• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同温度下的烹饪和干燥过程对贻贝(紫贻贝)蛋白质营养价值的影响]

[Influence of cooking and drying processes at different temperatures on the nutritive value of the protein of mussels (Mytilus edulis)].

作者信息

Lema M L, del Pilar Navarro M, Mataix F J, Varela G

出版信息

Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1986 Sep;36(3):495-504.

PMID:3632222
Abstract

The effect of steam cooking (96 degrees C for 15 minutes) and drying at two temperatures, 70 degrees C and 110 degrees C, on nutritive value of mussel protein was studied. The measurements were carried out by nitrogen balance techniques in growing rats, and the nutritional parameters studied were: CD, BV and NPU. The crude digestibility (CD) values were: 87 +/- 1 and 82 +/- 1, and the biological values (BV), 80 +/- 1 and 74 +/- 1 for raw mussels, dried at 70 degrees C and at 110 degrees C respectively. This implies a significant decrease in the protein nutritive values of the mussel dried at a higher temperature. Cooking prior to drying significantly improved the digestibility and the biological value of the mussel's protein. In effect, improvement was so great, that the different drying temperatures did not affect the previously cooked product in a different way; therefore, the CD (94 +/- 1 and 94 +/- 1) and the BV (90 +/- 1 and 90 +/- 2) were the same for the mussel's protein, cooked and dried at 70 degrees C or at 110 degrees C.

摘要

研究了蒸汽烹饪(96摄氏度,15分钟)以及在70摄氏度和110摄氏度两个温度下干燥对贻贝蛋白质营养价值的影响。通过氮平衡技术在生长大鼠中进行测量,所研究的营养参数为:粗消化率(CD)、生物利用率(BV)和净蛋白质利用率(NPU)。生贻贝的粗消化率(CD)值分别为87±1和82±1,生物利用率(BV)值分别为80±1和74±1,分别对应于在70摄氏度和110摄氏度下干燥的贻贝。这意味着在较高温度下干燥的贻贝蛋白质营养价值显著降低。干燥前进行烹饪显著提高了贻贝蛋白质的消化率和生物利用率。实际上,提高幅度非常大,以至于不同的干燥温度对之前烹饪过的产品没有产生不同的影响;因此,在70摄氏度或110摄氏度下烹饪并干燥的贻贝蛋白质的粗消化率(CD)(94±1和94±1)和生物利用率(BV)(90±1和90±2)是相同的。

相似文献

1
[Influence of cooking and drying processes at different temperatures on the nutritive value of the protein of mussels (Mytilus edulis)].[不同温度下的烹饪和干燥过程对贻贝(紫贻贝)蛋白质营养价值的影响]
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1986 Sep;36(3):495-504.
2
Effect of processing on the protein nutritional value of Canavalia gladiata seeds.加工对刀豆种子蛋白质营养价值的影响。
Nahrung. 2003 Aug;47(4):256-60. doi: 10.1002/food.200390060.
3
Effects of dehulling, cooking and storage conditions on protein quality and digestibility of soybeans.脱壳、烹饪和储存条件对大豆蛋白质质量和消化率的影响。
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1995 Mar;45(1):41-5.
4
Effect of blanching and drying temperatures on the physicochemical characteristics, dietary fiber composition and antioxidant-related parameters of dried persimmons peel powder.烫漂和干燥温度对柿饼皮粉理化特性、膳食纤维组成及抗氧化相关参数的影响。
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2010 Nov;61(7):702-12. doi: 10.3109/09637481003757852.
5
Nutritional and physicochemical characteristics of Asiatic hard clam powder prepared by different cook-drying processes: a comparative study.不同煮干工艺制备的文蛤粉的营养成分和理化特性:比较研究。
J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Jul;104(9):5104-5113. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13347. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
6
Effect of soaking, germination, autoclaving and cooking on chemical and biological value of guar compared with faba bean.与蚕豆相比,浸泡、发芽、高压灭菌和烹饪对瓜尔豆化学和生物学价值的影响。
Nahrung. 2001 Aug;45(4):246-50. doi: 10.1002/1521-3803(20010801)45:4<246::AID-FOOD246>3.0.CO;2-F.
7
Nutritional improvement of Lobia (Phaseolus vulgaris) by supplementation with poultry, mutton and beef meat.通过添加家禽肉、羊肉和牛肉来改善豆薯(菜豆)的营养。
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2001 Nov;52(6):521-6.
8
[Effect of processing and amino acids supplementation on the protein quality of amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus)].[加工及氨基酸添加对苋属植物(尾穗苋)蛋白质质量的影响]
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1987 Mar;37(1):161-73.
9
[Effect of various extrusion conditions on the protein quality of soybean and whole rye meal].[不同挤压条件对大豆和全黑麦粉蛋白质品质的影响]
Z Ernahrungswiss. 1985 Jun;24(2):85-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02020455.
10
[Nutritive value of raw and processed cowpeas].
Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1982 Sep;32(3):543-58.