Chan Ho Ming, Saunders Jeffrey A
Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jan;49(1):34-50. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001060. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
Affective state has been shown to affect attention, but the affective dimension responsible for attentional effects remains under debate. Some studies suggest that attentional effects depend on the valence dimension of the affective state. Others have proposed that attentional effects depend on the motivational intensity of the affective state. We tested the effect of induced affective states on the attentional blink and attentional breadth. In separate conditions, we induced four affective states with different combinations of valence (positive vs. negative) and motivational intensity (low vs. high). We used an RSVP digit identification task to measure the attentional blink and used the local-global visual processing task to measure attentional breadth. For both tasks, affective pictures were presented before each trial to induce the intended affective state. In Experiment 1, the affective pictures were chosen to have similar average arousal across conditions, whereas in Experiment 2, arousal was allowed to covary with expected motivational intensity. Contrary to previous findings, we found no evidence that affective state influenced either the attentional blink or attention breadth. We found no detectable differences between conditions with positive or negative induced affect, nor between affective state conditions with low or high motivational intensity. For attentional blink, the size of the possible effects was at most a 2-3% change in detection rate. Our results suggest that either the affective induction method is not reliably effective, or there is not a direct relationship between the valence or motivational intensity of affective state and the distribution of attention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
情感状态已被证明会影响注意力,但负责注意力效应的情感维度仍存在争议。一些研究表明,注意力效应取决于情感状态的效价维度。另一些研究则提出,注意力效应取决于情感状态的动机强度。我们测试了诱发的情感状态对注意瞬脱和注意广度的影响。在不同条件下,我们通过效价(积极与消极)和动机强度(低与高)的不同组合诱发了四种情感状态。我们使用快速序列视觉呈现数字识别任务来测量注意瞬脱,并使用局部-全局视觉加工任务来测量注意广度。对于这两项任务,在每次试验前都会呈现情感图片以诱发预期的情感状态。在实验1中,情感图片被选择为在不同条件下具有相似的平均唤醒水平,而在实验2中,唤醒水平被允许与预期的动机强度共同变化。与之前的研究结果相反,我们没有发现情感状态会影响注意瞬脱或注意广度的证据。我们没有发现诱发积极或消极情感的条件之间,以及低或高动机强度的情感状态条件之间存在可检测到的差异。对于注意瞬脱,可能的效应大小最多是检测率有2 - 3%的变化。我们的结果表明,要么情感诱发方法不可靠有效,要么情感状态的效价或动机强度与注意力分配之间不存在直接关系。(PsycInfo数据库记录 (c) 2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)