• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产品信息能否引导人们做出可持续和健康的食物选择?一项在线超市的试点研究。

Can Product Information Steer towards Sustainable and Healthy Food Choices? A Pilot Study in an Online Supermarket.

机构信息

Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Open Evidence Research, 08005 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;19(3):1107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031107.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19031107
PMID:35162129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8834331/
Abstract

Sustainable dietary choices have become increasingly important because of the current environmental threats the world is facing. Nonetheless, consumers find it difficult to assess a product's sustainability and therefore make better choices. This pilot study tested whether explanatory product information about sustainability increased sustainable purchases in an online supermarket and whether additional health information increased message effectiveness. Perceived consumer effectiveness (i.e., the perception of the degree to which individual actions can contribute to environmental problems) and green skepticism were hypothesized to mediate the effect of message type, and environmental attitudes were included as the moderator. An experiment using a one-factor design was conducted among 101 participants who were assigned to one of three experimental conditions: sustainability claim only, explanatory sustainability claim, and explanatory sustainability and health claim. Analyses showed that an explanatory sustainability claim (regardless of whether this claim was accompanied by a health claim) led to fewer sustainable purchases through perceived consumer effectiveness but only for those with low environmental attitudes. No effects were found for the addition of a health claim. The results from this pilot provide insight for future studies that aim to examine how online supermarkets should communicate to increase sustainable purchases.

摘要

由于当前世界面临的环境威胁,可持续的饮食选择变得越来越重要。尽管如此,消费者发现很难评估产品的可持续性,因此难以做出更好的选择。这项初步研究测试了在网上超市中,有关可持续性的解释性产品信息是否会增加可持续性购买,以及额外的健康信息是否会提高信息的有效性。假设感知到的消费者效力(即个人行为对环境问题的贡献程度的感知)和绿色怀疑论会对信息类型的效果产生中介作用,并且将环境态度作为调节变量。在 101 名参与者中进行了一项单因素设计的实验,他们被分配到三个实验条件之一:仅可持续性声明、解释性可持续性声明和解释性可持续性和健康声明。分析表明,解释性可持续性声明(无论是否附有健康声明)通过感知到的消费者效力导致可持续性购买减少,但仅对环境态度较低的人有效。添加健康声明没有效果。这项初步研究的结果为未来旨在研究在线超市应如何进行沟通以增加可持续性购买的研究提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/50ed36d553da/ijerph-19-01107-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/0e90f7fe77bb/ijerph-19-01107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/1beefc4b554b/ijerph-19-01107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/43a0e2635ace/ijerph-19-01107-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/50ed36d553da/ijerph-19-01107-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/0e90f7fe77bb/ijerph-19-01107-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/1beefc4b554b/ijerph-19-01107-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/43a0e2635ace/ijerph-19-01107-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a8/8834331/50ed36d553da/ijerph-19-01107-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Can Product Information Steer towards Sustainable and Healthy Food Choices? A Pilot Study in an Online Supermarket.产品信息能否引导人们做出可持续和健康的食物选择?一项在线超市的试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 19;19(3):1107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031107.
2
The impact of an eco-score label on US consumers' perceptions of environmental sustainability and intentions to purchase food: A randomized experiment.生态评分标签对美国消费者对环境可持续性的认知和购买食品意愿的影响:一项随机实验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306123. eCollection 2024.
3
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
4
Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: Two randomised controlled trials in an experimental online supermarket.环境影响标签对食品购买可持续性的影响:实验性在线超市中的两项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0272800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272800. eCollection 2022.
5
Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.消费者对有机食品和本地食品可持续性属性的认知
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2018;9(2):87-96. doi: 10.2174/2212798410666171215112058.
6
Influence of front-of-pack labelling and regulated nutrition claims on consumers' perceptions of product healthfulness and purchase intentions: A randomized controlled trial.预包装标签和规定营养声称对消费者对产品健康感知和购买意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Appetite. 2020 Jun 1;149:104629. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104629. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
7
Consumer and product-specific characteristics influencing the effect of nutrition, health and risk reduction claims on preferences and purchase behavior - A systematic review.消费者和产品特定特征对营养、健康和降低风险声称影响偏好和购买行为的影响 - 系统评价。
Appetite. 2018 Aug 1;127:303-323. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Testing the impact of overt and covert ordering interventions on sustainable consumption choices: A randomised controlled trial.测试显性和隐性订单干预对可持续消费选择的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Appetite. 2023 Feb 1;181:106368. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106368. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
9
Effects of environmental impact labels on the sustainability of food purchases: A randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket.环境影响标签对食品购买可持续性的影响:实验性在线超市中的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0309386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309386. eCollection 2024.
10
Traffic-light front-of-pack environmental labelling across food categories triggers more environmentally friendly food choices: a randomised controlled trial in virtual reality supermarket.跨食品类别的红绿灯式包装环境标签可促进更环保的食物选择:虚拟现实超市中的一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Jan 26;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01410-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Which Consumers Change Their Food Choices in Response to Carbon Footprint Labels? The Role of Political Ideology and Other Socio-Demographic Factors.哪些消费者会根据碳足迹标签改变他们的食物选择?政治意识形态和其他社会人口因素的作用。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 10;17(8):1321. doi: 10.3390/nu17081321.
2
Strengths and weaknesses of food eco-labeling: a review.食品生态标签的优势与不足:综述
Front Nutr. 2024 Mar 27;11:1381135. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1381135. eCollection 2024.
3
Effect of perception of sustainability in local food experiences on healthy eating tendency: mediator and moderator effects.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Packaging Color and Health Claims on Product Attitude and Buying Intention.包装颜色和健康声明对产品态度和购买意愿的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 18;17(6):1991. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061991.
2
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
3
Inertia and Decision Making.惯性与决策制定
当地食物体验中的可持续性认知对健康饮食倾向的影响:中介效应和调节效应
Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 7;10:1150277. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1150277. eCollection 2023.
4
Sustainability Transitions in E-commerce Research-Academic Achievements and Impediments.电子商务研究中的可持续发展转型——学术成果与障碍
Circ Econ Sustain. 2023 Jan 11:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s43615-023-00252-7.
5
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Rice from Remediated Soil: Potential from the Public in Sustainable Soil Pollution Treatment.消费者对修复土壤中产出的大米的支付意愿:来自公众对可持续土壤污染治理的潜力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;19(15):8946. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19158946.
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 16;7:169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00169. eCollection 2016.
4
Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour.选择有机食品与对人类健康的感知后果以及环保行为有关。
Appetite. 2003 Apr;40(2):109-17. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00002-3.