Interventional Cardiology, Montefiore-Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 1;186:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.10.024. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
Up to half of real-world patients with secondary mitral regurgitation who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) do not meet the highly selective COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation) criteria. No randomized trials or standardized and validated tools exist to evaluate the risk: benefit ratio of TEER in this specific population. We sought to derive and externally validate a clinical risk score to predict the risk of death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization for COAPT-ineligible patients who underwent TEER (CITE score). The study population consisted of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation having at least 1 exclusion criterion of the COAPT trial. The derivation cohort included 489 patients from the GIOTTO (GIse registry of Transcatheter treatment of Mitral Valve regurgitaTiOn) registry. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of 2-year death/HF hospitalization and develop a numerical risk score. The predictive performance was assessed in the derivation cohort and validated in 268 patients from the MiZüBr (Milan-Zürich-Brescia) registry. The CITE score (hemodynamic instability, left ventricular impairment, New York Heart Association class III/IV, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, brain natriuretic peptide, and hemoglobin) showed a c-index for 2-year death or HF hospitalization of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 to 0.73) in the derivation cohort, and 0.68 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.73) in the validation cohort. A cutoff of <12 points was selected to identify patients at lower risk of adverse outcomes, hazard ratio of 0.35 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.46). In conclusion, the CITE score is a simple 7-item tool for the prediction of death or HF hospitalization at 2 years after TEER in COAPT-ineligible patients. The score may support clinical decision-making by identifying those patients who, even if excluded from clinical trials, can still benefit from TEER.
在接受经导管缘对缘修复(TEER)的继发性二尖瓣反流患者中,高达一半的患者不符合高度选择性 COAPT(心力衰竭伴功能性二尖瓣反流患者经皮二尖瓣夹合术心血管结局评估)标准。目前尚无随机试验或标准化和经过验证的工具来评估该特定人群中 TEER 的风险效益比。我们试图得出并外部验证一个临床风险评分,以预测不符合 COAPT 标准的接受 TEER 的患者(CITE 评分)的死亡或心力衰竭(HF)住院风险。研究人群包括至少有 1 项 COAPT 试验排除标准的继发性二尖瓣反流患者。该推导队列包括 GIOTTO(经导管治疗二尖瓣反流的 GIse 注册研究)注册中的 489 名患者。Cox 比例风险回归用于确定 2 年死亡/HF 住院的预测因素,并制定数值风险评分。推导队列评估了预测性能,并在 MiZüBr(米兰-苏黎世-布雷西亚)注册中的 268 名患者中进行了验证。CITE 评分(血流动力学不稳定、左心室功能障碍、纽约心脏协会心功能分级 III/IV 级、外周动脉疾病、心房颤动、脑钠肽和血红蛋白)在推导队列中 2 年死亡或 HF 住院的 C 指数为 0.70(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.67 至 0.73),在验证队列中为 0.68(95%CI 0.64 至 0.73)。选择<12 分的切点来识别发生不良结局风险较低的患者,风险比为 0.35(95%CI 0.26 至 0.46)。总之,CITE 评分是一种简单的 7 项工具,用于预测 COAPT 不合格患者 TEER 后 2 年的死亡或 HF 住院。该评分可以通过识别那些即使被排除在临床试验之外仍能从 TEER 中获益的患者,为临床决策提供支持。