School of Law, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 Nov-Dec;85:101841. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2022.101841. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
This article examines the development of the law relating to decision-making on behalf of adults that lack capacity in Scotland, Ireland and Northern Ireland. Using two points of tension evident in the recent Northern Irish legislative consultation process, namely the suitability of the 'best interests' standard and international debate regarding domestic compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (United Nations, 2006) this contribution exposes the impact of international human rights and influence of external actors, principally advocacy groups and their individual members, on the resulting legislation. Given the recency of the Irish and Northern Irish legislation and the current law reform review in Scotland, the article concludes by highlighting points of tension that may emerge between domestic standards for decision-making and the CRPD.
本文考察了苏格兰、爱尔兰和北爱尔兰在代表无行为能力成年人做出决策方面相关法律的发展。本文利用北爱尔兰最近立法协商过程中出现的两个紧张点,即“最佳利益”标准的适宜性,以及国际上关于国内遵守《联合国残疾人权利公约》(联合国,2006 年)的争论,揭示了国际人权的影响和外部行为体的影响,主要是倡导团体及其个别成员,对立法的影响。鉴于爱尔兰和北爱尔兰立法的时间不长,以及苏格兰目前的法律改革审查,本文最后强调了国内决策标准与《残疾人权利公约》之间可能出现的紧张点。