Hoffman Steven J, Sritharan Lathika, Tejpar Ali
Global Strategy Lab, Centre for Health Law, Policy & Ethics, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, 57 Louis Pasteur Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Department of Global Health & Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2016 Nov 11;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12914-016-0103-1.
Persons with psychosocial disabilities face disparate access to healthcare and social services worldwide, along with systemic discrimination, structural inequalities, and widespread human rights abuses. Accordingly, many people have looked to international human rights law to help address mental health challenges. On December 13, 2006, the United Nations formally adopted the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) - the first human rights treaty of the 21st century and the fastest ever negotiated.
This study assesses the CRPD's potential impact on mental health systems and presents a legal and public policy analysis of its implementation in one high-income country: Canada. As part of this analysis, a critical review was undertaken of the CRPD's implementation in Canadian legislation, public policy, and jurisprudence related to mental health.
While the Convention is clearly an important step forward, there remains a divide, even in Canada, between the Convention's goals and the experiences of Canadians with disabilities. Its implementation is perhaps hindered most by Canada's reservations to Article 12 of the CRPD on legal capacity for persons with psychosocial disabilities. The overseeing CRPD Committee has stated that Article 12 only permits "supported decision-making" regimes, yet most Canadian jurisdictions maintain their "substitute decision-making" regimes. This means that many Canadians with mental health challenges continue to be denied legal capacity to make decisions related to their healthcare, housing, and finances. But changes are afoot: new legislation has been introduced in different jurisdictions across the country, and recent court decisions have started to push policymakers in this direction.
Despite the lack of explicit implementation, the CRPD has helped to facilitate a larger shift in social and cultural paradigms of mental health and disability in Canada. But ratification and passive implementation are not enough. Further efforts are needed to implement the CRPD's provisions and promote the equal enjoyment of human rights by all Canadian citizens - and presumably for all other people too, from the poorest to the wealthiest countries.
在全球范围内,患有心理社会残疾的人在获得医疗保健和社会服务方面面临差异对待,同时还遭受系统性歧视、结构性不平等以及广泛的人权侵犯。因此,许多人期望借助国际人权法来应对心理健康挑战。2006年12月13日,联合国正式通过了《残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)——这是21世纪的首个国际人权条约,也是谈判速度最快的条约。
本研究评估了《残疾人权利公约》对心理健康系统的潜在影响,并对其在一个高收入国家——加拿大的实施情况进行了法律和公共政策分析。作为该分析的一部分,对《残疾人权利公约》在加拿大与心理健康相关的立法、公共政策和判例法中的实施情况进行了批判性审查。
尽管该公约显然是向前迈出的重要一步,但即使在加拿大,公约目标与加拿大残疾人的实际经历之间仍存在差距。加拿大对《残疾人权利公约》关于心理社会残疾者法律行为能力的第12条的保留意见可能是其实施的最大阻碍。监督《残疾人权利公约》的委员会表示,第12条仅允许“辅助性决策”制度,但加拿大大多数司法管辖区仍维持其“替代性决策”制度。这意味着许多有心理健康问题的加拿大人在做出与医疗保健、住房和财务相关的决策时,其法律行为能力仍被剥夺。但变化正在发生:加拿大各地不同司法管辖区已出台新立法,近期的法院判决也开始推动政策制定者朝着这个方向前进。
尽管缺乏明确的实施措施,但《残疾人权利公约》有助于推动加拿大心理健康和残疾领域社会与文化范式的更大转变。但批准和消极实施是不够的。需要进一步努力实施《残疾人权利公约》的各项规定,促进所有加拿大公民平等享有各项人权——大概对所有其他国家的人也是如此,无论从最贫穷国家到最富裕国家。