• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双眼间时间整合持续时间差异的知觉后果。

Perceptual consequences of interocular differences in the duration of temporal integration.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Neuroscience Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2022 Nov 1;22(12):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.12.12.

DOI:10.1167/jov.22.12.12
PMID:36355360
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9652723/
Abstract

Temporal differences in visual information processing between the eyes can cause dramatic misperceptions of motion and depth. Processing delays between the eyes cause the Pulfrich effect: oscillating targets in the frontal plane are misperceived as moving along near-elliptical motion trajectories in depth (Pulfrich, 1922). Here, we explain a previously reported but poorly understood variant: the anomalous Pulfrich effect. When this variant is perceived, the illusory motion trajectory appears oriented left- or right-side back in depth, rather than aligned with the true direction of motion. Our data indicate that this perceived misalignment is due to interocular differences in neural temporal integration periods, as opposed to interocular differences in delay. For oscillating motion, differences in the duration of temporal integration dampen the effective motion amplitude in one eye relative to the other. In a dynamic analog of the Geometric effect in stereo-surface-orientation perception (Ogle, 1950), the different motion amplitudes cause the perceived misorientation of the motion trajectories. Forced-choice psychophysical experiments, conducted with both different spatial frequencies and different onscreen motion damping in the two eyes show that the perceived misorientation in depth is associated with the eye having greater motion damping. A target-tracking experiment provided more direct evidence that the anomalous Pulfrich effect is caused by interocular differences in temporal integration and delay. These findings highlight the computational hurdles posed to the visual system by temporal differences in sensory processing. Future work will explore how the visual system overcomes these challenges to achieve accurate perception.

摘要

眼睛之间的视觉信息处理的时间差异会导致运动和深度的明显错觉。眼睛之间的处理延迟会导致普夫吕克效应:在额状面上的振荡目标被误认为是在深度上沿着近椭圆形的运动轨迹移动(普夫吕克,1922 年)。在这里,我们解释了一个先前报道但理解不佳的变体:异常普夫吕克效应。当感知到这种变体时,虚幻的运动轨迹似乎在深度上向左侧或右侧向后定向,而不是与真实的运动方向对齐。我们的数据表明,这种感知到的错位是由于眼睛之间的神经时间整合周期的差异,而不是眼睛之间的延迟差异。对于振荡运动,时间整合持续时间的差异会使一只眼睛的有效运动幅度相对于另一只眼睛减弱。在立体表面方向感知中的几何效应的动态模拟中(奥格尔,1950 年),不同的运动幅度会导致运动轨迹的感知错位。使用不同的空间频率和两只眼睛中不同的屏幕运动阻尼进行的强制选择心理物理实验表明,深度上的感知错位与具有更大运动阻尼的眼睛有关。一个目标跟踪实验提供了更直接的证据,表明异常普夫吕克效应是由眼睛之间的时间整合和延迟差异引起的。这些发现突出了感觉处理中的时间差异对视觉系统带来的计算障碍。未来的工作将探索视觉系统如何克服这些挑战以实现准确的感知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/e450efe10d51/jovi-22-12-12-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/2f417007281b/jovi-22-12-12-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/861fe937210d/jovi-22-12-12-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/bc76a571be54/jovi-22-12-12-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/4b2c6ef28a3a/jovi-22-12-12-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/5923f2433e77/jovi-22-12-12-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/e06e14614d30/jovi-22-12-12-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/e450efe10d51/jovi-22-12-12-f007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/2f417007281b/jovi-22-12-12-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/861fe937210d/jovi-22-12-12-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/bc76a571be54/jovi-22-12-12-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/4b2c6ef28a3a/jovi-22-12-12-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/5923f2433e77/jovi-22-12-12-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/e06e14614d30/jovi-22-12-12-f006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11b5/9652723/e450efe10d51/jovi-22-12-12-f007.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptual consequences of interocular differences in the duration of temporal integration.双眼间时间整合持续时间差异的知觉后果。
J Vis. 2022 Nov 1;22(12):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.12.12.
2
Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.单眼视与运动错觉。
Curr Biol. 2019 Aug 5;29(15):2586-2592.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.070. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
3
Spatial and temporal tuning of motion in depth.深度运动的空间和时间调谐
Vision Res. 2003 Dec;43(27):2861-73. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.08.006.
4
Interocular Differences in Spatial Frequency Influence the Pulfrich Effect.空间频率的眼间差异影响普尔弗里希效应。
Vision (Basel). 2020 Mar 20;4(1):20. doi: 10.3390/vision4010020.
5
The magnitude of monocular light attenuation required to elicit the Pulfrich illusion.引起普尔弗里希错觉所需的单眼光衰减幅度。
Vision Res. 2021 Oct;187:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Two Patterns of Interocular Delay Revealed by Spontaneous Motion-in-Depth Pulfrich Phenomenon in Amblyopes with Stereopsis.双眼间延迟的两种模式:立体视锐度正常的弱视者自发深度运动视差浦耳弗利希现象揭示
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Mar 9;61(3):22. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.3.22.
7
The stroboscopic Pulfrich effect is not evidence for the joint encoding of motion and depth.频闪普利弗里奇效应并非运动与深度联合编码的证据。
J Vis. 2005 May 17;5(5):417-34. doi: 10.1167/5.5.3.
8
Visual latency in the spontaneous Pulfrich effect.自发性普利弗里奇效应中的视觉潜伏期。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Aug;240(8):644-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0501-z. Epub 2002 Jun 27.
9
Psychophysical determination of visual processing time by comparing depth seen in Pulfrich and Mach-Dvorak illusions.通过比较普尔弗里希错觉和马赫-德沃夏克错觉中所见深度来进行视觉处理时间的心理物理学测定。
Am J Physiol. 1994 Dec;267(6 Pt 3):S54-64. doi: 10.1152/advances.1994.267.6.S54.
10
A physiological correlate of the Pulfrich effect in cortical neurons of the cat.猫皮层神经元中普尔弗里希效应的生理关联
Vision Res. 1989;29(2):155-65. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(89)90121-1.

