Suppr超能文献

持续气道正压通气疗法与其他阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停治疗方法的成本效益比较。

Cost-Effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Versus Other Treatments of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA.

出版信息

Sleep Med Clin. 2022 Dec;17(4):559-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Oct 9.

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder that is increasing in prevalence, both in the United States and worldwide. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the gold-standard treatment for OSA, is cost-effective from both a payer and societal perspective. Alternative treatments of OSA, including oral appliance therapy, various surgeries, and hypoglossal nerve stimulation have also been evaluated from a cost-effectiveness perspective although results are less consistent. Some studies directly compare these alternative therapies with CPAP. This review will discuss the available literature for cost-effectiveness analysis in the treatment of OSA.

摘要

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种常见疾病,无论是在美国还是在全球,其发病率都在不断上升。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是 OSA 的金标准治疗方法,从支付者和社会角度来看,具有成本效益。OSA 的替代治疗方法,包括口腔矫治器治疗、各种手术和舌下神经刺激,也从成本效益的角度进行了评估,尽管结果不太一致。一些研究直接比较了这些替代疗法与 CPAP。本综述将讨论治疗 OSA 的成本效益分析的现有文献。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验