• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助化疗与辅助化疗在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的比较:一项全国性队列研究。

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, 06973, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Urology, Hyundae General Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01112-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-022-01112-6
PMID:36352437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9644507/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the trend of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision (NUx) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) to compare the perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) between AC and NAC using nationwide population-based data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected data on patients diagnosed with UTUC and treated with NUx between 2004 and 2016 using the National Health Insurance Service database, and evaluated the overall treatment trends. The AC and NAC groups were propensity score-matched. Cox proportional hazard and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess survival.

RESULTS

Of the 8,705 enrolled patients, 6,627 underwent NUx only, 94 underwent NAC, and 1,984 underwent AC. The rate of NUx without perioperative chemotherapy increased from 70.8 to 78.2% (R = 0.632; p < 0.001). The rates of dialysis (p = 0.398), TUR-BT (p = 1.000), and radiotherapy (p = 0.497) after NUx were similar. In the Kaplan-Meier curve, the NAC and AC groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.480). In multivariate analysis, treatment with AC or NAC was not associated with OS (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.49-1.40, p = 0.477).

CONCLUSION

The use of NUx without perioperative chemotherapy has tended to increase in South Korea. Dialysis, TUR-BT, and radiotherapy rates after NUx were similar between the NAC and AC groups. There was no significant difference in OS between the NAC and AC groups. Proper perioperative chemotherapy according to patient and tumor conditions should be determined by obtaining more evidence of UTUC.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估接受根治性肾输尿管切除术和膀胱袖状切除术(NUx)治疗上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者接受辅助化疗(AC)和新辅助化疗(NAC)的趋势,使用全国基于人群的数据比较 AC 和 NAC 之间的围手术期结局和总生存期(OS)。

材料和方法

我们使用国家健康保险服务数据库收集了 2004 年至 2016 年间诊断为 UTUC 并接受 NUx 治疗的患者的数据,并评估了整体治疗趋势。对 AC 和 NAC 组进行倾向评分匹配。使用 Cox 比例风险和 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估生存情况。

结果

在纳入的 8705 例患者中,6627 例仅接受 NUx,94 例接受 NAC,1984 例接受 AC。无围手术期化疗的 NUx 率从 70.8%增加到 78.2%(R=0.632;p<0.001)。NUx 后透析(p=0.398)、TUR-BT(p=1.000)和放疗(p=0.497)的发生率相似。在 Kaplan-Meier 曲线中,NAC 和 AC 组之间无显著差异(p=0.480)。多变量分析显示,AC 或 NAC 治疗与 OS 无关(风险比 0.83,95%置信区间 0.49-1.40,p=0.477)。

结论

在韩国,无围手术期化疗的 NUx 使用率呈上升趋势。NAC 和 AC 组 NUx 后透析、TUR-BT 和放疗的发生率相似。NAC 和 AC 组之间 OS 无显著差异。应根据患者和肿瘤情况确定适当的围手术期化疗,并通过获得更多 UTUC 的证据来确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/301768e5cf91/12894_2022_1112_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/d26f38aaeb12/12894_2022_1112_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/808462b31404/12894_2022_1112_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/917febb589cc/12894_2022_1112_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/301768e5cf91/12894_2022_1112_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/d26f38aaeb12/12894_2022_1112_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/808462b31404/12894_2022_1112_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/917febb589cc/12894_2022_1112_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2e1/9644507/301768e5cf91/12894_2022_1112_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A nationwide cohort study.新辅助化疗与辅助化疗在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的比较:一项全国性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01112-6.
2
Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy.新辅助和辅助化疗治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:2020 年系统评价和荟萃分析,以及系统治疗的未来展望。
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):635-654. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have therapeutic benefit for node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma? Results of a multi-center cohort study.新辅助化疗对淋巴结阳性上尿路尿路上皮癌有治疗益处吗?一项多中心队列研究的结果。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Mar;40(3):105.e19-105.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.029. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
4
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.新辅助化疗与辅助化疗治疗上尿路上皮癌。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Aug;38(8):684.e9-684.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Adjuvant Chemotherapy vs Observation for Patients With Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Cystectomy Previously Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后行根治性膀胱切除术且病理检查有不良特征的患者采用辅助化疗与观察的比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;4(2):225-229. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2374.
6
Perioperative chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review.上尿路尿路上皮癌的围手术期化疗:全面综述。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1401-1407. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1995-z. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助和辅助化疗治疗局限性和局部进展性上尿路上皮癌的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;25(6):1037-1054. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01650-9. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
8
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.新辅助化疗可改善上尿路上皮癌患者的生存。
Cancer. 2014 Jun 15;120(12):1794-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28655. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
9
Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Microsimulation Model.新辅助化疗与辅助化疗治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的比较:一项微观模拟模型研究。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Apr;19(2):e135-e147. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
Contemporary Trends of Systemic Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Intravesical Chemotherapy in Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas Undergoing Minimally Invasive or Open Radical Nephroureterectomy: Analysis of US Claims on Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs.微创或开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路上皮癌患者的全身新辅助和辅助膀胱内化疗的当代趋势:美国围手术期结局和医疗保健成本索赔分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Apr;20(2):198.e1-198.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Urothelial Carcinoma Outcomes: The Powerful Combination of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Perioperative Period.改善尿路上皮癌的治疗效果:围手术期新辅助化疗与辅助化疗的强效联合
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17154-7.
2
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Real-World, Retrospective Study.上尿路尿路上皮癌的辅助化疗:一项真实世界的回顾性研究。
Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;56(3):871-876. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.1226. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer: a nationwide cohort study.新辅助化疗与辅助化疗治疗膀胱癌的比较:一项全国性队列研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov;148(11):3135-3144. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03926-1. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
2
Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Impact of Cisplatin Delivery on Renal Function and Local Control Rate in the Randomized Phase III VESPER (GETUG-AFU V05) Trial.肌层浸润性膀胱癌的化疗:随机 III 期 VESPER(GETUG-AFU V05)试验中顺铂给药对肾功能和局部控制率的影响。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Dec;19(6):554-562. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
Rising incidence rates and unaltered survival rates for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a Dutch population-based study from 1993 to 2017.
原发性上尿路尿路上皮癌发病率上升而生存率未改变:1993 年至 2017 年荷兰基于人群的研究。
BJU Int. 2021 Sep;128(3):343-351. doi: 10.1111/bju.15389. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Incidence and Survival Rates of Contemporary Patients with Invasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.当代浸润性上尿路上皮癌患者的发病率和生存率。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Oct;4(5):792-801. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy.新辅助和辅助化疗治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌:2020 年系统评价和荟萃分析,以及系统治疗的未来展望。
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):635-654. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
Adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (the POUT trial): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的辅助化疗(POUT 试验):一项 3 期、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1268-1277. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30415-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Followed by Extirpative Surgery in Patients with High Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.高级别上尿路尿路上皮癌患者新辅助全身化疗后根治性手术的 II 期临床试验。
J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):690-698. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000644. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
8
Clinical staging of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma for T staging: Review and pictorial essay.上尿路尿路上皮癌 T 分期的临床分期:综述与影像学评价。
Int J Urol. 2019 Nov;26(11):1024-1032. doi: 10.1111/iju.14068. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
9
An Analysis of Staging and Treatment Trends for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in the National Cancer Database.基于国家癌症数据库的上尿路尿路上皮癌分期和治疗趋势分析。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):e743-e750. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
10
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a different disease entity in terms of management.上尿路尿路上皮癌:在治疗方面是一种不同的疾病实体。
ESMO Open. 2017 Jan 24;1(6):e000126. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000126. eCollection 2016.