Ju Wenqiang, Dong Jun, Chang Chenxu
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University Nanjing Jiangsu 211816 China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban and Industrial Safety, Nanjing Tech University Nanjing Jiangsu 211816 China.
RSC Adv. 2022 Oct 24;12(47):30227-30235. doi: 10.1039/d2ra05811a.
A traditional view is that gas in the intact coal is easier to be extracted compared with tectonic coal after stress relief. With the increase in buried depth, however, the structure of coal and the permeability evolution law may change. Thus, the variation of permeability characteristics and the efficiency of gas extraction method at a deeper coal seam need further study. In this paper, the intact coal and tectonic coal in the Qinan coal mine are taken as the research objects. The permeabilities of both coal samples were tested under hydrostatic pressure, and the effective stress was loaded to a high level and then unloaded to the initial value. The differences of fracture structure between the intact coal and tectonic coal were also analyzed. The results show that, after loading and unloading, the permeability recovery rate of the intact coal is lower than that of the tectonic coal, and the fracture loss degree is higher than that of the tectonic coal. The reason is that the contact area between the matrixes of intact coal is relatively small, and the high stress leads to the plastic deformation or fracture of the matrix rock bridge. The contact area between the matrixes of tectonic coal is much larger and has a stronger resistance to compression deformation. The fracture structure of intact coal makes it more difficult to extract gas under high stress conditions. It is necessary to combine various stress relief methods such as protective layer mining and hydraulic punching to expand the fracture aperture, and enhance the permeability and the gas extraction efficiency.
传统观点认为,在卸压后,原生结构煤中的瓦斯比构造煤中的瓦斯更容易被抽采。然而,随着埋藏深度的增加,煤的结构及渗透率演化规律可能会发生变化。因此,深部煤层渗透率特性的变化及瓦斯抽采方法的有效性有待进一步研究。本文以祁南煤矿的原生结构煤和构造煤为研究对象,对两种煤样在静水压力下的渗透率进行了测试,并将有效应力加载到较高水平后再卸载至初始值,同时分析了原生结构煤与构造煤裂隙结构的差异。结果表明,加载卸载后,原生结构煤的渗透率恢复率低于构造煤,裂隙损失程度高于构造煤。原因是原生结构煤基质间的接触面积相对较小,高应力导致基质岩桥发生塑性变形或破裂;构造煤基质间的接触面积大得多,抗压变形能力更强。原生结构煤的裂隙结构使其在高应力条件下瓦斯抽采更为困难,需要结合保护层开采、水力冲孔等多种卸压方法来扩大裂隙孔径,提高渗透率及瓦斯抽采效率。