School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Research Center of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal, QC, Canada; Research Centre of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Research Centre of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Jan;7(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00278-4. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
Uncertainty remains regarding the causal effect of physical activity and sedentary behaviours on the development of type 2 diabetes in children. We aimed to estimate average treatment effects of physical activity and sedentary behaviours on risk of type 2 diabetes in individuals who are at risk during childhood and adolescence.
We used data from the Quebec Adipose and Lifestyle Investigation in Youth (QUALITY) cohort of children of western European descent (white non-Hispanic race or ethnicity) with a parental history of obesity (defined as a BMI of 30 kg/m or more, or a waist circumference of more than 102 cm in men and 88 cm in women) evaluated at the ages of 8-10 years (baseline), 10-12 years (first follow-up cycle), and 15-17 years (second follow-up cycle) in Québec, Canada. We measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time by accelerometry, and leisure screen time by questionnaire at each cycle. Outcomes included fasting and 2 h post-load glycaemia and validated indices of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. We estimated average treatment effects of MVPA, sedentary time, and screen time on markers of type 2 diabetes using longitudinal marginal structural models with time-varying exposures, outcomes, and confounders from the ages of 8-10 to 15-17 years and inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighting. We considered both the current and cumulative effects of exposures on outcomes.
630 children were evaluated at baseline (age 8-10 years) between July, 2005, and December, 2008, 564 were evaluated at the first follow-up (age 10-12 years) between July, 2007, and March, 2011, and 377 were evaluated at the second follow-up (age 15-17 years) between September, 2012, and May, 2016. Based on cumulative exposure results, estimated average treatment effects for MVPA were 5·6% (95% CI 2·8 to 8·5) on insulin sensitivity and -3·8% (-7·1 to -0·5) on second-phase insulin secretion per 10 min daily increment from the ages of 8-10 years to age 15-17 years. Average treatment effects for sedentary time and reported screen time resulted in reduced insulin sensitivity (-8·2% [-12·3 to -3·9] and -6·4% [-10·1 to -2·5], respectively), increased second-phase insulin secretion (5·9% [1·9 to 10·1] and 7·0% [-0·1 to 14·7], respectively), and higher fasting glycaemia (0·03 mmol/L [0·003 to 0·05] and 0·02 mmol/L [0·01 to 0·03], respectively) per additional daily hour from the ages of 8-10 years to 15-17 years.
Using modern causal inference approaches strengthened the evidence of MVPA and sedentary behaviours as key drivers of development of type 2 diabetes in at-risk children and adolescents, and should be considered as key targets for prevention.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé.
For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
关于体力活动和久坐行为对儿童 2 型糖尿病发展的因果效应,目前仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估在儿童和青少年时期处于危险中的个体中,体力活动和久坐行为对 2 型糖尿病风险的平均治疗效果。
我们使用了来自魁北克西部欧洲血统(白种非西班牙裔种族或民族)儿童的魁北克脂肪和生活方式调查(QUALITY)队列的数据,这些儿童的父母中有肥胖史(定义为 BMI 为 30 kg/m 或更高,或男性腰围超过 102 cm,女性腰围超过 88 cm),在加拿大魁北克省接受评估,年龄在 8-10 岁(基线)、10-12 岁(第一随访周期)和 15-17 岁(第二随访周期)。我们使用加速度计测量了中等到剧烈的体力活动(MVPA)和久坐时间,使用问卷测量了休闲屏幕时间。在 8-10 岁至 15-17 岁期间,使用纵向边际结构模型,结合随时间变化的暴露、结局和混杂因素,以及治疗和随访权重的逆概率,估计了 MVPA、久坐时间和屏幕时间对 2 型糖尿病标志物的平均治疗效果。我们考虑了暴露对结局的当前和累积影响。
630 名儿童在基线(8-10 岁)时接受了评估,时间为 2005 年 7 月至 2008 年 12 月,564 名儿童在第一次随访(10-12 岁)时接受了评估,时间为 2007 年 7 月至 2011 年 3 月,377 名儿童在第二次随访(15-17 岁)时接受了评估,时间为 2012 年 9 月至 2016 年 5 月。基于累积暴露结果,从 8-10 岁到 15-17 岁,MVPA 每增加 10 分钟,估计的平均治疗效果分别为胰岛素敏感性增加 5.6%(95%CI 2.8 至 8.5)和第二阶段胰岛素分泌减少 3.8%(7.1 至 0.5)。久坐时间和报告的屏幕时间的平均治疗效果导致胰岛素敏感性降低(分别为-8.2%[-12.3 至-3.9]和-6.4%[-10.1 至-2.5]),第二阶段胰岛素分泌增加(分别为 5.9%[1.9 至 10.1]和 7.0%[-0.1 至 14.7]),空腹血糖升高(分别为 0.03 mmol/L[0.003 至 0.05]和 0.02 mmol/L[0.01 至 0.03]),从 8-10 岁到 15-17 岁,每天每增加 1 小时。
使用现代因果推理方法,加强了体力活动和久坐行为是高危儿童和青少年 2 型糖尿病发展的关键驱动因素的证据,应被视为预防的关键目标。
加拿大卫生研究院、加拿大心脏和中风基金会以及魁北克健康研究基金会。