• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
International benchmarking of childhood cancer survival by stage at diagnosis: The BENCHISTA project protocol.国际儿童癌症诊断时分期的生存基准比较:BENCHISTA 项目方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0276997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276997. eCollection 2022.
2
Cancer data quality and harmonization in Europe: the experience of the BENCHISTA Project - international benchmarking of childhood cancer survival by stage.欧洲癌症数据质量与协调:BENCHISTA项目的经验——儿童癌症生存按阶段的国际基准评估
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 22;13:1232451. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1232451. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the feasibility and validity of the Toronto Childhood Cancer Stage Guidelines: a population-based registry study.评估《多伦多儿童癌症分期指南》的可行性和有效性:一项基于人群的登记研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):173-179. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30023-3. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Collecting routine and timely cancer stage at diagnosis by implementing a cancer staging tiered framework: the Western Australian Cancer Registry experience.通过实施癌症分期分层框架来收集常规和及时的诊断癌症分期:西澳大利亚癌症登记处的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 28;24(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11224-4.
5
Italian cancer figures, report 2012: Cancer in children and adolescents.《2012年意大利癌症数据报告:儿童和青少年癌症》
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1 Suppl 1):1-225.
6
Temporal changes in childhood cancer incidence and survival by stage at diagnosis in Australia, 2000-2017.澳大利亚 2000-2017 年按诊断时分期划分的儿童癌症发病率和生存的时间变化。
Acta Oncol. 2023 Oct;62(10):1256-1264. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2251668. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
7
Development of paediatric non-stage prognosticator guidelines for population-based cancer registries and updates to the 2014 Toronto Paediatric Cancer Stage Guidelines.制定基于人群的癌症登记处的儿科非分期预后指南和更新 2014 年多伦多儿科癌症分期指南。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):e444-e451. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30320-X.
8
Staging childhood cancers in Europe: Application of the Toronto stage principles for neuroblastoma and Wilms tumour. The JARC pilot study.欧洲儿童癌症分期:神经母细胞瘤和肾母细胞瘤的多伦多分期原则的应用。JARC 初步研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Sep;68(9):e29020. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29020. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
9
An application of the Toronto Childhood Cancer Stage Guidelines in three population-based cancer registries: The case of central nervous tumors.多伦多儿童癌症分期指南在三个基于人群的癌症登记处的应用:中枢神经系统肿瘤的案例。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Jun;67(6):e28303. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28303. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
10
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.

