Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Blood Transfus. 2023 May;21(3):218-226. doi: 10.2450/2022.0141-22. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is a leading cause of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. TACO follows a two-hit pathophysiology, where comorbidities like cardiac or renal failure act as the first hit followed by blood transfusion as a second hit. Observational studies suggest that plasma transfusion is more likely to cause TACO than other blood products. We conducted a randomized animal study to gather evidence that plasma transfusion can induce TACO.
As a first hit a large myocardial infarction was created in male Wistar rats. Then animals were randomized to receive 4 units of solvent/ detergent-treated pooled plasma (SDP), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), a colloid control (albumin 5%) or a crystalloid fluid control (Ringer's lactate) (n=10 per group). The primary outcome was the difference between pre- and post-transfusion left-ventricular end diastolic pressure (ΔLVEDP). Secondary outcomes were markers for acute lung injury; lung wet/dry weight ratio, PaO/FiO ratio and pulmonary histological assessment.
Pre-transfusion characteristics were similar between groups. ΔLVEDP increased significantly after transfusion with SDP (7.7 mmHg; 4.5-10.5) and albumin (13.0 mmHg; 6.5-15.2), but not after FFP (7.9 mmHg, 1.1; 11.3) compared to infusion with Ringer's lactate (0.6 mmHg; 0.4-2.2), p=0.007, p=0.0005 and p=0.14 respectively. There were no significant differences in ΔLVEDP between groups receiving SDP, FFP or albumin. There was no increase in acute lung injury in any group compared to other groups.
Circulatory overload, measured as ΔLVEDP, was induced after transfusion of SDP or albumin, but not after infusion of Ringer's lactate. These results show that the effect of plasma transfusion on ΔLVEDP differs from fluid overload induced by crystalloid infusion. Colloid osmotic pressure may be an important component in the development of TACO and should be a target for future research.
输血相关循环超负荷(TACO)是输血相关发病率和死亡率的主要原因。TACO 遵循双打击病理生理学,其中合并症如心力衰竭或肾衰竭是第一次打击,随后输血是第二次打击。观察性研究表明,与其他血液制品相比,血浆输注更有可能引起 TACO。我们进行了一项随机动物研究,以收集证据表明血浆输注可引起 TACO。
作为第一次打击,雄性 Wistar 大鼠中创建了大面积心肌梗死。然后,动物随机分为接受 4 单位溶剂/去污剂处理的混合血浆(SDP)、新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)、胶体对照(白蛋白 5%)或晶体液对照(林格氏乳酸盐)(每组 10 只)。主要结局是输血前后左心室舒张末期压(ΔLVEDP)的差异。次要结局是急性肺损伤标志物;肺湿/干重比、PaO/FiO 比和肺组织学评估。
输血前特征在各组之间相似。与林格氏乳酸盐输注(0.6 mmHg;0.4-2.2)相比,SDP(7.7 mmHg;4.5-10.5)和白蛋白(13.0 mmHg;6.5-15.2)输注后 ΔLVEDP 显著增加,而 FFP 输注后(7.9 mmHg,1.1;11.3)差异无统计学意义,p=0.007,p=0.0005 和 p=0.14。接受 SDP、FFP 或白蛋白的各组之间 ΔLVEDP 无显著差异。与其他组相比,任何组的急性肺损伤均无增加。
SDP 或白蛋白输注后可引起循环超负荷,以 ΔLVEDP 测量,而林格氏乳酸盐输注后则不会。这些结果表明,与晶体液输注引起的容量超负荷相比,血浆输注对 ΔLVEDP 的影响不同。胶体渗透压可能是 TACO 发展的一个重要组成部分,应成为未来研究的目标。