Lin Quanhong, Tian Di, Zhao Changti, Wang Bin, Yan Zhengbing, Stocker Benjamin D, Li Yu'e, Fang Jingyun
The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Photosynth Res. 2023 Feb;155(2):139-146. doi: 10.1007/s11120-022-00980-1. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
Using steady-state photosynthesis-intercellular CO concentration (A-C) response curves to obtain the maximum rates of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase carboxylation (V) and electron transport (J) is time-consuming and labour-intensive. Instead, the rapid A-C response (RACiR) technique provides a potential, high-efficiency method. However, efficient parameter settings of RACiR technique for evergreen broadleaved species remain unclear. Here, we used Li-COR LI-6800 to obtain the optimum parameter settings of RACiR curves for evergreen broadleaved trees and shrubs. We set 11 groups of CO gradients ([CO]), i.e. R1 (400-1500 ppm), R2 (400-200-800 ppm), R3 (420-20-620 ppm), R4 (420-20-820 ppm), R5 (420-20-1020 ppm), R6 (420-20-1220 ppm), R7 (420-20-1520 ppm), R8 (420-20-1820 ppm), R9 (450-50-650 ppm), R10 (650-50 ppm) and R11 (650-50-650 ppm), and then compared the differences between steady-state A-C and RACiR curves. We found that V and J calculated by steady-state A-C and RACiR curves overall showed no significant differences across 11 [CO] gradients (P > 0.05). For the studied evergreens, the efficiency and accuracy of R2, R3, R4, R9 and R10 were higher than the others. Hence, we recommend that the [CO] gradients of R2, R3, R4, R9 and R10 could be applied preferentially for measurements when using the RACiR technique to obtain V and J of evergreen broadleaved species.
利用稳态光合作用-细胞间二氧化碳浓度(A-C)响应曲线来获取核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶加氧酶羧化作用(V)和电子传递(J)的最大速率既耗时又费力。相比之下,快速A-C响应(RACiR)技术提供了一种潜在的高效方法。然而,常绿阔叶树种RACiR技术的有效参数设置仍不明确。在此,我们使用Li-COR LI-6800来获取常绿阔叶乔木和灌木RACiR曲线的最佳参数设置。我们设置了11组二氧化碳梯度([CO]),即R1(400 - 1500 ppm)、R2(400 - 200 - 800 ppm)、R3(420 - 20 - 620 ppm)、R4(420 - 20 - 820 ppm)、R5(420 - 20 - 1020 ppm)、R6(420 - 20 - 1220 ppm)、R7(420 - 20 - 1520 ppm)、R8(420 - 20 - 1820 ppm)、R9(450 - 50 - 650 ppm)、R10(650 - 50 ppm)和R11(650 - 50 - 650 ppm),然后比较稳态A-C曲线和RACiR曲线之间的差异。我们发现,通过稳态A-C曲线和RACiR曲线计算得到的V和J在11个[CO]梯度上总体无显著差异(P > 0.05)。对于所研究的常绿植物,R2、R3、R4、R9和R10的效率和准确性高于其他组。因此,我们建议在使用RACiR技术获取常绿阔叶树种的V和J时,可优先应用R2、R3、R4、R9和R10的[CO]梯度进行测量。