Skaria Teny Grace, Sreeprakash Anu, Umesh Rashwith, Joseph Sneha, Mohan Manju, Ahmed Sakir, Mehta Pankti, Oommen Seena Elsa, Benny Jannet, Paulose Anagha, Paul Aby, George Justin, Sukumaran Aswathy, Babu Sageer S, Navas Safna, Vijayan Anuroopa, Joseph Sanjana, Nalianda Kaveri K, Narayanan Krishnan, Shenoy Padmanabha
Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatism Excellence, Kochi, India.
Sree Sudheendra Medical Mission, Kochi, India.
Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Nov;4(11):e755-e764. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00228-4. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
There is a necessity for an optimal COVID-19 vaccination strategy for vulnerable population groups, including people with autoimmune inflammatory arthritis on immunosuppressants such as methotrexate, which inhibit vaccine-induced immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Thus, we aimed to assess the effects of withholding methotrexate for 2 weeks after each dose of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccine (MIVAC I) or only after the second dose of vaccine (MIVAC II) compared with continuation of methotrexate, in terms of post-vaccination antibody titres and disease flare rates.
MIVAC I and II were two parallel, independent, assessor-masked, randomised trials. The trials were done at a single centre (Dr Shenoy's Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatism Excellence; Kochi, India) in people with either rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis with stable disease activity, who had been on a fixed dose of methotrexate for the preceding 6 weeks. Those with previous COVID-19 or who were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies were excluded from the trials. People on high-dose corticosteroids and rituximab were also excluded, whereas other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were allowed. In MIVAC I, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to stop methotrexate treatment for 2 weeks after each vaccine dose or to continue methotrexate treatment. In MIVAC II, participants who had continued methotrexate during the first dose of vaccine were randomly assigned (1:1) to withhold methotrexate for 2 weeks after the second dose of vaccine or to continue to take methotrexate. The treating physician was masked to the group assignments. The primary outcome for both MIVAC I and MIVAC II was the titre (absolute value) of anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody measured 4 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. All analyses were done per protocol. The trials were registered with the Clinical Trials Registry- India, number CTRI/2021/07/034639 (MIVAC I) and CTRI/2021/07/035307 (MIVAC II).
Between July 6 and Dec 15, 2021, participants were recruited to the trials. In MIVAC I, 250 participants were randomly assigned and 158 completed the study as per the protocol (80 in the methotrexate hold group and 78 in the control group; 148 [94%] were women and 10 [6%] were men). The median post-vaccination antibody titres in the methotrexate hold group were significantly higher compared with the control group (2484·0 IU/mL, IQR 1050·0-4388·8 1147·5 IU/mL, 433·5-2360·3; p=0·0014). In MIVAC II, 178 participants were randomly assigned and 157 completed the study per protocol (76 in the methotrexate hold group and 81 in the control group; 135 [86%] were women and 22 [14%] were men). The methotrexate hold group had higher post-vaccination antibody titres compared with the control group (2553·5 IU/ml, IQR 1792·5-4823·8 990·5, 356·1-2252·5; p<0·0001). There were no reports of any serious adverse events during the trial period.
Withholding methotrexate after both ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine doses and after only the second dose led to higher anti-RBD antibody titres compared with continuation of methotrexate. However, withholding methotrexate only after the second vaccine dose resulted in a similar humoral response to holding methotrexate after both vaccine doses, without an increased risk of arthritis flares. Hence, interruption of methotrexate during the second dose of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine appears to be a safe and effective strategy to improve the antibody response in patients with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis.
Indian Rheumatology Association.
对于包括正在使用甲氨蝶呤等免疫抑制剂的自身免疫性炎性关节炎患者在内的弱势群体,有必要制定优化的新冠病毒疫苗接种策略,因为这些免疫抑制剂会抑制针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的疫苗诱导免疫。因此,我们旨在评估与继续使用甲氨蝶呤相比,在每次接种ChAdOx1 nCov-19(牛津-阿斯利康)疫苗后停用甲氨蝶呤2周(MIVAC I)或仅在第二剂疫苗后停用甲氨蝶呤(MIVAC II)对疫苗接种后抗体滴度和疾病复发率的影响。
MIVAC I和MIVAC II是两项平行、独立、评估者设盲的随机试验。试验在印度科钦的谢诺伊卓越关节炎与风湿病中心这一单一中心进行,受试者为类风湿关节炎或银屑病关节炎患者,疾病活动稳定,在过去6周一直使用固定剂量的甲氨蝶呤。既往感染过新冠病毒或抗SARS-CoV-2核衣壳抗体呈阳性的患者被排除在试验之外。高剂量皮质类固醇和利妥昔单抗使用者也被排除,而其他改善病情的抗风湿药物使用者则被允许入组。在MIVAC I中,参与者被随机分配(1:1)在每次接种疫苗后停用甲氨蝶呤治疗2周或继续甲氨蝶呤治疗。在MIVAC II中,在第一剂疫苗接种期间继续使用甲氨蝶呤的参与者被随机分配(1:1)在第二剂疫苗接种后停用甲氨蝶呤2周或继续服用甲氨蝶呤。治疗医生对分组情况不知情。MIVAC I和MIVAC II的主要结局都是在第二剂疫苗接种后4周测量的抗受体结合域(RBD)抗体滴度(绝对值)。所有分析均按照方案进行。试验已在印度临床试验注册中心注册,注册号分别为CTRI/2021/07/034639(MIVAC I)和CTRI/2021/07/035307(MIVAC II)。
2021年7月6日至12月15日,参与者被招募入试验。在MIVAC I中,250名参与者被随机分配,158名按方案完成研究(甲氨蝶呤停用组80名,对照组78名;148名[94%]为女性,10名[6%]为男性)。甲氨蝶呤停用组接种疫苗后的抗体滴度中位数显著高于对照组(2484.0 IU/mL,四分位间距1050.0 - 4388.8 1147.5 IU/mL,433.5 - 2360.3;p = 0.0014)。在MIVAC II中,178名参与者被随机分配,157名按方案完成研究(甲氨蝶呤停用组76名,对照组81名;135名[86%]为女性,22名[14%]为男性)。甲氨蝶呤停用组接种疫苗后的抗体滴度高于对照组(2553.5 IU/ml,四分位间距1792.5 - 4823.8 990.5,356.1 - 2252.5;p < 0.0001)。试验期间没有任何严重不良事件的报告。
与继续使用甲氨蝶呤相比,在两剂ChAdOx1 nCov-19疫苗接种后以及仅在第二剂接种后停用甲氨蝶呤均导致更高的抗RBD抗体滴度。然而仅在第二剂疫苗接种后停用甲氨蝶呤产生的体液反应与两剂疫苗接种后均停用甲氨蝶呤相似,且关节炎复发风险未增加。因此,在第二剂ChAdOx1 nCov-19疫苗接种期间中断甲氨蝶呤治疗似乎是一种安全有效的策略,可改善类风湿关节炎或银屑病关节炎患者的抗体反应。
印度风湿病协会