John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Mar;38(2):416-429. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3592. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
The conect4children (c4c) consortium was setup to facilitate the development of new drugs and therapies for paediatric populations and address key challenges associated with paediatric clinical trials. Two of the major adopting principles for c4c were academia-industry partnership and data harmonisation and interoperability through common eCRF definitions. To understand the challenges arising out of these principles, the c4c team at Newcastle University conducted semi-structured interviews with four c4c industry partners.
Each partner was asked 10 questions about the data standards used in their company, management and maintenance of data dictionaries, how they dealt with paediatric-specific issues, major knowledge gaps and how academia could aid in bridging these gaps. Thematic analysis was performed to identify patterns in their answers.
All companies use the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) standards but face problems when certain terminology is not included in CDISC (e.g., paediatric-specific terminologies). All companies were committed to interoperability and had strict policies about how additional terminology could be added to their dictionaries. Three of the four companies maintained a single dictionary but also had lighter versions for specific usage. The two major knowledge gaps identified from the interviews were handling of non-CDISC terminology and maintenance of normal lab ranges in dictionaries.
To address these gaps, c4c has been working on a four-point plan including the development of a cross-cutting paediatric dictionary and a paediatric user guide in collaboration with CDISC.
conect4children(c4c)联盟成立的目的是为了促进儿科人群的新药和疗法的开发,并解决与儿科临床试验相关的关键挑战。c4c 的两个主要采用原则是学术界-工业界伙伴关系以及通过通用电子病例报告表(eCRF)定义实现的数据协调和互操作性。为了了解这些原则所带来的挑战,纽卡斯尔大学的 c4c 团队对四位 c4c 行业合作伙伴进行了半结构化访谈。
每个合作伙伴都被问到了 10 个关于他们公司使用的数据标准、数据字典的管理和维护、如何处理儿科特有问题、主要知识差距以及学术界如何帮助弥合这些差距的问题。采用主题分析来识别他们回答中的模式。
所有公司都使用临床数据交换标准协会(CDISC)标准,但在某些术语未包含在 CDISC 中时会遇到问题(例如,儿科特有术语)。所有公司都致力于互操作性,并制定了严格的政策,规定如何向其字典添加额外的术语。四家公司中有三家维护了一个单一的字典,但也有针对特定用途的简化版本。从访谈中确定的两个主要知识差距是处理非 CDISC 术语和在字典中维护正常实验室范围。
为了解决这些差距,c4c 一直在制定四点计划,包括与 CDISC 合作开发跨领域儿科字典和儿科用户指南。