Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinicgrid.66875.3a, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Guadeloupe, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
mBio. 2022 Dec 20;13(6):e0132222. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01322-22. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
Preoperative pathogen identification in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is typically limited to synovial fluid culture. Whether sequencing-based approaches are of potential use in identification of pathogens in PJI, and if so which approach is ideal, is incompletely defined. The objective of the study was to analyze the accuracy of a 16S rRNA (rRNA) gene-based PCR followed by Sanger sequencing and/or targeted metagenomic sequencing approach (tMGS) performed on synovial fluid for PJI diagnosis. A retrospective study was conducted, analyzing synovial fluids tested between August 2020 and May 2021 at a single center. Subjects with hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow arthroplasties who had synovial fluid aspirated and clinically subjected to sequence-based testing and conventional culture were studied. A total of 154 subjects were included in the study; 118 had noninfectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF), while 36 had PJI. Clinical sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PJI were 69% and 100%, respectively, for the sequencing-based approach and 72% and 100%, respectively, for conventional culture ( = 0.74). The combination of both tests was more sensitive (83%) than culture alone ( = 0.04). Results of sequencing-based testing led to changes in treatment in four of 36 (11%) PJI subjects. Microbial identification was achieved using Sanger and next generation sequencing in 19 and 6 subjects, respectively. When combined with culture, the described 16S rRNA gene sequencing-based approach increased sensitivity compared to culture alone, suggesting its potential use in the diagnosis of PJI when synovial fluid culture is negative. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a dreadful complication of joint replacement. Noninvasive identification of infectious pathogens has been traditionnally limited to culture-based testing of synovial fluid which has poor sensitivity. Sanger and Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may be used for synovial fluid testing in PJI, but experience in routine practice is sparse. We used a targeted metagenomic sequencing approach for routine testing of synovial fluid involving NGS when Sanger sequencing had failed or was likely to fail. The objective of this study was to analyze the approach's performance for diagnosis of PJI in comparison to culture for testing synovial fluid. Overall, the sequencing-based approach was not superior to culture for diagnosis of PJI, but yielded positive results in some culture-negative samples.
术前在假体周围关节感染(PJI)患者中进行病原体鉴定通常仅限于关节滑液培养。基于测序的方法是否有可能用于鉴定 PJI 中的病原体,如果可以,哪种方法是理想的,目前还不完全清楚。本研究的目的是分析在单个中心进行的关节滑液中 16S rRNA(rRNA)基因基于 PCR 后进行 Sanger 测序和/或靶向宏基因组测序(tMGS)的方法对 PJI 诊断的准确性。本研究进行了一项回顾性研究,分析了 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 5 月在一个中心进行的关节滑液检测。研究对象为髋关节、膝关节、肩关节和肘关节置换术患者,他们的关节滑液被抽吸并进行了基于序列的检测和常规培养。共有 154 名受试者纳入研究;118 名患有非感染性关节置换失败(NIAF),36 名患有 PJI。基于测序的方法对 PJI 的临床敏感性和特异性分别为 69%和 100%,而常规培养的分别为 72%和 100%(=0.74)。与单独培养相比,两种检测方法的联合应用更敏感(83%)(=0.04)。基于测序的检测结果导致 36 例 PJI 患者中的 4 例(11%)治疗发生改变。使用 Sanger 和下一代测序分别在 19 例和 6 例患者中实现了微生物鉴定。当与培养相结合时,与单独培养相比,描述的 16S rRNA 基因测序方法增加了敏感性,提示其在关节滑液培养为阴性时用于 PJI 诊断的潜在用途。假体周围关节感染(PJI)是关节置换的一种可怕并发症。传统上,对感染性病原体的非侵入性识别仅限于关节滑液的基于培养的检测,其敏感性较差。Sanger 和下一代测序(NGS)可用于 PJI 关节滑液检测,但在常规实践中的经验很少。当 Sanger 测序失败或可能失败时,我们使用靶向宏基因组测序方法对关节滑液进行常规 NGS 检测。本研究的目的是分析该方法与关节滑液培养相比用于 PJI 诊断的性能。总的来说,基于测序的方法在诊断 PJI 方面并不优于培养,但在一些培养阴性的样本中产生了阳性结果。