引用本文的文献

1
The Population-Level Surveillance of Childhood and Adolescent Cancer and Its Late Effects in Europe with an Example of an Effective System at the Slovenian Cancer Registry.欧洲儿童和青少年癌症及其晚期效应的人群水平监测——以斯洛文尼亚癌症登记处的一个有效系统为例
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;17(4):580. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040580.
2
Feasibility and stage at diagnosis for children with cancer: a pilot study on population-based data in a middle-income country using the Toronto childhood cancer stage guidelines.癌症患儿的诊断可行性及诊断阶段:一项使用多伦多儿童癌症分期指南对中等收入国家基于人群的数据进行的试点研究。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Nov 6;18:1795. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1795. eCollection 2024.
3
Making the Case for an International Childhood Cancer Data Partnership.推动建立国际儿童癌症数据伙伴关系的理由。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Jan 12. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaf003.
4
Cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis in children and adolescents in the Community of Madrid, 2015-2018.2015 - 2018年马德里自治区儿童和青少年癌症的发病率及诊断时的分期
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 4;39(5):445-55. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13144.
5
Use Cases Requiring Privacy-Preserving Record Linkage in Paediatric Oncology.儿科肿瘤学中需要隐私保护记录链接的用例。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 29;16(15):2696. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152696.
6
Cancer data quality and harmonization in Europe: the experience of the BENCHISTA Project - international benchmarking of childhood cancer survival by stage.欧洲癌症数据质量与协调:BENCHISTA项目的经验——儿童癌症生存按阶段的国际基准评估
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 22;13:1232451. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1232451. eCollection 2023.
7
Cancer incidence and type of treatment hospital among children, adolescents, and young adults in Japan, 2016-2018.日本儿童、青少年和青年 2016-2018 年癌症发病率和治疗医院类型。
Cancer Sci. 2023 Sep;114(9):3770-3782. doi: 10.1111/cas.15892. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
8
Cancer treatment data available in European cancer registries: Where are we and where are we going?欧洲癌症登记处提供的癌症治疗数据:我们现在的状况以及未来的发展方向?
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 8;13:1109978. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1109978. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
CanStaging+: an electronic staging tool for population-based cancer registries.CanStaging+:一种用于基于人群的癌症登记处的电子分期工具。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1069. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00188-1.
2
Staging childhood cancers in Europe: Application of the Toronto stage principles for neuroblastoma and Wilms tumour. The JARC pilot study.欧洲儿童癌症分期:神经母细胞瘤和肾母细胞瘤的多伦多分期原则的应用。JARC 初步研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021 Sep;68(9):e29020. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29020. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
Data protection and research in the European Union: a major step forward, with a step back.欧盟的数据保护与研究:向前迈出一大步,却又后退一步。
Ann Oncol. 2021 Jan;32(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.472. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Development of paediatric non-stage prognosticator guidelines for population-based cancer registries and updates to the 2014 Toronto Paediatric Cancer Stage Guidelines.制定基于人群的癌症登记处的儿科非分期预后指南和更新 2014 年多伦多儿科癌症分期指南。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):e444-e451. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30320-X.
5
Social Inequalities Along the Childhood Cancer Continuum: An Overview of Evidence and a Conceptual Framework to Identify Underlying Mechanisms and Pathways.儿童癌症全程中的社会不平等:证据概述及识别潜在机制和途径的概念框架
Front Public Health. 2019 Apr 18;7:84. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00084. eCollection 2019.
6
Stage at diagnosis for childhood solid cancers in Australia: A population-based study.澳大利亚儿童实体瘤诊断时分期:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;59:208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
7
Survival is influenced by approaches to local treatment of Ewing sarcoma within an international randomised controlled trial: analysis of EICESS-92.在一项国际随机对照试验中,尤因肉瘤的局部治疗方法对生存率有影响:EICESS-92分析
Clin Sarcoma Res. 2018 Mar 30;8:6. doi: 10.1186/s13569-018-0093-y. eCollection 2018.
8
Paediatric cancer stage in population-based cancer registries: the Toronto consensus principles and guidelines.基于人群的癌症登记处的儿科癌症分期:多伦多共识原则和指南。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):e163-e172. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00539-2. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Evidence for a delay in diagnosis of Wilms' tumour in the UK compared with Germany: implications for primary care for children.与德国相比,英国威尔姆斯瘤诊断延迟的证据:对儿童初级保健的影响。
Arch Dis Child. 2016 May;101(5):417-20. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309212. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
10
Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5--a population-based study.欧洲 1999-2007 年儿童癌症生存情况:EUROCARE-5 的研究结果——一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jan;15(1):35-47. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

国际儿童癌症诊断时分期的生存基准比较:BENCHISTA 项目方案。

International benchmarking of childhood cancer survival by stage at diagnosis: The BENCHISTA project protocol.

机构信息

Fondazione IRCCS "Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano", INT, Milan, Italy.

UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0276997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276997. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0276997
PMID:36327231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9632762/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown significant variation in overall survival rates from childhood cancer between countries, using population-based cancer registry (PBCR) data for all cancers combined and for many individual tumour types among children. Without accurate and comparable data on Tumour stage at diagnosis, it is difficult to define the reasons for these survival differences. This is because measurement systems designed for adult cancers do not apply to children's cancers and cancer registries often hold limited information on paediatric tumour stage and the data sources used to define it.

AIMS

The BENCHISTA project aims to test the application of the international consensus "Toronto Staging Guidelines" (TG) for paediatric tumours by European and non-European PBCRs for six common paediatric solid tumours so that reliable comparisons of stage at diagnosis and survival rates by stage can be made to understand any differences. A secondary aim is to test the data availability and completeness of collection of several 'Toronto' consensus non-stage prognostic factors, treatment types given, occurrence of relapse/progression and cause of death as a descriptive feasibility study.

