Suppr超能文献

评估非侵入性迷走神经刺激治疗急性中风的安全性和可行性。

Assessment of safety and feasibility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of acute stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):1467-1474. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.10.012. Epub 2022 Nov 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) using a hand-held stimulator placed on the neck is an FDA-approved treatment for primary headache disorders. The safety of nVNS is unknown in stroke patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and feasibility of nVNS for the acute treatment of stroke.

METHODS

TR-VENUS (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03733431) was a randomized, sham-controlled, open-label, multicenter trial conducted in patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Patients were randomly assigned to standard-dose nVNS, high-dose nVNS, or sham stimulation. The primary endpoint was a composite safety outcome defined as bradycardia or reduction in mean arterial blood pressure during treatment or progression of neurological or death within 24 h of treatment. The feasibility endpoints were the proportion of eligible subjects receiving nVNS within 6 h of symptom onset and the proportion completing all pre-specified treatment doses. Efficacy assessments included infarct growth from baseline to 24 h after treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (61 IS, 8 ICH) completed the study. The composite safety outcome was achieved in 32.0% in sham and 47.7% in nVNS group (p = 0.203). Treatment was initiated in all but two randomized patients. All dosed subjects received 100% of prespecified stimulations. A non-significant reduction in infarct growth was observed in the high-dose nVNS group (184.2% in sham vs. 63.3% in high-dose nVNS; p = 0.109).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that nVNS may be safe and feasible in the setting of acute stroke. These findings support further development of nVNS as a potential treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

摘要

背景

使用放置在颈部的手持式刺激器进行非侵入性迷走神经刺激(nVNS)是 FDA 批准的原发性头痛疾病治疗方法。nVNS 在中风患者中的安全性尚不清楚。

目的

评估 nVNS 用于急性中风治疗的安全性和可行性。

方法

TR-VENUS(clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT03733431)是一项随机、假对照、开放标签、多中心试验,在急性缺血性中风(IS)或脑出血(ICH)患者中进行。患者被随机分配接受标准剂量 nVNS、高剂量 nVNS 或假刺激。主要终点是治疗期间或治疗后 24 小时内出现心动过缓或平均动脉血压降低、神经功能恶化或死亡的复合安全性结局。可行性终点是符合条件的患者在症状发作后 6 小时内接受 nVNS 的比例和完成所有预定治疗剂量的比例。疗效评估包括从基线到治疗后 24 小时的梗死进展。

结果

69 名患者(61 名 IS,8 名 ICH)完成了研究。假刺激组有 32.0%达到复合安全性结局,nVNS 组有 47.7%(p=0.203)。除了两名随机患者外,所有接受治疗的患者均开始治疗。所有接受剂量的患者均接受了 100%的预设刺激。高剂量 nVNS 组观察到梗死进展的非显著性降低(假刺激组为 184.2%,高剂量 nVNS 组为 63.3%;p=0.109)。

结论

这项研究的结果表明,nVNS 在急性中风环境中可能是安全且可行的。这些发现支持进一步开发 nVNS 作为急性缺血性中风的潜在治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验