• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查全国范围内短信和移动消息在人群筛查中的实施情况(SIPS 研究)。

Investigating the national implementation of SMS and mobile messaging in population screening (The SIPS study).

机构信息

Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.

Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2023 Jul;93:104685. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104685. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104685
PMID:37384997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10320235/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing use of mobile messaging within healthcare, poses challenges for screening programmes, which involve communicating with large, diverse populations. This modified Delphi study aimed to create guidance regarding the use of mobile messaging for screening programmes, to facilitate greater, and equitable screening uptake.

METHODS

Initial recommendations were derived from a literature review, expert scoping questionnaire, public consultation, and discussion with relevant national organisations. Experts from the fields of public health, screening commissioning, industry and academia voted upon the importance and feasibility of these recommendations across two consensus rounds, using a 5-point Likert scale. Items reaching consensus, defined a priori at 70%, on importance and feasibility formed 'core' recommendations. Those reaching this threshold on importance only, were labelled 'desirable'. All items were subsequently discussed at an expert meeting to confirm suitability.

FINDINGS

Of the initial 101 items, 23 reached consensus regarding importance and feasibility. These 'core' items were divided across six domains: message content, timing, delivery, evaluation, security, and research considerations. 'Core' items such as explicitly specifying the sender and the role of patient involvement in development of screening message research had the highest agreement. A further 17 'desirable' items reached consensus regarding importance, but not feasibility, including the integration into GP services to enable telephone verification.

INTERPRETATION

These findings forming national guidance for services, will enable programmes to overcome implementation challenges and facilitate uptake of screening invitations. By providing a list of desirable items, this study provides areas for future consideration, as technological innovation in messaging continues to grow.

FUNDING

NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre.

摘要

背景

移动信息在医疗保健中的使用日益增多,给涉及与大量不同人群进行沟通的筛查项目带来了挑战。本改良德尔菲研究旨在制定有关使用移动信息进行筛查项目的指南,以促进更大、更公平的筛查参与度。

方法

最初的建议源自文献回顾、专家范围界定问卷调查、公众咨询以及与相关国家组织的讨论。公共卫生、筛查委托、行业和学术界的专家使用 5 点李克特量表,在两轮共识投票中对这些建议的重要性和可行性进行投票。在重要性和可行性上达到事先设定的 70%共识的项目构成了“核心”建议。仅在重要性上达到这一阈值的项目被标记为“可取”。所有项目随后在专家会议上进行讨论,以确认其适用性。

结果

最初的 101 项中有 23 项在重要性和可行性方面达成了共识。这些“核心”项目分为六个领域:信息内容、时间安排、传递、评估、安全性和研究考虑。明确指定发件人和患者在筛查信息研究开发中的角色等“核心”项目得到了最高的共识。还有 17 项“可取”项目在重要性上达成了共识,但在可行性上没有达成共识,包括纳入全科医生服务以实现电话验证。

解释

这些发现为服务制定了国家指南,将使项目能够克服实施挑战,促进筛查邀请的参与度。通过提供一系列可取的项目,本研究为未来的考虑提供了领域,因为信息传递方面的技术创新不断发展。

