Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 24;192(3):323-327. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac192.
Epidemiological training often requires specialization in a subdiscipline (e.g., pharmacoepidemiology, genetic epidemiology, social epidemiology, or infectious disease epidemiology). While specialization is necessary and beneficial, it comes at the cost of decreased awareness of scientific developments in other subdisciplines of epidemiology. In this commentary, we argue for the importance of promoting an exchange of ideas across seemingly disparate epidemiologic subdisciplines. Such an exchange can lead to invaluable opportunities to learn from and merge knowledge across subdisciplines. It can promote "innovation at the edges," a process of borrowing and transforming methods from one subdiscipline in order to develop something new and advance another subdiscipline. Further, we outline specific actionable steps at the researcher, institution, and professional society level that can promote such innovation.
流行病学培训通常需要在一个子学科(如药物流行病学、遗传流行病学、社会流行病学或传染病流行病学)专业化。虽然专业化是必要的和有益的,但它会导致对其他流行病学子学科的科学发展的认识减少。在这篇评论中,我们认为有必要促进看似不同的流行病学子学科之间的思想交流。这种交流可以带来宝贵的机会,从不同的子学科中学习和融合知识。它可以促进“边缘创新”,即从一个子学科借用和转化方法,以开发新的东西并推进另一个子学科。此外,我们还概述了研究人员、机构和专业学会层面可以促进这种创新的具体可行步骤。