• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Directed Content Analysis for Greatest Problems Among People With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.针对有和没有创伤性脑损伤的人群中最大问题的定向内容分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan;106(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Telehealth administration of narrative and procedural discourse: A UK and US comparison of traumatic brain injury and matched controls.远程医疗管理叙述和程序话语:英国和美国创伤性脑损伤及匹配对照组的比较。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):519-531. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12813. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
5
Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Incident Comorbidities.创伤性脑损伤与共病发生风险
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2450499. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.50499.
6
Insights into social communication following traumatic brain injury sustained in older adulthood.成年后期创伤性脑损伤后社会交流的洞察。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):449-462. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12837. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
Elevation of the head during intensive care management in people with severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤患者在重症监护管理期间抬高床头。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD009986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009986.pub2.
9
Co-Occurrence of Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in a National Sample of UK Police Officers: Impact on Social Well-Being and Employment Outcomes.英国警官全国样本中创伤性脑损伤与创伤后应激障碍的共病情况:对社会幸福感和就业结果的影响
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2025;40(4):247-257. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001041. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
10
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.

本文引用的文献

1
A 'Network of Understanding and Compassion': A Qualitative Study of Survivor Perspectives on Unmet Needs After Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in Regional Communities.“理解与同情网络”:对地区社区创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后未满足需求的幸存者观点的定性研究。
Brain Impair. 2023 Mar;24(1):27-38. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2021.18. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Psychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury - future directions in research.创伤性脑损伤的精神后遗症-研究的未来方向。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2023 Sep;19(9):556-571. doi: 10.1038/s41582-023-00853-8. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
3
Traumatic brain injury as a chronic disease: insights from the United States Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Research Program.创伤性脑损伤作为一种慢性病:来自美国创伤性脑损伤模型系统研究计划的见解。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Jun;22(6):517-528. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00065-0. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Ten-Year Cohort Study of Emotional Distress Trajectories After Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.中度至重度创伤性脑损伤后情绪困扰轨迹的十年队列研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jul;104(7):1081-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
5
Measurement Properties of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4) and Related Measures: A Systematic Review. Mayo-Portland 适应能力量表(MPAI-4)及相关测量工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug;104(8):1300-1313. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.12.196. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
6
"I Avoid Interactions With Medical Professionals as Much as Possible Now": Health Care Experiences of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injuries.“我现在尽量避免与医疗专业人员互动”:创伤性脑损伤患者的医疗体验。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Mar 23;32(2S):848-866. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00103. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
7
Return to School Outcomes among Adults with TBI One Year After Rehabilitation Discharge: A TBIMS Study.脑外伤成年人康复出院后一年的返校结果:一项 TBIMS 研究。
Brain Inj. 2022 Jul 3;36(8):1000-1009. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2105952. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
8
Change in Gender on Record and Transgender Adults' Mental or Behavioral Health.记录中性别改变与跨性别成年人的精神或行为健康。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 May;62(5):696-704. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.10.016. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Systematic Review of Sex and Gender Effects in Traumatic Brain Injury: Equity in Clinical and Functional Outcomes.创伤性脑损伤中性别和性别的影响的系统评价:临床和功能结果的公平性
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 10;12:678971. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.678971. eCollection 2021.
10
Unmet Rehabilitation Needs after Traumatic Brain Injury across Europe: Results from the CENTER-TBI Study.欧洲创伤性脑损伤后未满足的康复需求:CENTER-TBI研究结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 3;10(5):1035. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051035.

针对有和没有创伤性脑损伤的人群中最大问题的定向内容分析。

A Directed Content Analysis for Greatest Problems Among People With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Dudek Emily, Williams Michael W, Kew Chung Lin Novelle, DeMello Annalyn, Wright Brittany, Holland Alexandra B, Day-Gorman Alyssa, Gonzalez Alexa S, Leon Novelo Luis, Liu Xiangyi, Juengst Shannon B

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston.

Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan;106(1):42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.008
PMID:39187005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11695172/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the greatest problem or need among individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), as compared with individuals with a history of other neurologic conditions, mental health conditions, and no history of neurologic or mental health conditions.

DESIGN

A directed content analysis of open-text responses to a single online survey question using a framework guided by the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4.

SETTING

Community.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2861 community-dwelling adults (n=274 with TBI; n=289 with other neurologic conditions besides TBI; n=454 with mental health conditions but no neurologic conditions; and n=1844 controls).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Open-text responses to the survey prompt: "What was your greatest problem or need over the past 2 weeks?"

RESULTS

The Participation index comprised the greatest proportion of responses across all 4 participant groups. A quarter (25.4%) of controls reported None (no problem/need), whereas only 7.9%-10.7% of participants in all other groups reported None. Among all groups, individuals with TBI reported the greatest proportion of problems in the Adjustment and Ability indices. Among people with TBI, Money Management (19.7%), None (10.6%), and Anxiety (7.7%) were the 3 most frequently reported problems. Compared with individuals with mild TBI (mTBI), individuals with moderate-to-severe TBI (msTBI) reported a higher proportion of problems in the Ability and Adjustment indices. Among individuals with msTBI, the Adjustment index accounted for the greatest proportion of problems.

CONCLUSIONS

This study employed a person-centered approach to understanding the greatest needs among individuals with TBI. Qualitative differences were observed between individuals with and without TBI, between people with mTBI and msTBI, and across genders among people with TBI. These findings can help guide research and policy toward addressing challenges perceived as highly important by people living in the community with TBI.

摘要

目的

与有其他神经系统疾病史、心理健康状况史以及无神经系统或心理健康状况史的个体相比,明确有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)病史的个体中最大的问题或需求。

设计

使用由梅奥-波特兰适应性量表-4指导的框架,对单个在线调查问题的开放式文本回答进行定向内容分析。

地点

社区。

参与者

总共2861名社区居住成年人(n = 274名有TBI;n = 289名有除TBI外的其他神经系统疾病;n = 454名有心理健康状况但无神经系统疾病;以及n = 1844名对照)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

对调查提示的开放式文本回答:“在过去两周里,你最大的问题或需求是什么?”

结果

参与指数在所有4个参与者组的回答中占比最大。四分之一(25.4%)的对照者报告无(无问题/需求),而所有其他组中只有7.9%-10.7%的参与者报告无。在所有组中,有TBI的个体在适应和能力指数方面报告的问题比例最高。在有TBI的人群中,资金管理(19.7%)、无(10.6%)和焦虑(7.7%)是最常报告的3个问题。与轻度TBI(mTBI)个体相比,中重度TBI(msTBI)个体在能力和适应指数方面报告的问题比例更高。在有msTBI的个体中,适应指数占问题的比例最大。

结论

本研究采用以人为主的方法来了解有TBI个体的最大需求。在有TBI和无TBI的个体之间、有mTBI和msTBI的个体之间以及有TBI的个体的不同性别之间观察到了质性差异。这些发现有助于指导研究和政策,以应对社区中有TBI的人认为非常重要的挑战。