Laboratoire de Virologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Université Paris Cité, INSERM U976, Equipe INSIGHT, Paris, France.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Dec 21;10(6):e0213322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02133-22. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
The genome of the Omicron variant of concern (VOC) contains more than 50 mutations, many of which have been associated with increased transmissibility, differing disease severity, and the potential to elute immune responses acquired after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination or infection with previous VOCs. Due to a better tropism for the upper respiratory tract, it was suggested that the detection of the Omicron variant could be preferred in saliva, compared to nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS). Our objective was to compare the SARS-CoV-2 levels in saliva fluid and NPS to estimated Ct values, according to the main SARS-CoV-2 variants circulating in France since the beginning of 2021. We analyzed 1,289 positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results during the three major waves: Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. NPS and saliva sampling were performed for 909 (71%) and 380 (29%) cases, respectively. The Ct values were significantly lower in the NPS samples than in the saliva samples for the three main VOCs. Still, the difference was less pronounced with the Omicron variant than for the Alpha and Delta variants. In contrast, in the saliva samples, Ct values were significantly lower for the Omicron variant than for the Delta (difference of -2.7 Ct) and the Alpha (difference of -3.0 Ct) variants, confirming a higher viral load in saliva. To conclude, the higher viral load in saliva was evidenced for the Omicron variant, compared to the Alpha and Delta variants, suggesting that established diagnostic methods might require revalidation with the emergence of novel variants. Established methods for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics might require revalidation with the emergence of novel variants. This is important for screening strategy programs and for the investigation of the characteristics of new variants in terms of tropism modification and increased viral burden leading to its spread. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR screening on saliva samples reported lower but acceptable performance, compared to nasopharyngeal samples. Due to a better tropism for the upper respiratory tract, it was suggested that the detection of the Omicron variant could be preferred in saliva, compared to nasopharyngeal swabs. Our study analyzed 1,289 positive RT-PCR results during the three major waves in France: Alpha, Delta, and Omicron. Our findings also showed a higher viral load in saliva for the Omicron variant, compared to the Alpha and Delta variants.
关注的奥密克戎变异株(VOC)的基因组包含 50 多个突变,其中许多突变与传染性增加、疾病严重程度不同以及逃避严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种或先前 VOC 感染后获得的免疫反应的潜力有关。由于奥密克戎变异株对上呼吸道的亲和力更好,因此与鼻咽拭子(NPS)相比,有人建议在唾液中检测奥密克戎变异株。我们的目的是根据 2021 年初以来在法国流行的主要 SARS-CoV-2 变异株,比较唾液液和 NPS 中的 SARS-CoV-2 水平与估计的 Ct 值。我们分析了三个主要波期间(Alpha、Delta 和 Omicron)的 1,289 个阳性逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)结果。NPS 和唾液采样分别在 909(71%)和 380(29%)例中进行。对于三种主要的 VOC,NPS 样本的 Ct 值明显低于唾液样本。然而,与 Alpha 和 Delta 变体相比,奥密克戎变体的差异不那么明显。相反,在唾液样本中,奥密克戎变体的 Ct 值明显低于 Delta(差异 2.7 Ct)和 Alpha(差异 3.0 Ct)变体,证实了唾液中的病毒载量更高。总之,与 Alpha 和 Delta 变体相比,奥密克戎变体的唾液中病毒载量更高,这表明在新变异出现时,可能需要对现有的 SARS-CoV-2 诊断方法进行重新验证。随着新变异的出现,SARS-CoV-2 诊断的既定方法可能需要重新验证。这对于筛选策略计划以及研究新变体的特征(包括靶向性改变和病毒载量增加导致传播)非常重要。与鼻咽样本相比,SARS-CoV-2 唾液样本的 RT-PCR 筛查报告的性能较低,但可以接受。由于奥密克戎变异株对上呼吸道的亲和力更好,因此与鼻咽拭子相比,在唾液中检测奥密克戎变异株可能更有优势。我们的研究分析了法国三个主要波期间(Alpha、Delta 和 Omicron)的 1,289 个阳性 RT-PCR 结果。我们的研究结果还表明,与 Alpha 和 Delta 变体相比,奥密克戎变体的唾液中病毒载量更高。