Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Jun;52(3):641-648. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5356. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the predictive values of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Creatinine Index (CI) in the short-term mortality of maintenance hemodialysis patients and to determine their best cut-offs.
A total of 169 adult hemodialysis patients were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional, and single-center study. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the month in which the patients were included in the study were obtained from their medical files and computer records. All-cause death was the primary outcome of the study during a 12-month follow-up after baseline GNRI and CI calculations.
The mean age of the study population was 57 ± 16 years (49.7% were women, 15% were diabetic). During the one-year observation period, 19 (11.24%) of the cases died (8 CV deaths). The optimal cut-off value for GNRI was determined as 104.2 by ROC analysis [AUC = 0.682 ± 0.06, (95% CI, 0.549-0.815), p = 0.01]. The low GNRI group had a higher risk for all-cause and CV mortality compared to the higher GNRI group (p = 0.02 for both in log-rank test). The optimal sex-specific cut-off was 12.18 mg/kg/day for men [AUC = 0.723 ± 0.07, (95% CI, 0.574-0.875), p = 0.03] and was 12.08 mg/kg/day for females [AUC = 0.649 ± 0.13, (95% CI, 0.384- 0.914), p = 0.01]. Patients with lower sex-specific CI values had higher all-cause and CV mortality (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009 in log-rank test, respectively). In multivariate cox models, both GNRI [HR = 4.904 (% 95 CI, 1.77-13.56), p = 0.002] and sex-specific CI [HR = 5.1 (95% CI, 1.38-18.9), p = 0.01] predicted all-cause mortality. The association of GNRI with CV was lost [HR = 2.6 (CI 95%, 0.54-13.455), p = 0.22], but low CI had a very strong association with CV mortality [HR = 11.48 (CI 95%, 1.25 -104), p = 0.03].
In hemodialysis patients, GNRI and CI have similar powers in predicting all-cause short-term mortality. The association of CI with all-cause death depends on gender. On the other hand, sex-specific CI predicts CV mortality better than GNRI.
本研究旨在分析和比较老年营养风险指数(GNRI)和肌酐指数(CI)在维持性血液透析患者短期死亡率中的预测价值,并确定其最佳截断值。
本回顾性、横断面、单中心研究纳入了 169 名成年血液透析患者。通过患者病历和计算机记录获取纳入研究当月的人口统计学、临床和实验室数据。所有原因死亡是研究的主要终点,在基线 GNRI 和 CI 计算后进行为期 12 个月的随访。
研究人群的平均年龄为 57±16 岁(49.7%为女性,15%为糖尿病患者)。在一年的观察期内,19 例(11.24%)患者死亡(8 例心血管死亡)。通过 ROC 分析确定 GNRI 的最佳截断值为 104.2[AUC=0.682±0.06,(95%CI,0.549-0.815),p=0.01]。与 GNRI 较高组相比,GNRI 较低组的全因和心血管死亡率更高(对数秩检验,p=0.02 和 p=0.02)。最佳性别特异性截断值为男性 12.18mg/kg/天[AUC=0.723±0.07,(95%CI,0.574-0.875),p=0.03],女性 12.08mg/kg/天[AUC=0.649±0.13,(95%CI,0.384-0.914),p=0.01]。较低性别特异性 CI 值的患者全因和心血管死亡率更高(对数秩检验,p=0.001 和 p=0.009)。在多变量 Cox 模型中,GNRI[HR=4.904(95%CI,1.77-13.56),p=0.002]和性别特异性 CI[HR=5.1(95%CI,1.38-18.9),p=0.01]均预测全因死亡率。GNRI 与心血管疾病的相关性丧失[HR=2.6(95%CI 95%,0.54-13.455),p=0.22],但低 CI 与心血管死亡率有很强的相关性[HR=11.48(95%CI 95%,1.25-104),p=0.03]。
在血液透析患者中,GNRI 和 CI 在预测全因短期死亡率方面具有相似的能力。CI 与全因死亡的相关性取决于性别。另一方面,性别特异性 CI 比 GNRI 更好地预测心血管死亡率。