• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我现在尽量避免与医疗专业人员互动”:创伤性脑损伤患者的医疗体验。

"I Avoid Interactions With Medical Professionals as Much as Possible Now": Health Care Experiences of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injuries.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.

Moravian University, Bethlehem, PA.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 23;32(2S):848-866. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00103. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

DOI:10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00103
PMID:36346972
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the perceptions of health care experiences by individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) across the recovery continuum, regarding care received by a variety of health care providers following their TBI. It sought to identify whether perceptions differed across mild, moderate, and severe participants, as well as acute, subacute, and chronic recovery.

METHOD

Eighteen individuals with TBI were interviewed, using the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale-Second Edition (SPRS-2) and a semistructured interview about health care perceptions. A qualitative investigation employing two methods, interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL; modality and appraisal analysis), provided a micro and macrolevel discourse analysis.

RESULTS

IPA analyses of SPRS-2 interviews differed across severity levels but included changes to relationships, identity, and changes to social engagement and activity. IPA results revealed three core themes related to the health care experiences across severity that encompassed (a) frustrations with providers and (b) lack of support in the chronic phase, and (c) that finding support is crucial. SFL results provided insight into how individuals appraised such experiences in light of their identity and personal perspectives. Key differences between individuals with mild, moderate, and severe TBI diagnoses were found, with those who experienced a mild TBI expressing the most discontent with services received. Participants were most satisfied with acute care and least satisfied with chronic phase support.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have significant implications for health care professionals interacting with individuals who have experienced a TBI. Facilitating improved communication, referrals, increased access to mental health counseling, and resources such as groups to support identity expression could improve the health care experience.

摘要

目的

本研究通过对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者在整个康复过程中对医疗体验的感知进行调查,研究了他们在 TBI 后接受各种医疗服务提供者的治疗的情况。本研究旨在确定感知是否因轻度、中度和重度参与者以及急性、亚急性和慢性康复而有所不同。

方法

使用悉尼心理社会康复量表第二版(SPRS-2)和半结构化访谈对 18 名 TBI 患者进行访谈,以了解他们对医疗保健的看法。采用两种方法,即解释现象学分析(IPA)和系统功能语言学(SFL;模态和评价分析)进行定性研究,提供了微观和宏观层面的话语分析。

结果

SPRS-2 访谈的 IPA 分析因严重程度而异,但包括人际关系、身份和社会参与和活动的变化。IPA 结果揭示了与严重程度相关的三个核心主题,包括(a)对提供者的不满和(b)慢性阶段缺乏支持,以及(c)寻找支持至关重要。SFL 结果提供了如何根据个人身份和个人观点来评价这些经历的见解。发现轻度、中度和重度 TBI 诊断的个体之间存在显著差异,经历轻度 TBI 的个体对所接受的服务最不满意。参与者对急性护理最满意,对慢性阶段的支持最不满意。

结论

这项研究的结果对与经历过 TBI 的个体互动的医疗保健专业人员具有重要意义。改善沟通、转介、增加心理健康咨询的机会以及提供支持身份表达的资源,如团体,可以改善医疗保健体验。

相似文献

1
"I Avoid Interactions With Medical Professionals as Much as Possible Now": Health Care Experiences of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injuries.“我现在尽量避免与医疗专业人员互动”:创伤性脑损伤患者的医疗体验。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 23;32(2S):848-866. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00103. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
2
Perceptions of communication recovery following traumatic brain injury: A qualitative investigation across 2 years.创伤性脑损伤后沟通康复的认知:跨 2 年的定性研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):463-482. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12795. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Living with traumatic brain injury in a rural setting: supports and barriers across the continuum of care.农村地区创伤性脑损伤患者的生活:连续护理过程中的支持与障碍
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Oct;39(20):2071-2080. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1217081. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Traumatic Brain Injury Severity, Comorbidity, Social Support, Family Functioning, and Community Reintegration Among Veterans of the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars.阿富汗和伊拉克战争退伍军人的创伤性脑损伤严重程度、合并症、社会支持、家庭功能和社区重新融入。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2S):S40-S49. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
The experiences and perceptions of employers and caregivers of individuals with mild-moderate traumatic brain injury in returning to work.轻度至中度创伤性脑损伤患者的雇主和照料者对其重返工作岗位的经历与看法。
Work. 2019;64(2):355-370. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192997.
6
A group memory rehabilitation programme for people with traumatic brain injuries: the ReMemBrIn RCT.创伤性脑损伤患者的团体记忆康复方案:ReMemBrIn RCT 研究
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Apr;23(16):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta23160.
7
A qualitative investigation of masculine identity after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后男性身份的定性研究。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Mar;30(2):298-314. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1466714. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
8
Rehabilitation needs and participation restriction in patients with cognitive disorder in the chronic phase of traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤慢性期认知障碍患者的康复需求与参与限制
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(4):e5968. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005968.
9
Barriers and Facilitators to Accessing Rehabilitation Health Care: A Veterans Affairs Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Qualitative Study.获得康复医疗服务的障碍与促进因素:一项退伍军人事务部创伤性脑损伤模型系统定性研究
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Mar;104(3):380-389. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.020. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
10
Experiences of caregivers and individuals living with traumatic brain injury in accessing health information: a qualitative investigation.创伤性脑损伤患者及其照顾者获取健康信息的经历:一项定性研究
Brain Inj. 2023 Mar 21;37(4):293-302. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2145366. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
An Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention Tool for Memory in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and Usability of Memory Ecological Momentary Intervention.一种用于慢性创伤性脑损伤记忆的生态瞬时评估与干预工具:记忆生态瞬时干预的开发与可用性
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Nov 26;11:e59630. doi: 10.2196/59630.
2
A Directed Content Analysis for Greatest Problems Among People With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.针对有和没有创伤性脑损伤的人群中最大问题的定向内容分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan;106(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 24.