Shimada Kenji, Miyake Kazuhisa, Yamaguchi Izumi, Sogabe Shu, Korai Masaaki, Kanematsu Yasuhisa, Takagi Yasushi
Department of Neurosurgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan.
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jan;169:e260-e269. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.121. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
An understanding of the complex morphology of an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is important for successful resection. We have previously reported the utility of intra-arterial indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiography for this purpose, but that method cannot detect the angioarchitecture covered by brain tissue. 3-dimensional (3D) multimodal fusion imaging is reportedly useful for this same purpose, but cannot always visualize the exact angioarchitecture due to poor source images and processing techniques. This study examined the results of utilizing both techniques in patients with AVMs.
Both techniques were applied in 12 patients with AVMs. Both images were compared with surgical views and evaluated by surgeons.
Although evaluations for identifying superficial feeders by ICG videoangiography were high in all cases, the more complicated the AVM, the lower the evaluation by 3D multimodal fusion imaging. Conversely, evaluation of the estimated range of the nidus was high in all cases by 3D multimodal fusion imaging, but low in all but one case by ICG videoangiography. Nidus flow reduction was recognized by Flow 800 analysis obtained after ICG videoangiography.
These results showed that utilizing both techniques together was more useful than each modality alone in AVM surgery. This was particularly effective in identifying superficial feeders and estimating the range of the nidus. This technique is expected to offer an optimal tool for AVM surgery.
了解动静脉畸形(AVM)的复杂形态对于成功切除至关重要。我们之前报道了动脉内吲哚菁绿(ICG)血管造影术在此方面的效用,但该方法无法检测被脑组织覆盖的血管结构。据报道,三维(3D)多模态融合成像也可用于此目的,但由于源图像和处理技术不佳,并不总能清晰显示确切的血管结构。本研究探讨了在AVM患者中同时使用这两种技术的结果。
对12例AVM患者同时应用这两种技术。将两种图像与手术视野进行比较,并由外科医生进行评估。
虽然ICG血管造影术在识别所有病例中的浅表供血动脉方面的评估结果都很高,但AVM越复杂,3D多模态融合成像的评估结果越低。相反,3D多模态融合成像对所有病例中畸形团估计范围的评估结果都很高,但ICG血管造影术除1例之外的所有病例评估结果都很低。ICG血管造影术后通过Flow 800分析可识别畸形团血流减少情况。
这些结果表明,在AVM手术中,同时使用这两种技术比单独使用每种方法更有用。这在识别浅表供血动脉和估计畸形团范围方面尤其有效。该技术有望为AVM手术提供一种最佳工具。