Division of Clinical Virology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Viennagrid.22937.3d, Vienna, Austria.
IhrLabor, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Vienna, Austria.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0215722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02157-22. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
The NeuMoDx96 platform is a fully automated real-time PCR (RT-PCR) system. To provide continued testing quality with the introduction of new assays, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the NeuMoDx platform for the detection and quantification of CMV and EBV DNA in EDTA plasma. As no conversion from log international units per milliliter to copies per milliliter was provided, the secondary aim was to calculate and establish a conversion factor for the output of results in copies per milliliter for CMV and EBV. Archived ETDA plasma samples (cytomegalovirus [CMV], = 290; Ebstein-Barr virus [EBV], = 254) were used to evaluate the analytical performance of the NeuMoDx96 platform against the routine real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays. Additionally, the first WHO international standards (WHO-IS) for CMV ( = 70) and EBV ( = 72) were used for the calculation of the intra- and interassay variation. WHO-IS qualitative agreement between the assays was 100%. Intra-assay variability was low for both CMV assays (coefficient of variation [CV], phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], 3 log IU/mL NeuMoDx, 3.67%; Abbott RealTime, CMV, 3.35%) and NeuMoDx EBV assay (CV, PBS, 3 log IU/mL, 3.05%) but high for the Altona EBV assay (CV, PBS, 3 log IU/mL, 26.13%). The overall qualitative concordance in clinical samples was 96.8% (270/279) for CMV and 96.7% (237/245) for EBV. The mean difference between the assays was -0.2 log IU/mL (CMV) and -0.18 log IU/mL (EBV). High qualitative concordance and a significant correlation of quantitative values for both assays make NeuMoDx CMV and EBV assays suitable for routine diagnostic testing. The new RT-PCR system and conversion formulas to report results in copies per milliliter are now applied in clinical routine testing. Clinical management of solid organ transplant (SOT) patients requires the careful monitoring of immunosuppression and viral infection or reactivation. qPCR is the gold standard for the detection and quantification of very small amounts of viral DNA and allows for an early assessment of viral load kinetics. The tested NeuMoDx 96 platform provides faster results than the previously used RT-PCR workflows for CMV (Abbott m2000 and RealTime CMV assay) and EBV (LightCycler 480 II, Roche high pure extraction, and Altona RealStar EBV assay) DNA detection. The implemented conversion formulas allow the continued reporting in clinically established copies per milliliter, important for long-term care of SOT patients.
NeuMoDx96 平台是一种全自动实时聚合酶链反应 (RT-PCR) 系统。为了在引入新检测方法的同时保持持续的检测质量,本研究的主要目的是评估 NeuMoDx 平台用于检测和定量 EDTA 血浆中 CMV 和 EBV DNA 的分析和临床性能。由于没有提供从国际单位/毫升到拷贝/毫升的转换,因此次要目的是计算并建立 CMV 和 EBV 结果以拷贝/毫升报告的转换因子。使用存档的 EDTA 血浆样本(巨细胞病毒 [CMV], = 290;EB 病毒 [EBV], = 254)来评估 NeuMoDx96 平台对常规实时定量 PCR (qPCR) 检测方法的分析性能。此外,还使用了世界卫生组织(WHO)的第一个国际标准品(WHO-IS)来计算内和间分析变异性。两种检测方法的 WHO-IS 定性一致性为 100%。CMV 检测的内分析变异性较低(CV,磷酸盐缓冲盐水 [PBS],NeuMoDx 3 log IU/mL,3.67%;Abbott RealTime,CMV,3.35%),NeuMoDx EBV 检测的内分析变异性也较低(CV,PBS,3 log IU/mL,3.05%),但 Altona EBV 检测的内分析变异性较高(CV,PBS,3 log IU/mL,26.13%)。CMV 临床样本的总定性一致性为 96.8%(270/279),EBV 为 96.7%(237/245)。两种检测方法之间的平均差异为-0.2 log IU/mL(CMV)和-0.18 log IU/mL(EBV)。高定性一致性和定量值的显著相关性使 NeuMoDx CMV 和 EBV 检测方法适用于常规诊断检测。新的 RT-PCR 系统和以拷贝/毫升报告结果的转换公式现已应用于临床常规检测。
实体器官移植 (SOT) 患者的临床管理需要仔细监测免疫抑制和病毒感染或再激活。qPCR 是检测和定量极少量病毒 DNA 的金标准,可早期评估病毒载量动力学。经过测试的 NeuMoDx 96 平台在 CMV(Abbott m2000 和 RealTime CMV 检测)和 EBV(LightCycler 480 II,罗氏高纯度提取和 Altona RealStar EBV 检测)DNA 检测方面提供了比以前使用的 RT-PCR 工作流程更快的结果。实施的转换公式允许以临床建立的拷贝/毫升继续报告,这对于 SOT 患者的长期护理很重要。