资金

NIHR 帝国患者安全转化研究中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1290/10320235/17dd7a8de844/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1290/10320235/6f4da08480f8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1290/10320235/17dd7a8de844/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1290/10320235/6f4da08480f8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1290/10320235/17dd7a8de844/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the national implementation of SMS and mobile messaging in population screening (The SIPS study).调查全国范围内短信和移动消息在人群筛查中的实施情况(SIPS 研究)。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Jul;93:104685. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104685. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
Investigating the Implementation of SMS and Mobile Messaging in Population Screening (the SIPS Study): Protocol for a Delphi Study.调查短信和移动消息在人群筛查中的应用(SIPS研究):德尔菲研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 22;10(12):e32660. doi: 10.2196/32660.
3
Preferences for Text Messaging Supports During Youth Transition to Adult Mental Health Services: Theory-Informed Modified e-Delphi Study.青少年向成人心理健康服务过渡期间对短信支持的偏好:基于理论的改良电子德尔菲研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 27;8:e51690. doi: 10.2196/51690.
4
Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments.用于提醒出席医疗预约的手机短信
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 5;2013(12):CD007458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007458.pub3.
5
Scoping review and evaluation of SMS/text messaging platforms for mHealth projects or clinical interventions.针对移动健康项目或临床干预的短信/文本消息平台的范围审查与评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.01.017. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
6
Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations.用于传达医学检查结果的手机短信。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD007456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007456.pub2.
7
Developing a Consensus for Adolescent and Young Adult mHealth HIV Prevention Interventions in the United States: A Delphi Method Study.在美国制定青少年和青年移动健康HIV预防干预措施的共识:一项德尔菲法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 12;6(7):e25982. doi: 10.2196/25982.
8
Use of mobile phone text message reminders in health care services: a narrative literature review.手机短信提醒在医疗保健服务中的应用:一项叙述性文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 17;16(10):e222. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3442.
9
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.医疗干预措施系统评价概述报告规范:PRIOR 声明的制定。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 9;378:e070849. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070849.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Text Messaging Versus Postal Reminders to Improve Participation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Randomized Controlled Trial.短信与邮政提醒对提高结直肠癌筛查项目参与率的效果比较:随机对照试验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jan 1;13:e64243. doi: 10.2196/64243.
2
Oral self-management of palbociclib using mobile technology: Findings from a nurse-led randomized controlled trial.使用移动技术进行哌柏西利的口服自我管理:一项由护士主导的随机对照试验的结果
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct 15;11(12):100604. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100604. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The use of text messages as an alternative invitation method for breast cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial (M-TICS study).

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Perspectives on a Targeted Text Messaging Campaign to Encourage Screening for Diabetes: Qualitative Study.患者对鼓励糖尿病筛查的定向短信活动的看法:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 17;7:e41011. doi: 10.2196/41011.
2
Do age-targeted messages increase cervical screening intentions in women aged 50-64 years with weak positive intentions? A randomised control trial in Great Britain.年龄针对性信息是否会增加 50-64 岁有微弱积极意向的女性进行子宫颈筛查的意向?一项在英国开展的随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107322. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107322. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery.
短信作为乳腺癌筛查替代邀请方式的应用:一项随机对照试验(M-TICS 研究)。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0306720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306720. eCollection 2024.
数字外科学德尔菲共识声明。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jul 19;5(1):100. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00641-6.
4
Developing a culturally tailored short message service (SMS) intervention for improving the uptake of cervical cancer screening among Ghanaian women in urban communities.为提高加纳城市社区妇女对宫颈癌筛查的接受率,开发一种具有文化针对性的短信息服务(SMS)干预措施。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 10;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01719-9.
5
Investigating the Implementation of SMS and Mobile Messaging in Population Screening (the SIPS Study): Protocol for a Delphi Study.调查短信和移动消息在人群筛查中的应用(SIPS研究):德尔菲研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 22;10(12):e32660. doi: 10.2196/32660.
6
What influences people's responses to public health messages for managing risks and preventing infectious diseases? A rapid systematic review of the evidence and recommendations.哪些因素影响人们对管理风险和预防传染病的公共卫生信息的反应?对证据和建议的快速系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e048750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048750.
7
A systematic review of interventions to improve breast cancer screening health behaviours.系统评价改善乳腺癌筛查健康行为的干预措施。
Prev Med. 2021 Dec;153:106828. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106828. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
Investigating the Ethical and Data Governance Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Protocol for a Delphi Study.探讨外科手术中人工智能的伦理与数据治理问题:德尔菲研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Feb 22;10(2):e26552. doi: 10.2196/26552.
9
The Impact of Mobile Health on Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.移动健康对癌症筛查的影响:一项系统综述。
Cancer Inform. 2020 Oct 13;19:1176935120954191. doi: 10.1177/1176935120954191. eCollection 2020.
10
Examining Older Adults' Attitudes and Perceptions of Cancer Screening and Overscreening: A Qualitative Study.探讨老年人对癌症筛查和过度筛查的态度和看法:一项定性研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720959234. doi: 10.1177/2150132720959234.