• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ZUMA-5(axi-cel)与 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照在复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的比较效果。

Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.

机构信息

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

出版信息

Blood. 2022 Aug 25;140(8):851-860. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014375.

DOI:10.1182/blood.2021014375
PMID:35679476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9412012/
Abstract

In the pivotal ZUMA-5 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Here, outcomes from ZUMA-5 are compared with the international SCHOLAR-5 cohort, which applied key ZUMA-5 trial eligibility criteria simulating randomized controlled trial conditions. SCHOLAR-5 data were extracted from institutions in 5 countries, and from 1 historical clinical trial, for r/r FL patients who initiated a third or higher line of therapy after July 2014. Patient characteristics were balanced through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weighting. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were compared using weighted odds ratios. The 143 ScHOLAR-5 patients reduced to an effective sample of 85 patients after SMR weighting vs 86 patients in ZUMA-5. Median follow-up time was 25.4 and 23.3 months for SCHOLAR-5 and ZUMA-5. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in SCHOLAR-5 were 59.8 months and 12.7 months and not reached in ZUMA-5. Hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.83) and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.18-0.49). The ORR and CR rate were 49.9% and 29.9% in SCHOLAR-5 and 94.2% and 79.1% in ZUMA-5, for odds ratios of 16.2 (95% CI, 5.6-46.9) and 8.9 (95% CI, 4.3-18.3). Compared with available therapies, axi-cel demonstrated an improvement in meaningful clinical endpoints, suggesting axi-cel addresses an important unmet need for r/r FL patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03105336.

