Suppr超能文献

既往接受保乳手术和放疗患者的乳房植入物重建与自体乳房重建的手术效果

Surgical Outcomes of Implant versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Previous Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy.

作者信息

Asaad Malke, Mitchell David, Murphy Brittany, Liu Jun, Selber Jesse C, Clemens Mark W, Bedrosian Isabelle, Butler Charles E

机构信息

From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

McGovern Medical School.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Feb 1;151(2):190e-199e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009826. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in patients with a history of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy is challenging, with a paucity of literature on the outcomes of different breast reconstructive techniques. The authors hypothesized that implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) would be associated with higher complication rates compared to either IBR combined with latissimus dorsi (LD) or free flap breast reconstruction (FFBR).

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomy with a history of BCS and radiotherapy between January of 2000 and March of 2016. Surgical and patient-reported outcomes (BREAST-Q) were compared between IBR versus IBR/LD versus FFBR.

RESULTS

The authors identified 9473 patients who underwent BCS and radiotherapy. Ninety-nine patients (105 reconstructions) met the authors' inclusion criteria, 29% ( n = 30) of whom underwent IBR, 26% ( n = 27) of whom underwent IBR/LD, and 46% ( n = 48) of whom underwent FFBR. The overall complication rate was not significantly different between the three groups (50% in IBR versus 41% in IBR/LD versus 44% in FFBR; P = 0.77), whereas reconstruction failures were significantly lower in the FFBR group (33% in IBR versus 19% in IBR/LD versus 0% in FFBR; P < 0.0001). The time between the receipt of radiotherapy and reconstruction was not a significant predictor of overall complications and reconstruction failure. No significant differences were identified between the three study cohorts in any of the three studied BREAST-Q domains.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with prior BCS and radiotherapy, FFBR was associated with lower probability of reconstruction failure compared to IBR but no significant difference in overall and major complication rates. The addition of LD flap to IBR did not translate into lower complication rates but may result in decreased reconstruction failures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

摘要

背景

有保乳手术(BCS)和放疗史的患者进行乳房切除术后乳房重建具有挑战性,关于不同乳房重建技术效果的文献较少。作者推测,与植入物乳房重建(IBR)联合背阔肌(LD)或游离皮瓣乳房重建(FFBR)相比,单纯IBR的并发症发生率更高。

方法

作者对2000年1月至2016年3月间有BCS和放疗史且接受乳房切除术的患者进行了回顾性研究。比较了IBR与IBR/LD与FFBR之间的手术和患者报告结局(BREAST-Q)。

结果

作者确定了9473例接受BCS和放疗的患者。99例患者(105次重建)符合作者的纳入标准,其中29%(n = 30)接受了IBR,26%(n = 27)接受了IBR/LD,46%(n = 48)接受了FFBR。三组的总体并发症发生率无显著差异(IBR组为50%,IBR/LD组为41%,FFBR组为44%;P = 0.77),而FFBR组的重建失败率显著更低(IBR组为33%,IBR/LD组为19%,FFBR组为0%;P < 0.0001)。放疗与重建之间的时间不是总体并发症和重建失败的显著预测因素。在三个研究队列中,在三个研究的BREAST-Q领域中的任何一个领域均未发现显著差异。

结论

在既往有BCS和放疗史的患者中,与IBR相比,FFBR的重建失败概率更低,但总体和主要并发症发生率无显著差异。在IBR中添加LD皮瓣并没有降低并发症发生率,但可能会减少重建失败。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,III级

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验