Huntington Scott F, Appukkuttan Sreevalsa, Wang Wenyi, Du Yuxian, Hopson Sari, Babajanyan Svetlana
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Bayer Healthcare U.S. LLC, Whippany, New Jersey.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022 Oct 24;9(2):115-122. doi: 10.36469/001c.38070. eCollection 2022.
A consensus is lacking on optimal treatment sequencing for follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common indolent lymphoma. FL is incurable, and many patients require multiple lines of therapy for successive relapses. Guidelines provide numerous recommendations for first-, second-, and third-line therapy; however, treatment patterns in the real world remain poorly understood. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate real-world treatment patterns among commercially insured patients with FL in the United States. A retrospective cohort of patients with newly diagnosed FL was identified from June 2008 to September 2016 using the IBM MarketScan® database. Treatment pattern measures, including time to treatment from diagnosis, days from previous line of therapy, duration of therapy, and distribution of treatment regimens among lines of therapy, were assessed. Descriptive statistics were reported for baseline characteristics, primary outcome, and treatment pattern measures. In total, 4232 patients were identified from the database and 2111 patients received at least 1 line of treatment. The most common first-line treatments included bendamustine + rituximab (39%), rituximab + cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + vincristine (20%), and rituximab monotherapy (19%). Rituximab monotherapy was the most common second-line (34%) and third or greater line (57%) treatment. The median time from FL diagnosis to initiation of treatment was 50 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-191) for first-line treatment, 577 days (IQR: 312-1146) for second-line, and 776 days (IQR: 603-1290) for third-line. At a median follow-up of 3.6 years, most patients had 1 or fewer lines of therapy. The use of combination therapy decreased with each line of therapy and the numbers of patients receiving third- or fourth-line therapy were small in this study, potentially due to the short follow-up. Rituximab as monotherapy or in combination was utilized most frequently; however, the variety of other therapies used demonstrates that the standard management of FL remains unclear. Consensus on optimal treatment sequencing is currently lacking, and patients receive a variety of active regimens during routine practice. In this contemporary cohort of patients diagnosed with FL in the United States, rituximab therapy predominated both in monotherapy and in combination.
对于滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)这种最常见的惰性淋巴瘤,目前尚无关于最佳治疗顺序的共识。FL无法治愈,许多患者因疾病连续复发需要接受多线治疗。指南针对一线、二线和三线治疗提供了众多建议;然而,现实世界中的治疗模式仍知之甚少。本研究的主要目的是评估美国商业保险的FL患者的现实世界治疗模式。利用IBM MarketScan®数据库,确定了2008年6月至2016年9月期间新诊断FL患者的回顾性队列。评估了治疗模式指标,包括从诊断到开始治疗的时间、距上一线治疗的天数、治疗持续时间以及各治疗线之间治疗方案的分布。报告了基线特征、主要结局和治疗模式指标的描述性统计数据。从数据库中总共识别出4232例患者,其中2111例患者接受了至少1线治疗。最常见的一线治疗包括苯达莫司汀+利妥昔单抗(39%)、利妥昔单抗+环磷酰胺+多柔比星+长春新碱(20%)和利妥昔单抗单药治疗(19%)。利妥昔单抗单药治疗是最常见的二线治疗(34%)和三线及以上治疗(57%)。一线治疗从FL诊断到开始治疗的中位时间为50天(四分位间距[IQR]:28 - 191),二线为577天(IQR:312 - 1146),三线为776天(IQR:603 - 1290)。中位随访3.6年时,大多数患者接受的治疗线数为1线或更少。联合治疗的使用随着治疗线数的增加而减少,并且在本研究中接受三线或四线治疗的患者数量较少,这可能是由于随访时间短。利妥昔单抗单药治疗或联合治疗使用最为频繁;然而,所使用的其他多种疗法表明FL的标准管理仍不明确。目前缺乏关于最佳治疗顺序的共识,并且患者在常规治疗期间接受了多种有效的治疗方案。在这个美国当代诊断为FL的患者队列中,利妥昔单抗治疗在单药治疗和联合治疗中均占主导地位。