Suppr超能文献

当代新型输液产品的胶体渗透压。

Colloid osmotic pressure of contemporary and novel transfusion products.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2020 Nov;115(8):664-675. doi: 10.1111/vox.12932. Epub 2020 May 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Colloid osmotic pressure (COP) is a principal determinant of intravascular fluid homeostasis and a pillar of fluid therapy and transfusion. Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is a leading complication of transfusion, and COP could be responsible for recruiting additional fluid. Study objective was to measure COP of blood products as well as investigate the effects of product concentration and storage lesion on COP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three units of each product were sampled longitudinally. COP was measured directly as well as the determinants thereof albumin and total protein. Conventional blood products, that is red blood cell (RBC), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet concentrates (PLTs), were compared with their concentrated counterparts: volume-reduced RBCs, hyperconcentrated PLTs, and fully and partially reconstituted lyophilized plasma (prLP). Fresh and maximally stored products were measured to determine changes in protein and COP. We calculated potential volume load (PVL) to estimate volume recruited using albumin's water binding per product.

RESULTS

Colloid osmotic pressure varies widely between conventional products (RBCs, 1·9; PLTs, 7·5; and FFP, 20·1 mmHg); however, all are hypooncotic compared with human plasma COP (25·4 mmHg). Storage lesion did not increase COP. Concentrating RBCs and PLTs did not increase COP; only prLP showed a supraphysiological COP of 47·3 mm Hg. The PVL of concentrated products was lower than conventional products.

CONCLUSION

Colloid osmotic pressure of conventional products was low. Therefore, third-space fluid recruitment is an unlikely mechanism in TACO. Concentrated products had a lower calculated fluid load and may prevent TACO. Finally, storage did not significantly increase oncotic pressure of blood products.

摘要

背景和目的

胶体渗透压(COP)是血管内液稳态的主要决定因素,也是液体治疗和输血的基础。输血相关循环超负荷(TACO)是输血的主要并发症,COP 可能负责募集额外的液体。研究目的是测量血液制品的 COP,并研究产品浓度和储存损伤对 COP 的影响。

材料和方法

每个产品均进行了纵向采样,共采集 3 个单位。直接测量 COP 以及白蛋白和总蛋白等决定因素。将常规血液制品(即红细胞[RBC]、新鲜冷冻血浆[FFP]和血小板浓缩物[PLTs])与浓缩制品(体积减少的 RBC、超浓缩的 PLTs 以及完全和部分复溶的冻干血浆[prLP])进行比较。测量新鲜和最大储存的产品以确定蛋白质和 COP 的变化。我们计算了潜在的体积负荷(PVL),以估计每种产品白蛋白的水结合所募集的体积。

结果

常规产品的 COP 差异很大(RBC:1.9mmHg;PLTs:7.5mmHg;FFP:20.1mmHg);然而,与人类血浆 COP(25.4mmHg)相比,所有产品均为低渗性。储存损伤不会增加 COP。浓缩 RBC 和 PLTs 不会增加 COP;只有 prLP 表现出超生理 COP(47.3mmHg)。浓缩产品的 PVL 低于常规产品。

结论

常规产品的 COP 较低。因此,在 TACO 中,第三间隙液体募集不太可能是一种机制。浓缩产品的计算液体负荷较低,可能预防 TACO。最后,储存不会显著增加血液制品的胶体渗透压。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/904d/7754447/e09915287450/VOX-115-664-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验