摘要

在关键的 ZUMA-5 试验中,axi-cel(一种自体抗 CD19 嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法)在复发/难治性(r/r)滤泡淋巴瘤(FL)患者中显示出高比例的持久缓解率。在这里,ZUMA-5 的结果与国际 SCHOLAR-5 队列进行了比较,该队列应用了关键的 ZUMA-5 试验纳入标准,模拟了随机对照试验的条件。SCHOLAR-5 数据来自 5 个国家的机构,以及 1 项历史临床试验,涉及 2014 年 7 月后接受第 3 次或更高线治疗的 r/r FL 患者。通过使用标准化死亡率比(SMR)加权对预设预后因素进行倾向评分,平衡患者特征。使用加权 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估生存时间。使用加权优势比比较总缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解(CR)率。经过 SMR 加权后,143 名 ScHOLAR-5 患者减少到 85 名有效样本,而 ZUMA-5 中为 86 名。SCHOLAR-5 和 ZUMA-5 的中位随访时间分别为 25.4 个月和 23.3 个月。SCHOLAR-5 的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为 59.8 个月和 12.7 个月,ZUMA-5 未达到。OS 和 PFS 的风险比分别为 0.42(95%CI,0.21-0.83)和 0.30(95%CI,0.18-0.49)。SCHOLAR-5 的 ORR 和 CR 率分别为 49.9%和 29.9%,ZUMA-5 分别为 94.2%和 79.1%,优势比为 16.2(95%CI,5.6-46.9)和 8.9(95%CI,4.3-18.3)。与现有疗法相比,axi-cel 在有意义的临床终点方面显示出改善,表明 axi-cel 满足了 r/r FL 患者的重要未满足需求。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 #NCT03105336。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/9578e890659d/bloodBLD2021014375f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/f075b0435a5d/bloodBLD2021014375absf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/81fef07e9706/bloodBLD2021014375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/d8e56e083780/bloodBLD2021014375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/9578e890659d/bloodBLD2021014375f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/f075b0435a5d/bloodBLD2021014375absf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/81fef07e9706/bloodBLD2021014375f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/d8e56e083780/bloodBLD2021014375f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f13/9412012/9578e890659d/bloodBLD2021014375f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.ZUMA-5(axi-cel)与 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照在复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的比较效果。
Blood. 2022 Aug 25;140(8):851-860. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021014375.
2
A 24-month updated analysis of the comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs. SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.ZUMA-5(axi-cel)与 SCHOLAR-5 外部对照在复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的 24 个月更新疗效比较分析。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2023 Feb;23(2):199-206. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2171994. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
3
Three-year follow-up analysis of axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5).ZUMA-5 研究:复发/难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤中 axicabtagene ciloleucel 的 3 年随访分析。
Blood. 2024 Feb 8;143(6):496-506. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023021243.
4
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel to Mosunetuzumab for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.阿基仑赛注射液与莫苏奈妥珠单抗治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤的匹配调整间接比较
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Sep;30(9):885.e1-885.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.016. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
5
A Comparison of 3-Year Follow-up of ZUMA-5 (Axicabtagene Ciloleucel) With SCHOLAR-5 in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.ZUMA-5(阿基仑赛)与 SCHOLAR-5 治疗复发性/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤的 3 年随访结果比较。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 May;24(5):e191-e195.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
Real-World Evidence of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for the Treatment of Large B Cell Lymphoma in the United States.美国真实世界研究评估 Axicabtagene Ciloleucel 治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):581.e1-581.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.026. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Cost-effectiveness of treating relapsed or refractory 3L+ follicular lymphoma with axicabtagene ciloleucel vs mosunetuzumab in the United States.在美国,用 axicabtagene ciloleucel 治疗复发/难治性 3L+滤泡性淋巴瘤与 mosunetuzumab 的成本效益比较。
Front Immunol. 2024 May 24;15:1393939. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393939. eCollection 2024.
8
Standard-of-Care Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium.阿基仑赛用于复发或难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的标准治疗:来自美国淋巴瘤嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗联盟的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3119-3128. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02104. Epub 2020 May 13.
9
Survival with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Large B-Cell Lymphoma.阿基仑赛治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的总生存。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 13;389(2):148-157. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2301665. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
10
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry.基于真实世界法国登记数据的阿基仑赛与Tisagenlecleucel 治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的成本-效果分析。
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4282-4298. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02971-1. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
CAR-T cell therapy for cancer: current challenges and future directions.用于癌症治疗的嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法:当前挑战与未来方向
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025 Jul 4;10(1):210. doi: 10.1038/s41392-025-02269-w.
2
The prognostic value of POD24 in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma-A SCHOLAR-5 analysis.POD24在复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤中的预后价值——一项SCHOLAR-5分析
EJHaem. 2025 Feb 6;6(1):e1104. doi: 10.1002/jha2.1104. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Impact of immunological aging on T cell-mediated therapies in older adults with multiple myeloma and lymphoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes in patients relapsed/refractory after ≥2 prior lines of therapy for follicular lymphoma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.≥2 线治疗后复发/难治滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的临床结局:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10546-6.
2
Efficacy comparison of tisagenlecleucel vs usual care in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.tisagenlecleucel 对比常规护理治疗复发/难治性滤泡淋巴瘤患者的疗效比较。
Blood Adv. 2022 Nov 22;6(22):5835-5843. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008150.
3
Real-World Evidence of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for the Treatment of Large B Cell Lymphoma in the United States.
免疫衰老对老年多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者T细胞介导治疗的影响。
J Immunother Cancer. 2024 Dec 2;12(12):e009462. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009462.
4
Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Observational Studies of Therapeutics for COVID-19 Infection.用于COVID-19感染治疗观察性研究中混杂因素控制的倾向评分方法
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 13;79(Supplement_4):S131-S136. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae516.
5
Approved CAR-T therapies have reproducible efficacy and safety in clinical practice.已批准的嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法在临床实践中具有可重现的疗效和安全性。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2378543. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2378543. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
6
The treatment of follicular lymphoma with CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.采用靶向CD19的嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 5;14:1384600. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1384600. eCollection 2024.
7
Impact of age at ivacaftor initiation on pulmonary outcomes among people with cystic fibrosis.依伐卡托特起始治疗年龄对囊性纤维化患者肺部结局的影响。
Thorax. 2024 Sep 18;79(10):915-924. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220559.
8
Challenges and Lessons Learned in Autologous Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Development from a Statistical Perspective.从统计学角度看自体嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法研发的挑战与经验教训。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Sep;58(5):817-830. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00652-3. Epub 2024 May 4.
9
Therapeutic Vaccines for Follicular Lymphoma: A Systematic Review.滤泡性淋巴瘤的治疗性疫苗:一项系统评价
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;17(3):272. doi: 10.3390/ph17030272.
10
CAR-T Cell Therapy for Follicular Lymphomas.嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 1;16(1):e2024012. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2024.012. eCollection 2024.
美国真实世界研究评估 Axicabtagene Ciloleucel 治疗大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的疗效。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Sep;28(9):581.e1-581.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.026. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Prospects in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma beyond first-line therapy.滤泡性淋巴瘤一线治疗以外患者管理的前景。
Haematologica. 2022 Jan 1;107(1):19-34. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278717.
5
Axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (ZUMA-5): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.阿基仑赛注射液治疗复发或难治性惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(ZUMA-5):一项单臂、多中心、2 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):91-103. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00591-X. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
Validation of POD24 as a robust early clinical end point of poor survival in FL from 5225 patients on 13 clinical trials.在 13 项临床试验的 5225 名患者中验证 POD24 作为滤泡性淋巴瘤不良生存的可靠早期临床终点。
Blood. 2022 Mar 17;139(11):1684-1693. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020010263.
7
RE-MIND: Comparing Tafasitamab + Lenalidomide (L-MIND) with a Real-world Lenalidomide Monotherapy Cohort in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.RE-MIND:比较复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中塔法西他单抗+来那度胺(L-MIND)与真实世界中来那度胺单药治疗队列。
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Nov 15;27(22):6124-6134. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1471. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
8
The Future of Clinical Trial Design in Oncology.肿瘤学临床试验设计的未来。
Cancer Discov. 2021 Apr;11(4):822-837. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1301.
9
Follicular lymphoma in the modern era: survival, treatment outcomes, and identification of high-risk subgroups.现代滤泡性淋巴瘤:生存、治疗结果和高危亚组的识别。
Blood Cancer J. 2020 Jul 17;10(7):74. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00340-z.
10
Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study.塔法西单抗联合来那度胺治疗复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(L-MIND):一项多中心、前瞻性、单臂、2 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21(7):978-988. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30225-4. Epub 2020 Jun 5.