• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项尸体研究中对单纯皮肤提升、SMAS 折叠和扩展 SMAS 面部提升技术的有效提升量进行量化。

Quantifying the Effective Lift of Skin-Only, SMAS Plication, and Extended SMAS Face-Lift Techniques in a Cadaveric Study.

作者信息

Rao Vinay, Basta Marten N, Jehle Charles C, Crozier Joseph W, Woo Albert S

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Feb 1;151(2):223e-233e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009834. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009834
PMID:36332084
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rhytidectomies are performed to rejuvenate the aging face. Various techniques exist to achieve soft-tissue elevation and skin tightening. This study analyzes three common face-lift techniques: skin-only, superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, and extended SMAS lifts. The authors characterize effective facial changes with each procedure in a cadaver model.

METHODS

The authors performed face-lift procedures on 18 cadaver hemifaces. Each face was measured along horizontal and vertical vectors. The primary outcome was change along these vectors. Skin-only, SMAS plication, and extended SMAS lifts were performed sequentially on each hemiface. SMAS plication was used to approximate a lateral SMASectomy procedure. Parameter measurements were compared.

RESULTS

All three procedures exhibited a significant tightening along horizontal vectors. SMAS procedures provided a significant lift along all vertical vectors, whereas the skin-only lift failed to demonstrate significant vertical elevation. SMAS procedures achieved significantly greater composite horizontal and vertical lifts compared to the skin-only operation. There was only an incremental increase in lift between the SMAS plication and extended SMAS procedures in the upper and midface regions. The extended SMAS led to the greatest lift in the lower face.

CONCLUSIONS

SMAS procedures provided a greater lift along both horizontal and vertical vectors than the skin lift alone. The increased dissection in the extended SMAS technique resulted in only a modest increase in lift compared to SMAS plication. The extended SMAS approach appears to offer the most benefit at the lower face and may be the best choice for targeting this region.

摘要

背景

除皱手术旨在使衰老的面部恢复青春活力。存在多种实现软组织提升和皮肤紧致的技术。本研究分析了三种常见的面部提升技术:单纯皮肤提升、表浅肌肉腱膜系统(SMAS)折叠术和扩展SMAS提升术。作者在尸体模型中描述了每种手术所产生的有效面部变化。

方法

作者对18个尸体半脸进行了面部提升手术。每个面部均沿水平和垂直方向进行测量。主要结果是沿这些方向的变化。在每个半脸上依次进行单纯皮肤提升、SMAS折叠术和扩展SMAS提升术。使用SMAS折叠术来模拟外侧SMAS切除术。对参数测量结果进行比较。

结果

所有三种手术在水平方向上均表现出显著的紧致效果。SMAS手术在所有垂直方向上均提供了显著的提升,而单纯皮肤提升术未能显示出显著的垂直提升效果。与单纯皮肤手术相比,SMAS手术在水平和垂直方向上实现了显著更大的综合提升。在中上面部区域,SMAS折叠术和扩展SMAS手术之间的提升仅略有增加。扩展SMAS在下面部产生了最大的提升。

结论

与单纯皮肤提升相比,SMAS手术在水平和垂直方向上均提供了更大的提升。与SMAS折叠术相比,扩展SMAS技术中增加的解剖操作仅导致提升略有增加。扩展SMAS方法似乎在下面部提供了最大的益处,可能是针对该区域的最佳选择。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the Effective Lift of Skin-Only, SMAS Plication, and Extended SMAS Face-Lift Techniques in a Cadaveric Study.在一项尸体研究中对单纯皮肤提升、SMAS 折叠和扩展 SMAS 面部提升技术的有效提升量进行量化。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Feb 1;151(2):223e-233e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009834. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study.深层平面面部提升术与表浅肌肉腱膜系统折叠面部提升术的比较研究
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):8-13. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.6.1.8.
3
A Comparison Between Two Methods of Face-Lift Surgery in Nine Cadavers: SMAS (Superficial Musculo-Aponeurotic System) Versus MACS (Minimal Access Cranial Suspension).九具尸体的两种面部提升手术方法比较:SMAS(表浅肌肉腱膜系统)与MACS(微创颅骨悬吊术)
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;39(5):680-5. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0543-3. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
4
An Approach to Selection of Face-Lift Techniques for Different Types of Faces: An Analysis of 1000 Asian Patients Over 9 Years.针对不同脸型选择面部提升技术的方法:对9年间1000例亚洲患者的分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Aug 1;93(2):153-162. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003982. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
5
Facelift Techniques: An Overview.面部提升技术:概述。
Facial Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;38(6):540-545. doi: 10.1055/a-1877-9371. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
6
Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies.有区别吗?一项前瞻性研究比较外侧和标准SMAS面部提升术与扩大SMAS和复合除皱术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Dec;98(7):1135-43; discussion 1144-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199612000-00001.
7
Periauricular Purse-String Reinforced with SMAS plication and Malaria Fat Pad Elevation for Mid-and Lower Facial Rejuvenation: FACE-Q Report.耳周荷包缝合联合SMAS折叠及颧脂肪垫提升用于中下面部年轻化:FACE-Q报告
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;81(6S Suppl 1):S59-S65. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001496.
8
Analysis of the Outcome of Reoperative Face Lifts Using Sub-SMAS Techniques.采用 SMAS 下蒂技术的再次面部提升手术效果分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jul 1;150(1):47-56. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009199. Epub 2022 May 6.
9
Face lift with U threads.U 线程面部提升术。
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2021 Feb;66(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
10
Deep Plane Facelift: An Evaluation of the High-SMAS versus Standard Incision Points.
Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;34(6):646-650. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675634. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of free SMAS fold flap and ADM in facial depression after parotidectomy.腮腺切除后面部凹陷中游离 SMAS 瓣与 ADM 的对比分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02670-2.
2
Parotid Gland Suspension Combined with Rhytidectomy to Recontour the Lower Face and Neck Enlargement Caused by Benign Parotid Hypertrophy.腮腺悬吊联合除皱术治疗良性腮腺肥大所致下脸和颈部增粗的轮廓重塑
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Mar;49(5):1167-1175. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04230-8. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the High-SMAS Facelift Technique: Objective Clinical Outcomes at 1-year.
评估高位SMAS除皱术的有效性:1年时的客观临床结果
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Dec;48(24):5257-5265. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04234-4. Epub 2024 Jul 17.