• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对“拒绝水烟”宣传视频的态度:脸书评论内容分析

Attitudes towards the 'Shisha No Thanks' campaign video: Content analysis of Facebook comments.

作者信息

Chan Lilian, Harris-Roxas Ben, Freeman Becky, MacKenzie Ross, Woodland Lisa, O'Hara Blythe J

机构信息

Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Oct 18;20:88. doi: 10.18332/tid/153543. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.18332/tid/153543
PMID:36330277
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9578129/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While social media are commonly used in public health campaigns, there is a gap in our understanding of what happens after the campaign is seen by the target audience. This study aims to understand how the campaign video was received by the Facebook audience by analyzing Facebook comments posted to it. Specifically, this study aims to determine whether the Facebook audience accepted or rejected the campaign's message.

METHODS

A sample of the Facebook comments was extracted, and the study team, which included cultural support workers, developed content categories consistent with the research question. Each comment was then coded by three team members, and only assigned a category if there was agreement by at least two members.

RESULTS

Of the 4990 comments that were sampled, 9.1% (456) accepted the campaign message, 22.9% (1144) rejected the message, 21.8% (1089) were unclear, and 46.1% (2301) contained only tagged names. Of the sample, 2.8% (138) indicated the commenter took on board the campaign message by expressing an intention to stop smoking shisha, or asking a friend to stop smoking shisha. Of the comments that showed rejection of the campaign, the majority were people dismissing the campaign by laughing at it or expressing pro-shisha sentiments.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that conducting content analyses of social media comments can provide important insight into how a campaign message is received by a social media audience.

摘要

引言

虽然社交媒体常用于公共卫生运动,但在我们对目标受众看到运动内容后所发生情况的理解上存在差距。本研究旨在通过分析发布在脸书上的评论来了解脸书用户对运动视频的接受情况。具体而言,本研究旨在确定脸书用户是接受还是拒绝该运动所传达的信息。

方法

抽取了脸书评论的一个样本,研究团队(包括文化支持人员)制定了与研究问题一致的内容类别。然后由三名团队成员对每条评论进行编码,只有在至少两名成员达成一致的情况下才会被归类。

结果

在抽取的4990条评论中,9.1%(456条)接受了运动信息,22.9%(1144条)拒绝了该信息,21.8%(1089条)不明确,46.1%(2301条)仅包含标记的名字。在样本中,2.8%(138条)表明评论者通过表达戒烟水烟的意图或要求朋友戒烟水烟来接受运动信息。在显示拒绝该运动的评论中,大多数人通过嘲笑或表达支持水烟的情绪来驳回该运动。

