Dourado Amândio, Gomes Anabela, Teixeira Paulo, Lobo Luís, Azevedo Jorge T, Dias Isabel R, Pinelas Rui
Veterinary Hospital of Porto, 4250-475 Porto, Portugal.
Department of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences (ECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.
Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 8;9(11):623. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9110623.
A commonly described analgesic protocol for ovariohysterectomy (OHE) combines systemic opioids, sedatives, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, systemic analgesia does not fully prevent perioperative visceral and somatic pain triggered by the surgical stimulus.
To compare the analgesic effects and quality of recovery of systemic analgesia with those of a sacrococcygeal epidural injection of lidocaine and morphine in cats undergoing elective OHE. Methods Twenty domestic female cats were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (0.01 mg kg IM) and alfaxalone (1.5 mg kg IM) and randomly assigned to one of two analgesic protocols: methadone (0.2 mg kg IM) in the control group CTR ( = 10) and methadone (0.1 mg kg IM) + epidural (lidocaine 2% (0.3 mL kg) + morphine 1% (0.1 mg kg) diluted with NaCl 0.9% to a total volume of 1.5 mL in the SCC-E group ( = 10). General anaesthesia was induced with alfaxalone (1 mg kg IV) and maintained with sevoflurane in 100% oxygen. Non-invasive blood arterial pressure and cardiorespiratory variables were recorded. The quality of recovery was assessed using a simple descriptive scale. Before surgery and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 h post-op pain was assessed using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS) and mechanical nociception thresholds (MNT). The repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare groups over time. Comparison between groups was performed using independent samples -test if the assumption of normality was verified, or the Mann-Whitney test. The chi-square test of independence and exact Fisher's test were used to compare groups according to recovery quality.
Heart rate and systolic arterial pressure increased significantly from baseline values in the CTR group and did not change in the SCC-E group. In the CTR group, MNT and UNESP-Botucatu-MCPS scores increased significantly from baseline for all assessment points and the first 3 h, respectively, whereas this did not occur in the SCC-E group.
Based on our results, the SCC-E administration of lidocaine 2% with morphine 1% is a reasonable option to provide perioperative analgesia in cats submitted to OHE, compared to a systemic protocol alone.
一种常用于卵巢子宫切除术(OHE)的镇痛方案是联合使用全身性阿片类药物、镇静剂和非甾体类抗炎药。然而,全身镇痛并不能完全预防手术刺激引发的围手术期内脏和躯体疼痛。
比较在接受择期卵巢子宫切除术的猫中,全身镇痛与骶尾硬膜外注射利多卡因和吗啡的镇痛效果及恢复质量。方法20只家养雌性猫用右美托咪定(0.01 mg/kg,肌肉注射)和阿法沙龙(1.5 mg/kg,肌肉注射)进行预处理,然后随机分配到两种镇痛方案之一:对照组(CTR,n = 10)使用美沙酮(0.2 mg/kg,肌肉注射),骶尾硬膜外组(SCC-E,n = 10)使用美沙酮(0.1 mg/kg,肌肉注射)+硬膜外注射(2%利多卡因(0.3 mL/kg)+1%吗啡(0.1 mg/kg),用0.9%氯化钠稀释至总体积1.5 mL)。用阿法沙龙(1 mg/kg,静脉注射)诱导全身麻醉,并用100%氧气中的七氟醚维持麻醉。记录无创动脉血压和心肺变量。使用简单描述性量表评估恢复质量。在手术前以及术后1、2、3、4、6和8小时,使用圣保罗大学-博图卡图多维复合疼痛量表(MCPS)和机械伤害感受阈值(MNT)评估疼痛。采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)比较不同时间点的组间差异。如果验证了正态性假设,则使用独立样本t检验进行组间比较,否则使用曼-惠特尼检验。使用独立性卡方检验和精确费舍尔检验根据恢复质量比较组间差异。
CTR组心率和收缩压较基线值显著升高,而SCC-E组未发生变化。在CTR组中,所有评估点的MNT和前3小时的圣保罗大学-博图卡图-MCPS评分较基线值均显著升高,而SCC-E组未出现这种情况。
根据我们的研究结果,与单独的全身给药方案相比,在接受卵巢子宫切除术的猫中,给予2%利多卡因与1%吗啡的骶尾硬膜外给药是提供围手术期镇痛的合理选择。