• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国最高法院裁决与妇女生殖权利——欧洲妇产科委员会(EBCOG)发表的立场声明

The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Dec;279:130-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.012. Epub 2022 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.012
PMID:36334375
Abstract

The judicial review by the Supreme Court of the United States on Roe v. Wade has fundamentally limited the ability of women to exercise choice and control of their sexual and reproductive rights in the United States. The global organisations are concerned that there remains a risk that women's rights will be diminished globally in future.

摘要

美国最高法院对罗诉韦德案的司法审查从根本上限制了美国女性行使选择和控制其性和生殖权利的能力。全球组织担心未来全球妇女的权利仍有可能受到减损。

相似文献

1
The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).美国最高法院裁决与妇女生殖权利——欧洲妇产科委员会(EBCOG)发表的立场声明
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Dec;279:130-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.012. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
2
Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade.美国最高法院对德克萨斯州堕胎法的裁决:罗诉韦德案开始瓦解。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 15;327(7):621-622. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0050.
3
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
4
and the New Jane Crow: Reproductive Rights in the Age of Mass Incarceration.以及《新简·克劳:大规模监禁时代的生殖权利》
Am J Public Health. 2022 Sep;112(9):1313-1317. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301104r.
5
(Re)criminalizing Abortion: Returning to the Political with Stories.(Re)刑事化堕胎:用故事回归政治。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(3):480-484. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.132. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case.美国司法部在韦伯斯特案中的论点所涉及的国际层面。
Law Med Health Care. 1989 Winter;17(4):384-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01120.x.
7
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.
8
The fall of Roe Wade: the fight for abortion rights is universal.罗诉韦德案的败诉:堕胎权之争是全球性的。
BMJ. 2022 Jun 29;377:o1608. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1608.
9
Reproductive rights activism in the post-Roe era.后罗诉韦德时代的生殖权利行动主义。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):10-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301125. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.美国的堕胎与法律程序:韦伯斯特案后法律格局概述
Law Med Health Care. 1989 Winter;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01118.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstacles to Exercising Reproductive Rights for Single Women in China and Legal Recommendations.中国单身女性行使生育权的障碍及法律建议
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Oct 16;16:2125-2138. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S422754. eCollection 2023.