引用本文的文献

1
How distinct sources of nuisance variability in natural images and scenes limit human stereopsis.自然图像和场景中不同的干扰性变异性来源如何限制人类立体视觉。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Apr 15;21(4):e1012945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012945. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Decreases in overall light level increase the severity of the reverse Pulfrich effect.整体光照水平的降低会增加反向普尔弗里希效应的严重程度。
J Vis. 2025 Mar 3;25(3):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.3.7.
3
Temporal dynamics of human color processing measured using a continuous tracking task.

本文引用的文献

1
Contact lenses, the reverse Pulfrich effect, and anti-Pulfrich monovision corrections.接触镜、反向普尔弗里希效应和反普尔弗里希单视矫正。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 30;10(1):16086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71395-y.
2
Image-Computable Ideal Observers for Tasks with Natural Stimuli.用于自然刺激任务的图像可计算理想观察者
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2020 Sep 15;6:491-517. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-030320-041134. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Natural scene statistics predict how humans pool information across space in surface tilt estimation.自然场景统计预测了人类在估计表面倾斜度时如何在空间上汇集信息。
使用连续跟踪任务测量的人类颜色处理的时间动态。
J Vis. 2025 Feb 3;25(2):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.2.12.
4
Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future.连续心理物理学:过去、现在与未来。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 May;29(5):481-493. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.005. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
5
Comment on: "Effects of Monocular Flicker on Binocular Imbalance in Amblyopic and Nonamblyopic Adults".关于《单眼闪烁对弱视和非弱视成年人双眼失衡的影响》的评论
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 Feb 3;66(2):29. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.2.29.
6
Continuous temporal integration in the human visual system.人类视觉系统中的连续时间整合。
J Vis. 2024 Dec 2;24(13):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.13.5.
7
Continuous psychophysics shows millisecond-scale visual processing delays are faithfully preserved in movement dynamics.连续心理物理学表明,毫秒级的视觉处理延迟在运动动力学中得以忠实地保留。
J Vis. 2024 May 1;24(5):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.5.4.
8
Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.测量斜视的双眼间延迟及其与弱视视力的关系。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Jan 2;65(1):2. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.1.2.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jun 24;16(6):e1007947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007947. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
Interocular Differences in Spatial Frequency Influence the Pulfrich Effect.空间频率的眼间差异影响普尔弗里希效应。
Vision (Basel). 2020 Mar 20;4(1):20. doi: 10.3390/vision4010020.
5
Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.预测自然刺激下速度知觉行为变异性的划分。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 22;40(4):864-879. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1904-19.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
6
Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.单眼视与运动错觉。
Curr Biol. 2019 Aug 5;29(15):2586-2592.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.070. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
7
Lawful tracking of visual motion in humans, macaques, and marmosets in a naturalistic, continuous, and untrained behavioral context.在自然的、连续的和未经训练的行为背景下,对人类、猕猴和狨猴的视觉运动进行合法追踪。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):E10486-E10494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807192115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
8
The lawful imprecision of human surface tilt estimation in natural scenes.人类在自然场景中对表面倾斜估计的合法不精确性。
Elife. 2018 Jan 31;7:e31448. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31448.
9
Interocular contrast difference drives illusory 3D percept.双眼对比度差异驱动错觉三维感知。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5587. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06151-w.
10
Dynamic mechanisms of visually guided 3D motion tracking.视觉引导的三维运动跟踪的动态机制
J Neurophysiol. 2017 Sep 1;118(3):1515-1531. doi: 10.1152/jn.00831.2016. Epub 2017 Jun 21.