Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Hodgkin Building, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Hodgkin Building, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107322. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107322. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Over 20% of women aged 50-64 in Britain have not attended cervical screening within the recommended 5-year interval. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of five messages, informed using strategies from the Behaviour Change Wheel, on strength of intention to attend cervical screening in women aged 50-64 with weak positive intentions to be screened when next invited. Women were randomised (2:2:1), into one of two intervention groups or a control group. The control group saw basic information about cervical screening. Intervention group 1 saw a social norms message and an outcome expectancy message. Intervention group 2 saw a risk reduction message and a response efficacy message. There was further randomisation within the two intervention groups (1:1) to test the effectiveness of message framing and age-targeted information. Lastly, both intervention groups were randomised (1:1) to see a message acknowledging the possible discomfort associated with screening and offering support, or the support message only. Data were included from 475 women, collected using an online survey in March 2022. Adjusting for baseline intention, social norms (p = .84), outcome expectancy (p = .51), risk reduction (p = .19), response efficacy (p = .23) and discomfort acknowledgement messages (p = .71) had no effect on intention strength. However, there was a significant increase in intention after reading multiple messages. These results suggest that although no single message has a significant impact on intentions, when combined, they may act together to increase intention strength. Further research will understand the impact of these messages when combined in information materials.
英国 50-64 岁的女性中,超过 20%的人未能在建议的 5 年间隔内接受宫颈筛查。本研究旨在调查五种信息的影响,这些信息是使用行为改变车轮的策略提供的,以了解对 50-64 岁、有微弱积极筛查意向但下次被邀请时可能不会去筛查的女性进行宫颈筛查的意向强度。女性被随机分为两组干预组(2:2:1)或对照组。对照组看到了关于宫颈筛查的基本信息。干预组 1 看到了社会规范信息和结果预期信息。干预组 2 看到了降低风险信息和反应效能信息。在两个干预组内进一步随机分配(1:1),以测试信息框架和年龄针对性信息的有效性。最后,两个干预组都被随机分配(1:1),以查看一条承认与筛查相关的可能不适并提供支持的信息,或仅查看支持信息。数据来自 2022 年 3 月使用在线调查收集的 475 名女性。调整基线意向后,社会规范(p=.84)、结果预期(p=.51)、降低风险(p=.19)、反应效能(p=.23)和不适承认消息(p=.71)对意向强度没有影响。然而,阅读多条消息后,意向强度显著增加。这些结果表明,虽然没有单一消息对意向有显著影响,但当组合使用时,它们可能会共同作用,增加意向强度。进一步的研究将了解这些消息在信息材料中组合使用时的影响。