结论

本研究表明,对社交媒体评论进行内容分析可以为了解社交媒体受众如何接受运动信息提供重要见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b1/9578129/ad472ff39379/TID-20-88-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b1/9578129/e0a5c9a5d059/TID-20-88-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b1/9578129/ad472ff39379/TID-20-88-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b1/9578129/e0a5c9a5d059/TID-20-88-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65b1/9578129/ad472ff39379/TID-20-88-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Attitudes towards the 'Shisha No Thanks' campaign video: Content analysis of Facebook comments.对“拒绝水烟”宣传视频的态度:脸书评论内容分析
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Oct 18;20:88. doi: 10.18332/tid/153543. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of 'Shisha No Thanks' - a co-design social marketing campaign on the harms of waterpipe smoking.“拒绝水烟”评估——一项关于水烟吸食危害的联合设计社会营销活动。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12792-y.
3
Earned media and public engagement with CDC's "Tips from Former Smokers" campaign: an analysis of online news and blog coverage.自有媒体与公众对美国疾病控制与预防中心“前吸烟者的小贴士”活动的参与:在线新闻与博客报道分析
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 20;17(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3645.
4
Public Response to a Social Media Tobacco Prevention Campaign: Content Analysis.公众对社交媒体烟草预防活动的反应:内容分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 7;6(4):e20649. doi: 10.2196/20649.
5
Content analysis of responses to The Line, an Australian primary prevention of violence against women campaign on Facebook.对澳大利亚预防针对妇女暴力的初级预防运动“红线”(The Line)在 Facebook 上的回应进行内容分析。
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Oct;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):340-348. doi: 10.1002/hpja.589. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
6
Strengthening the Merci Mon Héros Campaign Through Adaptive Management: Application of Social Listening Methodology.通过自适应管理加强“谢谢我的英雄”活动:社会倾听方法的应用。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jun 28;8(6):e35663. doi: 10.2196/35663.
7
The Use of Facebook Advertising for Communicating Public Health Messages: A Campaign Against Drinking During Pregnancy in New Zealand.利用脸书广告传播公共卫生信息:新西兰一项针对孕期饮酒的宣传活动。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Aug 10;3(3):e49. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7032.
8
The portrayal and perceptions of cesarean section in Mexican media Facebook pages: a mixed-methods study.墨西哥媒体 Facebook 页面中对剖宫产的描述和看法:一项混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01351-8.
9
Social Media Use for Public Health Campaigning in a Low Resource Setting: The Case of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking.低资源环境下利用社交媒体开展公共卫生运动:以水烟吸食为例。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:562586. doi: 10.1155/2015/562586. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
10
Public Response on Social Media to a Social Marketing Campaign for Influencing Attitudes towards Boating Safety.社交媒体上公众对社会营销活动的反应,以影响对划船安全的态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;18(12):6504. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126504.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of 'Shisha No Thanks' - a co-design social marketing campaign on the harms of waterpipe smoking.“拒绝水烟”评估——一项关于水烟吸食危害的联合设计社会营销活动。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12792-y.
2
Evaluation of a Social Media Campaign Designed to Increase Awareness of Thirdhand Smoke among California Adults.评估一项旨在提高加利福尼亚成年人对三手烟认识的社交媒体宣传活动。
Health Commun. 2023 Mar;38(3):437-446. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1954760. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
3
Topics of Nicotine-Related Discussions on Twitter: Infoveillance Study.
关于 Twitter 上尼古丁相关讨论的主题:信息监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 7;23(6):e25579. doi: 10.2196/25579.
4
#FlavorsSaveLives: An Analysis of Twitter Posts Opposing Flavored E-cigarette Bans.#FlavorsSaveLives:反对调味电子烟禁令的 Twitter 帖子分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 4;23(8):1431-1435. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa276.
5
Tobacco cessation experiences and needs: perspectives from Arabic-speaking communities.戒烟经验和需求:阿拉伯语社区的观点。
J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2022 Jul-Sep;21(3):1010-1028. doi: 10.1080/15332640.2020.1824837. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Review of Evaluation Metrics Used in Digital and Traditional Tobacco Control Campaigns.数字和传统烟草控制运动中使用的评估指标综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e17432. doi: 10.2196/17432.
7
Social media and HPV vaccination: Unsolicited public comments on a Facebook post by the Western Cape Department of Health provide insights into determinants of vaccine hesitancy in South Africa.社交媒体和 HPV 疫苗接种:对西开普省卫生部 Facebook 帖子的非官方公众意见提供了南非疫苗犹豫决定因素的见解。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 8;37(43):6317-6323. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
8
The association of waterpipe tobacco smoking with later initiation of cigarette smoking: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the gateway theory.水烟吸食与后期开始吸食卷烟之间的关联:一项探索“入门理论”的系统评价和荟萃分析
Tob Control. 2019 Jul 30. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054870.
9
Water Pipe (Hookah) Smoking and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.水烟(水烟壶)吸烟与心血管疾病风险:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2019 May 7;139(19):e917-e936. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000671.
10
Shaping interventions to address waterpipe smoking in Arabic-speaking communities in Sydney, Australia: a qualitative study.在澳大利亚悉尼的阿拉伯裔社区中开展干预措施以解决水烟吸烟问题:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):1379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6270-3.