Instituto de Agrobiotecnología (CSIC-Gobierno de Navarra), Mutilva Baja, Spain.
Universidad Pública de Navarra, Mutilva Baja, Spain.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0175922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01759-22. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
Brucellosis, a re-emerging zoonotic infection, threatens animal welfare and public health with serious economic consequences. A definitive diagnosis requires Brucella isolation by culturing field specimens in specific media. This study aimed to (i) assess the effectivity of recommended Farrell's médium (FM) and CITA medium (CM) for the isolation of four Brucella melitensis strains (16M, Rev1, and the 16MΔ and Rev1Δ in-frame deletion mutants) with variable susceptibility to polymyxins; (ii) develop a Brucella selective medium (BSM) suitable for these strains; (iii) test BSM, FM, and CM with other Brucella species; and (iv) develop an improved selective culture medium (SIC) for all brucellae, including B. abortus bv1. The four B. melitensis strains were strongly inhibited in FM and (except Rev1) CM. Since Rev1Δ's CM inhibition was due to a synergistic effect of colistin and vancomycin, we formulated BSM with half the concentrations of both antibiotics, achieving a similar growth of B. melitensis to blood agar base (BAB) and an inhibition of contaminant microorganisms comparable to CM; CM performance was surpassed by BSM for the primary isolation of B. melitensis when tested in 1,789 real sheep samples. For other brucellae, BSM and CM were more inhibitory than FM for B. abortus bv1 when using plates immediately after preparation but not after ≥4 weeks of storage. To address this, we developed the improved solid medium SIC by replacing the calf serum in BSM with activated charcoal. SIC yielded faster colony growth than BSM and CM and similar CFU numbers than BAB (including for B. ovis in BAB-Serum) and inhibited accompanying microorganisms in sheep and cow samples as effectively as BSM. Farrell's medium (FM) and CITA medium (CM), recommended for Brucella isolation in animal samples, are inhibitory for certain strains. A reformulated Brucella selective medium (BSM), containing half the CM vancomycin and colistin concentrations, improved the isolation of B. melitensis, but not Brucella abortus bv1. A novel Brucella selective culture medium (SIC), in which calf serum is replaced by activated charcoal, retains the selectivity and improves the productivity of BSM and CM. SIC allows the growth of all brucellae faster than in CM or BSM, and at CFU number equivalent to BAB supplemented by calf serum, including B. abortus bv1 and the serum-dependent Brucella ovis. Due to its performance and reduced cost, SIC represents an added-value alternative to the existing selective culture media for these bacteria.
布鲁氏菌病是一种重新出现的人畜共患病感染,对动物福利和公共卫生构成严重威胁,并带来严重的经济后果。明确的诊断需要通过在特定培养基中培养现场标本来分离布鲁氏菌。本研究旨在:(i)评估推荐的 Farrell 培养基(FM)和 CITA 培养基(CM)对四种布鲁氏菌 melitensis 菌株(16M、Rev1 以及 16MΔ和 Rev1Δ 框内缺失突变体)分离的效果,这些菌株对多粘菌素的敏感性不同;(ii)开发适合这些菌株的布鲁氏菌选择性培养基(BSM);(iii)用其他布鲁氏菌物种测试 BSM、FM 和 CM;(iv)为所有布鲁氏菌,包括布鲁氏菌 abortus bv1,开发一种改良的选择性培养(SIC)。四种布鲁氏菌 melitensis 菌株在 FM 和(除 Rev1 外)CM 中受到强烈抑制。由于 Rev1Δ 的 CM 抑制是由于多粘菌素和万古霉素的协同作用,我们用这两种抗生素的一半浓度来配制 BSM,实现了与血液琼脂基础(BAB)相似的布鲁氏菌 melitensis 生长,并抑制了 CM 中类似的污染物微生物;在对 1789 份实际绵羊样本进行的初步分离中,BSM 的性能优于 CM。对于其他布鲁氏菌,BSM 和 CM 在使用立即制备的平板时对布鲁氏菌 abortus bv1 的抑制作用强于 FM,但在储存≥4 周后则弱于 FM。为了解决这个问题,我们通过用活性炭代替 BSM 中的牛血清来开发改良的固体培养基 SIC。SIC 比 BSM 和 CM 产生更快的菌落生长速度,与 BAB(包括 BAB-Serum 中的布鲁氏菌 ovis)产生的 CFU 数量相似,并与 BSM 一样有效地抑制绵羊和牛样本中的伴随微生物。 Farrell 培养基(FM)和 CITA 培养基(CM)推荐用于动物样本中布鲁氏菌的分离,但对某些菌株具有抑制作用。一种改良的布鲁氏菌选择性培养基(BSM),其中含有 CM 万古霉素和多粘菌素浓度的一半,提高了布鲁氏菌 melitensis 的分离效果,但对布鲁氏菌 abortus bv1 没有效果。一种新的布鲁氏菌选择性培养(SIC),其中用活性炭代替牛血清,保留了 BSM 和 CM 的选择性,并提高了它们的生产力。SIC 使所有布鲁氏菌的生长速度比 CM 或 BSM 更快,并且在 CFU 数量上与补充牛血清的 BAB 相当,包括布鲁氏菌 abortus bv1 和依赖血清的布鲁氏菌 ovis。由于其性能和降低的成本,SIC 是这些细菌现有选择性培养物的一种增值替代物。