Li Jing, Hui Xu, Fu Jiani, Ahmed Muhammad Muneeb, Yao Liang, Yang Kehu
Health Technology Assessment Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Oct 20;20:90. doi: 10.18332/tid/154075. eCollection 2022.
Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been frequently used for smoking cessation. The aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library from inception to 10 October 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Paired authors extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and used GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to rate the certainty of evidence.
The study included five RCTs with 1748 participants. The meta-analysis suggested the e-cigarettes versus NRT increased the ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.21-2.28; 55 more per 1000 participants, low certainty), and 7-day point abstinence rate at ≥6 months follow-up (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.19-1.72; 84 more per 1000, low certainty). However, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes versus NRT increased 3-6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.07; 95% CI: 0.73-1.57; 10 more per 1000, very low certainty) and <3 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.20; 95% CI: 0.90-1.60; 54 more per 1000, low certainty); similar results were found at <3 months follow-up (RR=1.19; 95% CI: 0.92-1.54; 55 more per 1000, very low certainty) and 3-6 months follow-up in 7-day point abstinence rate (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.70-1.44; 2 more per 1000, very low certainty). The adverse events were not significant between e-cigarettes and NRT other than throat irritation (RR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.13-1.42; 118 more per 1000, low certainty).
E-cigarettes appeared to be superior to NRT in ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate. At short-term duration, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes compared to NRT increased the <6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate.
尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)和电子烟已被频繁用于戒烟。本综述的目的是研究电子烟与NRT相比在戒烟方面的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了从创刊至2021年10月10日的PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。我们纳入了比较电子烟与NRT戒烟效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文以确定是否符合纳入标准。配对作者提取数据、评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)对证据的确定性进行评级。
该研究包括五项RCT,共1748名参与者。荟萃分析表明,与NRT相比,电子烟提高了≥6个月持续戒烟率(RR=1.67;95%CI:1.21-2.28;每1000名参与者多55人,低确定性),以及在≥6个月随访时的7天点戒烟率(RR=1.43;95%CI:1.19-1.72;每1000名多84人,低确定性)。然而,我们没有发现证据表明与NRT相比,电子烟提高了3-6个月持续戒烟率(RR=1.07;95%CI:0.73-1.57;每1000名多10人,极低确定性)和<3个月持续戒烟率(RR=1.20;95%CI:0.90-1.60;每1000名多54人,低确定性);在<3个月随访时(RR=1.19;95%CI:0.92-1.54;每1000名多55人,极低确定性)以及3-6个月随访时的7天点戒烟率方面(RR=1.01;95%CI:0.70-1.44;每1000名多2人,极低确定性)也得到了类似结果。除喉咙刺激外,电子烟和NRT之间的不良事件无显著差异(RR=1.27;95%CI:1.13-1.42;每1000名多118人,低确定性)。
电子烟在≥6个月持续戒烟率和7天点戒烟率方面似乎优于NRT。在短期内,我们没有发现证据表明与NRT相比,电子烟提高了<6个月持续戒烟率和7天点戒烟率。