• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全肩关节置换术后的旅行距离并不影响手术结果。

Travel distance does not affect outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.

作者信息

Mehta Nabil, Lavoie-Gagne Ophelie Z, Diaz Connor C, Cohn Matthew R, Garrigues Grant E, Nicholson Gregory P, Verma Nikhil N, Forsythe Brian

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

JSES Int. 2022 Aug 17;6(6):903-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.001. eCollection 2022 Nov.

DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.001
PMID:36353437
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9637794/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of travel distance on achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on all three commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for the shoulder more than 1 year following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

METHODS

Patients undergoing reverse or anatomic TSA at a high-volume tertiary referral center between September 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: driving distance of >50 miles from the location of surgery (referral group) and driving distance of <50 miles (local group). Scores on preoperative and postoperative PROMs, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and Constant Score (CS) at minimum 1-year follow-up were assessed. Chi-square analysis was used to analyze the achievement of MCID on any PROM or a combination of PROMs. Logistic regression was performed to determine whether travel distance and other variables of interest had an effect on achieving MCID on all three PROMs.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients with minimum 1-year follow-up were included in the final analysis. Of these, 165 patients (77.1%) traveled <50 miles to their orthopedic provider at the time of surgery. The local group demonstrated significantly inferior preoperative SANE scores ( < .001) and significantly higher postoperative ASES scores ( = .001). A total of 166 (77%) patients achieved all three MCIDs postoperatively. There was no significant difference between distance groups for achievement of all MCIDs ( = .328). On multivariable regression, body mass index > 30 (odds ratio [OR], 5.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-30.28), worker's compensation status (OR, 16.78; 95% CI, 2.34-161.39), and higher preoperative ASES score (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07) were associated with an increased risk of failure to achieve all MCIDs ( < .05). Age, adjusted gross income, private insurance, and travel distance were not significantly associated with failure to achieve all MCIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for age, sex, and adjusted gross income, distance traveled to a high-volume referral center did not have an effect on achieving the MCID on all three commonly used PROMs for the shoulder at least 1 year after undergoing TSA. Elevated body mass index, worker's compensation status, and higher preoperative ASES score were associated with an increased risk of failure to achieve all MCIDs after TSA.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是确定在全肩关节置换术(TSA)后1年以上,出行距离对三种常用的肩关节患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2016年9月至2018年8月在一家大型三级转诊中心接受反向或解剖型TSA的患者。患者分为两组:手术地点出行距离>50英里(转诊组)和出行距离<50英里(本地组)。评估术前和术后PROMs的评分,包括美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、单评估数字评价(SANE)评分和至少1年随访时的常数评分(CS)。采用卡方分析来分析在任何一项PROM或多项PROM组合上达到MCID的情况。进行逻辑回归分析以确定出行距离和其他感兴趣的变量是否对在所有三项PROMs上达到MCID有影响。

结果

共有214例至少随访1年的患者纳入最终分析。其中,165例患者(77.1%)手术时到骨科医生处的出行距离<50英里。本地组术前SANE评分显著更低(<0.001),术后ASES评分显著更高(=0.001)。共有166例(77%)患者术后达到了所有三项MCID。在所有MCID的达成情况上,距离组之间无显著差异(=0.328)。在多变量回归分析中,体重指数>30(比值比[OR],5.78;95%置信区间[CI],1.53 - 30.28)、工伤赔偿状态(OR,16.78;95%CI,2.34 - 161.39)以及术前ASES评分更高(OR,1.04;95%CI,1.01 - 1.07)与未达到所有MCID的风险增加相关(<0.05)。年龄、调整后总收入、私人保险和出行距离与未达到所有MCID无显著关联。