METHODS

PBCRs will use their permitted data access channels to apply the Toronto staging guidelines to all incident cases of six solid childhood cancers (medulloblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewings sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma and Wilms tumour) diagnosed in a consecutive three-year period within 2014-2017 in their population. Each registry will provide a de-identified patient-level dataset including tumour stage at diagnosis, with only the contributing registry holding the information that would be needed to re-identify the patients. Where available to the registry, patient-level data on 'Toronto' non-stage prognostic factors, treatments given and clinical outcomes (relapse/progression/cause of death) will be included. More than 60 PBCRs have been involved in defining the patient-level dataset items and intend to participate by contributing their population-level data. Tumour-specific on-line training workshops with clinical experts are available to cancer registry staff to assist them in applying the Toronto staging guidelines in a consistent manner. There is also a project-specific help desk for discussion of difficult cases and promotion of the CanStaging online tools, developed through the International Association of Cancer Registries, to further ensure standardisation of data collection. Country-specific stage distribution and observed survival by stage at diagnosis will be calculated for each tumour type to compare survival between countries or large geographical regions.

DISCUSSION

This study will be promote and enhance the collection of standardized staging data for childhood cancer by European and non-European population-based cancer registries. Therefore, this project can be seen as a feasibility project of widespread use of Toronto Staging at a population-level by cancer registries, specifying the data sources used and testing how well standardized the processes can be. Variation in tumour stage distribution could be due to real differences, to different diagnostic practices between countries and/or to variability in how cancer registries assign Toronto stage. This work also aims to strengthen working relationships between cancer registries, clinical services and cancer-specific clinical study groups, which is important for improving patient outcomes and stimulating research.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,使用基于人群的癌症登记处(PBCR)数据,对所有癌症进行汇总,并对儿童的许多个别肿瘤类型进行汇总,各国之间的儿童癌症总生存率存在显著差异。如果没有关于诊断时肿瘤分期的准确和可比数据,就很难确定这些生存差异的原因。这是因为为成人癌症设计的测量系统不适用于儿童癌症,癌症登记处通常只掌握有限的小儿肿瘤分期信息及其用于定义分期的数据源。

目的

BENCHISTA 项目旨在通过欧洲和非欧洲 PBCR 测试国际共识“多伦多分期指南”(TG)在六种常见儿童实体瘤中的应用,以便能够可靠地比较诊断时的分期和按分期划分的生存率,以了解任何差异。第二个目的是测试几个“多伦多”共识非分期预后因素、所给治疗类型、复发/进展的发生和死亡原因的收集的可用数据和完整性,作为描述性可行性研究。

方法

PBCR 将使用其允许的数据访问渠道,将多伦多分期指南应用于其人群中 2014-2017 年连续三年期间诊断的六种固体儿童癌症(髓母细胞瘤、骨肉瘤、尤文肉瘤、横纹肌肉瘤、神经母细胞瘤和肾母细胞瘤)的所有连续病例。每个登记处将提供一个去识别的患者水平数据集,包括诊断时的肿瘤分期,只有参与登记处拥有重新识别患者所需的信息。在登记处可获得的情况下,将包括患者水平的“多伦多”非分期预后因素、所给治疗和临床结果(复发/进展/死亡原因)的数据。已有 60 多个 PBCR 参与定义患者水平数据集项目,并打算通过提供其人群水平数据来参与。为癌症登记处工作人员提供了针对特定肿瘤的在线培训研讨会,以协助他们以一致的方式应用多伦多分期指南。还有一个专门针对项目的服务台,用于讨论困难病例并推广国际癌症登记协会开发的 CanStaging 在线工具,以进一步确保数据收集的标准化。将为每个肿瘤类型计算特定国家的分期分布和按诊断时分期的观察生存率,以比较国家或大地理区域之间的生存率。

讨论

这项研究将通过欧洲和非欧洲基于人群的癌症登记处促进和加强儿童癌症标准化分期数据的收集。因此,该项目可以被视为癌症登记处在人群层面上广泛使用多伦多分期的可行性项目,指定所使用的数据源,并测试标准化过程的效果如何。肿瘤分期分布的差异可能是由于实际差异、国家间不同的诊断实践以及癌症登记处分配多伦多分期的方式的差异所致。这项工作还旨在加强癌症登记处、临床服务和特定癌症临床研究小组之间的工作关系,这对于改善患者结局和刺激研究非常重要。