Behavioural Practice, Kantar Public UK: 4 Millbank, London, SW1P 3JA, United Kingdom.
Behavioural Practice, Kantar Public UK: 4 Millbank, London, SW1P 3JA, United Kingdom; Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, LA1 4YL, United Kingdom.
Appetite. 2023 Feb 1;181:106368. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106368. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
Food products have significant impacts on the environment over their life cycle. We investigated whether displaying products in ascending order of carbon footprint in an online supermarket environment can shift consumer choices towards more sustainable options. We examined whether the effect of the ordering intervention differs when the ordering is overt (information about the ordering is explicit), compared to when it is covert (participants not told about the ordering). We conducted a three-arm parallel-group randomised trial using 1842 online participants from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Participants shopped for a meal, choosing one product from each of six product categories in a simulated online supermarket. Six products were listed vertically on each product-category page. Products were randomly ordered for the control arm but ordered by carbon footprint in the covert and overt ordering arms. In the overt ordering arm, a statement was displayed at the top of each product page about the ordering of products. The primary outcome was whether one of the three most sustainable products was chosen in each product category. There was no effect of the covert ordering on the probability of choosing more sustainable products compared with the control arm (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.07, p = 0.533). Furthermore, we did not find evidence that the effects of the covert ordering and overt ordering differed (p = 0.594). Within the control condition, products in different positions were chosen with similar frequencies, suggesting that product positioning does not have an impact on choices. This may explain why re-ordering products had no effect. In the overt condition, only 19.5% of people correctly answered that the products were ordered according to sustainability in a follow-up question, suggesting that they didn't notice the statement. Results suggest that choices for grocery products might be too ingrained to be changed by subtle rearrangements of choice architecture like the ordering interventions, and highlight the difficulty of conveying information effectively to consumers in the online grocery shopping environment.
食品在其生命周期内对环境有重大影响。我们研究了在在线超市环境中按碳足迹升序展示产品是否可以促使消费者选择更可持续的选项。我们研究了当排序干预是公开(关于排序的信息是明确的)时,与当它是隐蔽(不告知参与者关于排序)时,排序干预的效果是否不同。我们使用来自英格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的 1842 名在线参与者进行了一项三臂平行组随机试验。参与者在模拟的在线超市中为一顿饭购物,从六个产品类别中的每个类别中选择一个产品。每个产品类别页面上垂直列出六个产品。控制臂中的产品随机排序,但隐蔽和公开排序臂中的产品按碳足迹排序。在公开排序臂中,在每个产品页面的顶部显示一条关于产品排序的声明。主要结果是在每个产品类别中是否选择了三种最可持续的产品之一。与控制臂相比,隐蔽排序对选择更可持续产品的概率没有影响(OR=0.97,95%CI 0.88-1.07,p=0.533)。此外,我们没有发现隐蔽排序和公开排序的效果不同的证据(p=0.594)。在控制条件下,不同位置的产品被选择的频率相似,这表明产品定位对选择没有影响。这可能解释了为什么重新排序产品没有效果。在公开条件下,只有 19.5%的人在后续问题中正确回答产品是根据可持续性排序的,这表明他们没有注意到声明。结果表明,杂货产品的选择可能太根深蒂固,无法通过选择架构的微妙重新排列(如排序干预)来改变,并强调了在在线杂货购物环境中向消费者有效传达信息的困难。