Pipek Leonardo Zumerkorn, Nascimento Rafaela Farias Vidigal, Coronel Sabrina Isabel, Baker Mark, Basto Fernando Mayor, Silva Guilherme Diogo
Division of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Division of Neurology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03847-1.
The risk of stroke among patients with cancer is two times that of the general population due to a combination of cancer-, chemotherapy-, radiotherapy-, and surgery-related factors. There is a paucity of data regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy for secondary stroke prevention in these patients.
Our goal was to review the stroke recurrence in patients treated with different antithrombotic therapies (antiplatelets, warfarin, heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants). Our secondary objective was to review the bleeding risk across different antithrombotic therapies.
A review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles that adequately assessed secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cancer were selected from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception until March 2, 2025. We performed a network meta-analysis for stroke recurrence, major bleeding, and mortality. The treatments were ranked by P-SCORE. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on median D-dimer levels, multiple territories of stroke, and exclusion of studies with high risk of bias.
We included 11 studies (four RCTs, six retrospective studies, and one case series) with a total of 1319 patients. In the primary analysis, antiplatelets were the highest-ranked treatment for reducing stroke recurrence (RR 0.44 [0.20; 0.96]), followed by LMWH (RR 0.50 [0.26; 0.96]), both significantly superior to no treatment. However, LMWH consistently ranked higher than antiplatelets in all subgroup analyses. There was no difference regarding major bleeding or mortality.
Antiplatelets can be considered an option for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with cancer, especially in patients with a higher bleeding risk. Future research with high-quality studies is needed to confirm our preliminary findings and should focus on identifying subgroups of patients with cancer who may benefit most from specific antithrombotic therapies.
由于癌症、化疗、放疗和手术相关因素的综合作用,癌症患者中风的风险是普通人群的两倍。关于这些患者二级预防中风的最佳抗栓治疗的数据匮乏。
我们的目标是回顾接受不同抗栓治疗(抗血小板药物、华法林、肝素和直接口服抗凝剂)的患者的中风复发情况。我们的次要目标是回顾不同抗栓治疗的出血风险。
根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行文献综述。从PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库自创建至2025年3月2日选择充分评估癌症患者中风二级预防的文章。我们对中风复发、大出血和死亡率进行了网状Meta分析。治疗方法按P值排序。基于D-二聚体水平中位数、中风的多个区域以及排除高偏倚风险的研究进行亚组分析。
我们纳入了11项研究(4项随机对照试验、6项回顾性研究和1项病例系列),共1319例患者。在初步分析中,抗血小板药物是降低中风复发的最高排名治疗方法(风险比0.44[0.20;0.96]),其次是低分子肝素(风险比0.50[0.26;0.96]),两者均显著优于不治疗。然而,在所有亚组分析中,低分子肝素的排名始终高于抗血小板药物。在大出血或死亡率方面没有差异。
抗血小板药物可被视为癌症患者中风二级预防的一种选择,尤其是出血风险较高的患者。需要高质量研究的未来研究来证实我们的初步发现,并且应侧重于确定可能从特定抗栓治疗中获益最大的癌症患者亚组。