结论

在控制年龄、性别和调整后总收入后,前往大型转诊中心的出行距离对TSA术后至少1年在三种常用的肩关节PROMs上达到MCID没有影响。体重指数升高、工伤赔偿状态以及术前ASES评分更高与TSA术后未达到所有MCID的风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9d/9637794/eb56e4e37e5f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9d/9637794/526378bb935e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9d/9637794/eb56e4e37e5f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9d/9637794/526378bb935e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9d/9637794/eb56e4e37e5f/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Travel distance does not affect outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.全肩关节置换术后的旅行距离并不影响手术结果。
JSES Int. 2022 Aug 17;6(6):903-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.08.001. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Travel Distance Does Not Affect Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术后的旅行距离不影响治疗结果。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec 24;4(2):e511-e517. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.10.030. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Establishing clinically significant outcome thresholds for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty.确立全肩关节置换术后 2 年的单评估数字评估的临床显著结果阈值。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):e137-e146. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.011. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
4
Travel Distance Does Not Affect Outcomes in Hip Preservation Surgery: A Case for Centers of Excellence.旅行距离不影响保髋手术的结果:支持卓越中心的一个案例。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar 20;8(3):2325967120908821. doi: 10.1177/2325967120908821. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Substantial Inconsistency and Variability Exists Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences for Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review.大量的最小临床重要差异在肩关节炎置换术结果中存在不一致性和可变性:系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1371-1383. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002164. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
Minimal important clinical difference values are not uniformly valid in the active duty military population recovering from shoulder surgery.最小有意义临床差异值在从肩部手术中恢复的现役军人中并非普遍有效。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Nov;33(11):e596-e605. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.044. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty.确定美国肩肘外科医生评分、简易肩部测试以及用于测量肩关节置换术后疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
8
Sex-related differences in PROMs prior to the outcome: comparison of preoperative PROMIS physical function scores in female vs. male patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.结局前患者报告结局量表中的性别差异:接受肩关节置换术的女性与男性患者术前PROMIS身体功能评分比较
JSES Int. 2023 Aug 3;7(6):2473-2475. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.012. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty?美国肩肘外科医生评分的何种变化代表着肩关节置换术后具有临床意义的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2672-2681. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4968-z. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
10
What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.哪些术前因素与 THA 后未达到最小临床重要差异有关?一项国际多中心研究的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1301-1312. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000667.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of patient characteristics and outcomes related to distance traveled to a tertiary center for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.分析与前往三级中心行初次反肩关节置换术相关的患者特征和结局。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jul;142(7):1421-1428. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03764-9. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Meaningful Clinical Applications of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedics.患者报告结局测量在骨科中的有意义的临床应用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 6;103(1):84-91. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00624.
3
Increasing incidence of primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.
美国原发性反式和解剖全肩关节置换术发病率的增加。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 May;30(5):1159-1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
4
A Geographic Population-level Analysis of Access to Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in the State of Texas.德克萨斯州全肩关节置换术获取途径的地理人群水平分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb 1;29(3):e143-e153. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00035.
5
Travel Distance Does Not Affect Outcomes in Hip Preservation Surgery: A Case for Centers of Excellence.旅行距离不影响保髋手术的结果:支持卓越中心的一个案例。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar 20;8(3):2325967120908821. doi: 10.1177/2325967120908821. eCollection 2020 Mar.
6
Practical Guide to Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcomes.患者报告结局评估实用指南
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):432-433. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4526.
7
Risk of poor outcomes in patients who are obese following total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者行全肩关节置换术和反式全肩关节置换术后不良结局的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):e359-e376. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.06.017.
8
Patient Reported Outcomes: The Foundation of Value.患者报告的结局:价值的基础。
J Orthop Trauma. 2019 Nov;33 Suppl 7:S53-S55. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001613.
9
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty.单一评估数值评估(SANE)是一种可靠的度量标准,可用于衡量肩关节置换术后临床显著改善的情况。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):2238-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.041. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
10
Establishing clinically significant outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.关节镜肩袖修复术后临床意义的建立。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 May;28(5):939-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.10.013. Epub 2019 Jan 24.