Suppr超能文献

基于 RNA-seq 的子宫内膜容受性检测 (rsERT) 与种植窗检测相比:中国人群复发性种植失败患者子宫内膜容受性的更好诊断工具。

The RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) compared to pinopode: A better diagnostic tool for endometrial receptivity for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Chinese population.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Clinical Research Center for Women's Reproductive Health in Hunan Province, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 21;13:1009161. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1009161. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Displaced window of implantation (WOI) is one of the endometrial origins that accounts for implantation failure, especially for patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF), yet no standard diagnostic tool has been recognized. The study consists of two parts, aiming to compare the concordance and efficacy of the diagnostic tools, the newly developed RNA-seq based endometrial receptivity test (rsERT) to the conventional pinopode, in diagnosing WOI and guiding personalized embryo transfer (pET). With the same group of RIF patients, the rsERT diagnosed 32 patients (65.31%) with normal WOIs, and most of the displacements were advancements (30.61%). While according to pinopode, only 14 patients (28.57%) were found with normal WOIs, and most patients (63.27%) presented delayed growth patterns. After conducting pET, patients in the rsERT group had higher successful pregnancy rates while requiring fewer ET cycles (50.00% vs. 16.67%, p=0.001). The study proved poor consistency between the diagnostic tools of endometrial receptivity based on cellular structure and gene profiling, and it supported rsERT as a reliable tool with potential clinical value.

摘要

着床窗移位(WOI)是子宫内膜着床失败的原因之一,尤其是在反复着床失败(RIF)的患者中,但目前还没有公认的标准诊断工具。该研究由两部分组成,旨在比较新开发的基于 RNA 测序的子宫内膜容受性测试(rsERT)与传统的点状突起在诊断 WOI 和指导个性化胚胎移植(pET)方面的一致性和效果。对同一组 RIF 患者,rsERT 诊断出 32 名(65.31%)患者 WOI 正常,大部分为提前(30.61%)。而根据点状突起,只有 14 名(28.57%)患者 WOI 正常,大部分患者(63.27%)呈延迟生长模式。进行 pET 后,rsERT 组患者的妊娠成功率更高,所需的 ET 周期数更少(50.00% vs. 16.67%,p=0.001)。该研究表明,基于细胞结构和基因谱的子宫内膜容受性诊断工具之间一致性较差,并支持 rsERT 作为一种具有潜在临床价值的可靠工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce92/9634259/76496a9a6958/fendo-13-1009161-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验