比,电子烟不影响FMD(平均差异 = 0.28,95%置信区间:-0.45至0.59,P = 0.084)。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA),电子烟在FMD方面排名第一(SUCRA = 97%),烟草在PWV方面排名第一(SUCRA = 75%),在AIx75方面排名第一(SUCRA = 99%)。
总之,我们汇总分析的证据表明,急性吸入电子烟会导致血管内皮功能出现负面变化。电子烟不能作为烟草控制公共卫生策略的替代品,不应被视为心血管安全产品。未来应进行更多研究以验证我们的发现。