Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, #111 Daoshan Road, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):10407-10420. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07433-4. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear.
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8).
For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.
达比加群、阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和依度沙班等直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)预防和治疗癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。
我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 11 月 30 日。在基于频率的网络荟萃分析中,报告了 95%置信区间的比值比。根据累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)生成每组的相对排序概率。
我们纳入了 15 项随机对照试验,共纳入 6162 例患者。与低分子肝素相比,阿哌沙班降低了 VTE 的风险[比值比=0.53,95%可信区间(0.32,0.89)]。药物的疗效排名从高到低依次为:阿哌沙班(SUCRA,81.0)、利伐沙班(73.0)、依度沙班(65.9)、达比加群(51.4)、华法林(30.8)和低分子肝素(LMWH)(27.4)。与 LMWH 相比,依度沙班增加了大出血的风险[比值比=1.83,95%可信区间(1.04,3.22)]。药物的安全性排名从高到低依次为:大出血-阿哌沙班(SUCRA,68.5)、LMWH(55.1)、利伐沙班(53.0)、华法林(35.9)、达比加群(29.2)、依度沙班(16.5)和临床相关非大出血-LMWH(73.0)、阿哌沙班(57.8)、依度沙班(45.8)、利伐沙班(35.3)和华法林(10.8)。
在预防和治疗 VTE 方面,阿哌沙班发生 VTE 和大出血的风险最低;在临床相关非大出血方面,LMWH 风险最低,其次是阿哌沙班。总体而言,阿哌沙班是最有效和最安全的 DOAC,在癌症患者的 VTE 预防和治疗药物中具有更好的疗效和相对较低的出血风险。