文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法治疗复发或难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤成人患者的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2023 Mar 14;7(5):801-810. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008097.


DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008097
PMID:36342852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10011202/
Abstract

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is traditionally considered treatable but incurable. In March 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) FL after ≥2 lines of therapy. Priced at $373 000, CAR T-cell therapy is potentially curative, and its cost-effectiveness compared with other modern R/R FL treatment strategies is unknown. We developed a Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of third-line CAR T-cell vs standard of care (SOC) therapies in adults with R/R FL. We estimated progression rates for patients receiving CAR T-cell and SOC therapies from the ZUMA-5 trial and the LEO CReWE study, respectively. We calculated costs, discounted life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAR T-cell vs SOC therapies with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per QALY. Our analysis was conducted from a US payer's perspective over a lifetime horizon. In our base-case model, the cost of the CAR T-cell strategy was $731 682 compared with $458 490 for SOC therapies. However, CAR T-cell therapy was associated with incremental clinical benefit of 1.50 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of $182 127 per QALY. Our model was most sensitive to the utilities associated with CAR T-cell therapy remission and third-line SOC therapies and to the total upfront CAR T-cell therapy cost. Under current pricing, CAR T-cell therapy is unlikely to be cost-effective in unselected patients with FL in the third-line setting. Both randomized clinical trials and longer term clinical follow-up can help clarify the benefits of CAR T-cell therapy and optimal sequencing in patients with FL.

摘要

滤泡性淋巴瘤 (FL) 传统上被认为是可治疗但不可治愈的疾病。2021 年 3 月,美国食品和药物管理局批准嵌合抗原受体 (CAR) T 细胞疗法用于至少接受过 2 线治疗后复发或难治性 (R/R) FL 患者。CAR T 细胞疗法的价格为 373000 美元,具有潜在的治愈效果,但其与其他现代 R/R FL 治疗策略相比的成本效益尚不清楚。我们开发了一个马尔可夫模型来评估三线 CAR T 细胞与 R/R FL 成人标准护理 (SOC) 治疗相比的成本效益。我们分别从 ZUMA-5 试验和 LEO CReWE 研究中估计接受 CAR T 细胞和 SOC 治疗的患者的进展率。我们使用愿意支付每 QALY 150000 美元的阈值,计算了 CAR T 细胞与 SOC 治疗的成本、贴现生命年、质量调整生命年 (QALY) 和增量成本效益比 (ICER)。我们的分析是从美国支付者的角度在终身时间范围内进行的。在我们的基本模型中,CAR T 细胞策略的成本为 731682 美元,而 SOC 疗法的成本为 458490 美元。然而,CAR T 细胞治疗与额外的 1.50 QALY 临床获益相关,导致每 QALY 的 ICER 为 182127 美元。我们的模型对与 CAR T 细胞治疗缓解和三线 SOC 治疗相关的效用以及 CAR T 细胞治疗的总前期成本最为敏感。根据目前的定价,在三线环境中,CAR T 细胞疗法不太可能对未经选择的 FL 患者具有成本效益。随机临床试验和更长时间的临床随访可以帮助阐明 CAR T 细胞疗法对 FL 患者的益处和最佳治疗顺序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/19bcf52f5834/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/7d3fb211a26b/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/8aa938e19021/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/f863335a36fa/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/19bcf52f5834/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/7d3fb211a26b/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/8aa938e19021/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/f863335a36fa/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342d/10011202/19bcf52f5834/BLOODA_ADV-2022-008097-gr3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in adults with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.

Blood Adv. 2023-3-14

[2]
Cost-Effectiveness of KTE-X19 for Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the United States.

Adv Ther. 2022-8

[3]
Cost-effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Tisagenlecleucel as Second-line or Later Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

JAMA Netw Open. 2022-12-1

[4]
Cost-effectiveness for KTE-X19 CAR T therapy for adult patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States.

J Med Econ. 2021

[5]
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Frontline Polatuzumab-Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, and Prednisone and/or Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Versus Standard of Care for Treatment of Patients With Intermediate- to High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

J Clin Oncol. 2023-3-10

[6]
Value for Money of CAR-T Cell Therapy for Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in China: Evidence from a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023-9

[7]
Cost-effectiveness of treating relapsed or refractory 3L+ follicular lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel vs mosunetuzumab in the United States.

Front Immunol. 2024

[8]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of KTE-X19 CAR T therapy versus real-world standard of care in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma post BTKi in England.

J Med Econ. 2022

[9]
Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Adult Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States.

Value Health. 2024-8

[10]
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus lisocabtagene maraleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the US.

J Med Econ. 2022

引用本文的文献

[1]
Smart CAR-T Nanosymbionts: archetypes and proto-models.

Front Immunol. 2025-8-12

[2]
Pharmacoeconomic Profiles of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Healthcare (Basel). 2025-8-2

[3]
Can We Lower the Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in Heavily Immunocompromised Patients? A Narrative Review and Call to Action.

Infect Dis Ther. 2025-8-7

[4]
Advances in Gene Therapy with Oncolytic Viruses and CAR-T Cells and Therapy-Related Groups.

Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2025-4-10

[5]
Bio-functional hydrogel coated membranes to decrease T-cell exhaustion in manufacturing of CAR T-cells.

Front Immunol. 2025-6-27

[6]
From Bench to Bedside in Emerging Therapies for Gynecological Malignancies: A Narrative Review.

Cancer Control. 2025

[7]
A Systematic Literature Review of the Economic and Healthcare Resource Utilization Burden of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.

Pharmacoecon Open. 2025-4-22

[8]
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mosunetuzumab vs Tisagenlecleucel for Treatment of Third- or Higher-Line (3L+) Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) in Italy.

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025-4-16

[9]
CAR-T cell therapies: patient access and affordability solutions.

Future Sci OA. 2025-12

[10]
Clinical development of allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor αβ-T cells.

Mol Ther. 2025-6-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

Blood. 2022-8-25

[2]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of KTE-X19 CAR T therapy versus real-world standard of care in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma post BTKi in England.

J Med Econ. 2022

[3]
Cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel versus lisocabtagene maraleucel for adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy in the US.

J Med Econ. 2022

[4]
Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma receiving three or more lines of systemic therapy (LEO CReWE): a multicentre cohort study.

Lancet Haematol. 2022-4

[5]
Axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2022-1

[6]
Characterizing Out-of-Pocket Payments and Financial Assistance for Patients Prescribed Abiraterone and Enzalutamide at an Academic Cancer Center Specialty Pharmacy.

JCO Oncol Pract. 2022-2

[7]
Perspectives on outpatient administration of CAR-T cell therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

J Immunother Cancer. 2021-4

[8]
Cost-effectiveness for KTE-X19 CAR T therapy for adult patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United States.

J Med Econ. 2021

[9]
Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Versus Second-Line Use of Daratumumab in Older, Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

J Clin Oncol. 2021-4-1

[10]
United States Life Tables, 2018.

Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索